Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Just putting it out there as an option.

Currently out of contract, Eagles offering a 1 year extension but nothing close to being formalized yet.

Would we consider tempting him over with a 2 year deal, potentially with a coaching offer post-retirement? There's other options ahead of him of course, but would be a relatively cheap option that would cover us while Weid and Jacko develop further.

Bit like the Lewis trade in a way.

 

He’s still more than capable, however the service will be nothing like he gets from the WC mids.

Would much prefer him to Brown/Daniher as he would offer a lot more leadership and direction on field.

 

 

He’s a club champ and still playing well.
No way he’ll be let go

I think the Eagles 1 year deal is about right.

If anyone wants to offer more good luck to them.

It wouldn't be a smart move.


If I thought we had the slightest chance of winning a flag next year, then sure.

But his age profile doesn't fit our list. 

No thanks. He'd take games from Weideman who is ready and willing to nail that full forward spot.

With limited list spots we need to find the guy who compliments Weid, Jackson, Pickett, Fritsch. Those 4 have enough talent to form the basis of a very good forward line, they are just lacking an experienced leader to guide them along.

One option is giving Melksham a significant kick in the backside. Otherwise it's really hard to find experienced forwards. Talls probably aren't the right spot to look, it might have to be a small or even a midfielder ready for a different chapter of their career.

 

There is no way, he'd leave and to offer him 2 years wouldn't be a wise investment in terms of you'd have to play him even if his form dropped and at his age and without the silver service delivery he wouldn't likely have much of an impact for us.

2 hours ago, BW511 said:

He’s still more than capable, however the service will be nothing like he gets from the WC mids.

Would much prefer him to Brown/Daniher as he would offer a lot more leadership and direction on field.

 

I'm not 100% sold on this notion that we can't kick the footy as well as other teams.

Yes, there are a few teams that kick the ball better than us but the good teams rely on breaking down defences by creating easy scoring opportunities on the back of pressure.

Also, it's a bit of a catch 22. Having Kennedy and Darling, for example, allows (or forces) you to do everything you can to create space. Creating space when you don't have that presence makes you vulnerable to the intercept mark.

I suppose what I'm getting at is that you could have a team full of great kicks but if the right structure and effort isn't there, you wouldn't know it.


9 minutes ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

I'm not 100% sold on this notion that we can't kick the footy as well as other teams.

Yes, there are a few teams that kick the ball better than us but the good teams rely on breaking down defences by creating easy scoring opportunities on the back of pressure.

Also, it's a bit of a catch 22. Having Kennedy and Darling, for example, allows (or forces) you to do everything you can to create space. Creating space when you don't have that presence makes you vulnerable to the intercept mark.

I suppose what I'm getting at is that you could have a team full of great kicks but if the right structure and effort isn't there, you wouldn't know it.

Understand all that, but when things are exactly on our terms, we can kick. Anything shy of that and we tend to be dumping it in long.

Having said that, Kennedy can take big pack marks still, so it takes a lot of defending to contain him and Weid.

 

2 hours ago, Superunknown said:

Hell yes.

Will not leave and if he does will retire up in Horrocks on the beach. He is also committed to playing a season with Northampton Rams when done.

Would love to get him but will not happen. 

Ben Brown is an interesting one. Maybe a 3 way trade Preuss to Giants , ? to NM and we get BB.

2 minutes ago, BW511 said:

Understand all that, but when things are exactly on our terms, we can kick. Anything shy of that and we tend to be dumping it in long.

Having said that, Kennedy can take big pack marks still, so it takes a lot of defending to contain him and Weid.

 

Question is, Is that the kickers fault or the fact that there's nothing to kick to?

The worst thing you could possibly do in today's game is lower your eyes and make a shallow entry to a contested target. More often than not that comes back to bite you.

I genuinely don't know where the accountability lies in this situation but if I had to guess, I'd say it has more to do with what's ahead of the ball than the ball carrier.


3 hours ago, Cheesy D. Pun said:

Question is, Is that the kickers fault or the fact that there's nothing to kick to?

The worst thing you could possibly do in today's game is lower your eyes and make a shallow entry to a contested target. More often than not that comes back to bite you.

I genuinely don't know where the accountability lies in this situation but if I had to guess, I'd say it has more to do with what's ahead of the ball than the ball carrier.

I think our kicking problems aren't horrendous but they broadly break down in to 3 categories:

1. Switching/slow build up game: We're light on for defenders and outside mids who we truly trust to play the switch and slow game. Langdon's always running to provide an option. And May, Salem and Rivers are very good. But there's a drop off and to play that way you need all 7 defenders and 2 wings and even the inside mids pushing out to work for each other and trust each other. 

2. Reliably hitting the long target: Gawn rarely loses a long down the line kick yet we still can't routinely park the ball to his advantage at the perfect spot. Yet alone when we have Weid or another forward coming under it. It should be so simple but too many of our players get this basic kick wrong. A second key forward who can move (so not Preuss or Tom) and can compete and bring the ball to ground (so not Brown or McDonald) obviously makes this an easier task

3. Hitting the leading forward: Petracca can lace it to anyone within 60m. Melksham doesn't get it as often but still can. Fritsch is capable of excellent hit up kicks. Pickett has great promise and both Spargo and ANB were vastly improved at the end of the year. So there's hope with the half forwards. Viney got much better. Gus was still hit and miss. Oliver started to trust himself more but the results are still very patchy. Langdon only trusts himself to hit a pop up 30m pass that's a forward killer because it just sits in the air.

If Oliver can make strides, we can find a second wingman and if we find some trusty defensive depth we'll probably be at least average. Even the best sides like Richmond and Port are moving the ball smartly then hitting the spots for Lynch and Dixon to contest far more than they are picking out targets with great kicks.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 17 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 14 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Vomit
      • Thanks
    • 156 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Like
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where they’ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 489 replies
    Demonland