Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, jules7 said:

The Seaford community is not happy at all, we are not allowed to use their facility.  No body is using their ground or rooms, the  council keep it in great condition, all to not avail.  Not even the local clubs are permitted to train or play on their fantastic facilities.

😮

Who uses it then? 

 
9 minutes ago, jules7 said:

The Seaford community is not happy at all, we are not allowed to use their facility.  No body is using their ground or rooms, the  council keep it in great condition, all to not avail.  Not even the local clubs are permitted to train or play on their fantastic facilities.

Who owns/controls it ? 

Cheers

 
On 7/9/2023 at 9:16 AM, old dee said:

Be careful SD I hope you have plenty of years left as this will not be resolved in my life time. 

I have got another 50 years in me at least.

But that may even not be enough time to get a Home Base! 😅😆😂🤣

 

I think I gotta win about $150 million in the lottery to get it done. 🤞

 

In all honesty the Melbourne Football Club should have set up a new Home Base fund after we won the AFL Premiership in 2021. We would of all been quite generous and in good spirits plus it would of been a great initiative to at least get the ball rolling with finances required.

Anyway, it was good to see that the aquatics centre is getting built down at Casey Fields in that video shown previously. That is actually some progress at least! Albeit not exactly what we want when it comes to an actual Home Base. A positive for Casey though!

49 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Who owns/controls it ? 

Cheers

The Frankston Council.  Apparently the St Kilda footy club pay $1.00 a year.

My hubby is a life member of the FDBA basketball down here, and according to manager who runs the basketball stadium, they now have a couple of physio's etc working out of the club rooms, but no other footy club is allowed access to the ground or the club rooms. 

 

Edited by jules7


19 minutes ago, jules7 said:

The Frankston Council.  Apparently the St Kilda footy club pay $1.00 a year.

My hubby is a life member of the FDBA basketball down here, and according to manager who runs the basketball stadium, they now have a couple of physio's etc working out of the club rooms, but no other footy club is allowed access to the ground or the club rooms. 

 

So its Frankston stopping its use not StKikda ??

37 minutes ago, Supreme_Demon said:

I have got another 50 years in me at least.

But that may even not be enough time to get a Home Base! 😅😆😂🤣

 

I think I gotta win about $150 million in the lottery to get it done. 🤞

 

In all honesty the Melbourne Football Club should have set up a new Home Base fund after we won the AFL Premiership in 2021. We would of all been quite generous and in good spirits plus it would of been a great initiative to at least get the ball rolling with finances required.

Anyway, it was good to see that the aquatics centre is getting built down at Casey Fields in that video shown previously. That is actually some progress at least! Albeit not exactly what we want when it comes to an actual Home Base. A positive for Casey though!

Isn't the Club's Future Fund there to do that.

I thought the Club were some way to making Caulfield happen in terms of negotiating with local council and other administrative bodies. 

To my mind I think the Club would be loathe to start announcing any projections given how long it has taken to even find a viable location.

Just on Kossie, put him back into the centre to get his mojo back again. 

17 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

So its Frankston stopping its use not StKikda ??

The Frankston Council in their wisdom gave the St Kilda football club a ten year lease on the ground and the club rooms, for $1.00 a year.  It is the St Kilda football club not wanting to let anyone else use it.

 
2 minutes ago, jules7 said:

The Frankston Council in their wisdom gave the St Kilda football club a ten year lease on the ground and the club rooms, for $1.00 a year.  It is the St Kilda football club not wanting to let anyone else use it.

Probably time to rescind that peppercorn lease.  Im sure anadept legal type could find a loophole.  Silly of the Saints to [censored] off so many Baysiders...Though thats a very StKilda type thing to do...lol.

4 hours ago, beelzebub said:

You can have both...  You could say develop Caulfield as your primary base and still utilise Casey. After all Casey would still use/need Casey..  

Personally, I'd like all of the MFC arms in the one spot, including the administrators. 

Easy to split from Casey, let that team be stand alone VFL and VFLW.

Teaming up with a Caulfield footy club, if we go for and get the race track. 

My point was a little bit about being obliged to use Casey fields if contract, lease and licences forced that, especially if more upgrade stages are on the cards.

Edited by kev martin


4 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Not to be cheeky @kev martin the Saints redeveloped Moorabin after the AFL and Government poured millions into a white elephant down at Seaford.

Whatever happened to that development? 

Currently being used by St Kilda as the southern hub for its Next Generation Academy and home for Frankston and District Junior Football League inter league games. Has recently undergone a renovation for office space for a private practice physiotherapy clinic and the indoor training area and gym. My club is in that association and I do a bit of coaching there with the girls teams. St Kilda are quite lucky to have it still after they signed a long term lease there only to be seduced back to Moorabbin.

3 hours ago, No. 31 said:

The MCG precinct is not going to happen, way too many stakeholders and interested parties there. 

Caulfield option is a gift from the Gods. MFC should be throwing all their chips in for it otherwise its a life of couchsurfing for a long, long time.

I really hope we go for the Caulfield option it's perfect. Please don't let this opportunity slip like Olympic Park presinct

17 hours ago, jules7 said:

The Frankston Council.  Apparently the St Kilda footy club pay $1.00 a year.

My hubby is a life member of the FDBA basketball down here, and according to manager who runs the basketball stadium, they now have a couple of physio's etc working out of the club rooms, but no other footy club is allowed access to the ground or the club rooms. 

 

I think I heard that only the VFLW were using it last year for some games but that was just hearsay. 

16 hours ago, Longsufferingnomore said:

Isn't the Club's Future Fund there to do that.

I thought the Club were some way to making Caulfield happen in terms of negotiating with local council and other administrative bodies. 

To my mind I think the Club would be loathe to start announcing any projections given how long it has taken to even find a viable location.

 

No the current Board have said those monies will not be used for that (I don't know why) 

Why would the Board be loathe to tell the members what is happening?. 

After all they been promising this since they were put in place, and the Board before them, and the one before them.....I have lost track of the number of times at AGM's, player sponsor events and member meetings where this has been sprouted. ....but we can't tell you anything because it is "in confidence"....or "we will have something positive by the end of this year"......then next year " we should have something to announce by season end".....

It was meant to be in construction according to the Strategic plan by the end of this year.

29 minutes ago, george_on_the_outer said:

No the current Board have said those monies will not be used for that (I don't know why) 

Why would the Board be loathe to tell the members what is happening?. 

After all they been promising this since they were put in place, and the Board before them, and the one before them.....I have lost track of the number of times at AGM's, player sponsor events and member meetings where this has been sprouted. ....but we can't tell you anything because it is "in confidence"....or "we will have something positive by the end of this year"......then next year " we should have something to announce by season end".....

It was meant to be in construction according to the Strategic plan by the end of this year.

I always get the impression the MFC board room has some bewitching quality. All who enter it become becalmed and content.

Must be a cozy little gig for those so entrenched.

Nothing really ever happens. After the sandwiches eaten and reds quaffed its down to the serious work ...of napping.

Roffey was ALL about the new home...... ZZzzzzzz... 

Whenever a daring interloper raises their hand to mount a challenge amazingly the scurrilous memos and emails drop into our inboxes. The recalcitrant incursion is blanketed with the dare devil banished to Coventry.

Its obviously more important to suggest something might get done....than do anything.  That might disturb the nappers....so ..Shhhhh !!

 


18 hours ago, Supreme_Demon said:

I have got another 50 years in me at least.

But that may even not be enough time to get a Home Base! 😅😆😂🤣

 

I think I gotta win about $150 million in the lottery to get it done. 🤞

 

In all honesty the Melbourne Football Club should have set up a new Home Base fund after we won the AFL Premiership in 2021. We would of all been quite generous and in good spirits plus it would of been a great initiative to at least get the ball rolling with finances required.

Anyway, it was good to see that the aquatics centre is getting built down at Casey Fields in that video shown previously. That is actually some progress at least! Albeit not exactly what we want when it comes to an actual Home Base. A positive for Casey though!

The case for Casey gets better each day SD.

 Beggars belief after all this time we haven’t found a site for a home base. MGC precinct is a pipe dream. Letting the Caulfield opportunity pass us by would be a travesty and a sackable offence for this board if it happens. 

6 hours ago, beelzebub said:

I always get the impression the MFC board room has some bewitching quality. All who enter it become becalmed and content.

Must be a cozy little gig for those so entrenched.

Nothing really ever happens. After the sandwiches eaten and reds quaffed its down to the serious work ...of napping.

Roffey was ALL about the new home...... ZZzzzzzz... 

Whenever a daring interloper raises their hand to mount a challenge amazingly the scurrilous memos and emails drop into our inboxes. The recalcitrant incursion is blanketed with the dare devil banished to Coventry.

Its obviously more important to suggest something might get done....than do anything.  That might disturb the nappers....so ..Shhhhh !!

 

We have a brand new MFC Nominations Committee now, with a new Chair. Maybe things will change this year?

Pretty disgusting we haven't heard a thing about the development yet.

31 minutes ago, praha said:

Pretty disgusting we haven't heard a thing about the development yet.

Again ...i suggest someone got in on a false premise.  Not just an empty PROMISE...  but a fabricated premise.

A good job our 'business' is sound these days.... the boardroom seems...well...bored.


14 hours ago, george_on_the_outer said:

It was meant to be in construction according to the Strategic plan by the end of this year.

day construction GIF

13 hours ago, old dee said:

The case for Casey gets better each day SD.

A bit too far OD surely?

I live on the east side and it's 45 minutes minimum from here.

Imagine anyone like admin, FD staff, players etc living Nth, West or Bayside (many AFL players live in these leafy salubrious burbs).

Must be taking them 1 hour plus to get over there.

Wouldn't be all that appealing to prospective players we might be trying to lure across either imho.

If only there was something somewhere in the geo centre of Melb.......

 

All just politics at the end of the day. Wording was probably carefully selected, that's the way of life.

Still live in faint, stupid hope. 

I think the most important factor is to continue the pressure on the Melbourne Football Club Board.

Email (or possibly call?) Board Members. Same with the Melbourne Football Club CEO Gary Pert (who I actually think is doing an excellent job overall and I appreciate he is an extremely busy man).

Nevertheless, we need to keep asking the same questions. What is happening with our Home Base? Where will it be built? When will it be built? How long will it take for it to be built? How much will it cost? All fair and reasonable questions.

Basically, we simply keep pestering them on a regular basis (not too much of course!). But enough to make sure they are all held accountable.

We want all the objectives in our Strategic Plan achieved and that, in particular, includes our Home Base.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Like
    • 720 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies