Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Author
On 11/20/2020 at 12:33 PM, Whispering_Jack said:

So am I correct in saying that Bedford, Jordan, Chandler (® A), Lockhart (® A) and Bradtke (® B) are uncontracted at present.

What is the list lodgement cut off day for them to be contracted? Today or next Friday?

Yes, they are the OOC players altho I haven't seen an mfc confirmation of M. Browns re-contracting as a rookie.

I don't know the cut off date for them to be contracted.  I would guess next Friday Nov 27 leaving a few days to nominate for the Draft which close on Nov 30.  Could be wrong.

 
1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Yes, they are the OOC players altho I haven't seen an mfc confirmation of M. Browns re-contracting as a rookie.

I don't know the cut off date for them to be contracted.  I would guess next Friday Nov 27 leaving a few days to nominate for the Draft which close on Nov 30.  Could be wrong.

1st list lodgement on Wednesday

 

On 11/20/2020 at 12:33 PM, Whispering_Jack said:

So am I correct in saying that Bedford, Jordan, Chandler (® A), Lockhart (® A) and Bradtke (® B) are uncontracted at present.

What is the list lodgement cut off day for them to be contracted? Today or next Friday?
 

also worth noting Bradtke wasn't listed in an official afl.com.au website about every clubs OOC around grand final week, its been linked in here before so might not expect any formal announcement about it

 
52 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Does that mean we will have a list 0f 43 because we only have 1 b grade rookie?


  • Author
21 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

So am I correct in saying that Bedford, Jordan, Chandler (rA), Lockhart (rA) and Bradtke (rB) are uncontracted at present.

What is the list lodgement cut off day for them to be contracted? Today or next Friday?

The AFL has issued a new schedule of dates which I've posted in that thread.  The answer to your 2nd question:

Monday 30 November
•    List Lodgement 2
•    Out of Contract Listed AFL Primary List Players Draft Nomination Form and Player Request for Removal from List Form Lodged with AFL
•    Final date for Primary List delistings

2 minutes ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This article on who gets an AFL lifeline states that “Melbourne has re-signed a number of players it is yet to make public including Mitch Brown, Jay Lockhart, Kade Chandler and James Jordon,” and suggests that Toby Bedford is our only player currently in limbo. 

 

so other than Bedford Is Bradke uncontracted?

 
2 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

This article on who gets an AFL lifeline states that “Melbourne has re-signed a number of players it is yet to make public including Mitch Brown, Jay Lockhart, Kade Chandler and James Jordon,” and suggests that Toby Bedford is our only player currently in limbo. 

 

There aren't two players in the entire football playing population of Australia who are better prospects than Chandler & Jordon?

I find that absolutely extraordinary, particularly given that neither plays a role that can't be easily replaced.


  • Author
37 minutes ago, poita said:

There aren't two players in the entire football playing population of Australia who are better prospects than Chandler & Jordon?

I find that absolutely extraordinary, particularly given that neither plays a role that can't be easily replaced.

It could be the reduced sal cap and the way the AFL is implementing it. 

Even renewing those players we have vacant spots on our playing list to add a DFA and a rookie or two (in addition to the 3 draftees we are reportedly to take).

Perhaps the club thinks that unless we can afford a player that will be best 30 then we are no worse off keeping the players we have whose strengths and weaknesses are known.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

Where we stand: 

35 players on the senior list (max 38) 
3 on the Rookie A list (maximum 6) 
1 on the Rookie B list (max 2) 

We can have up to 44 players, we have 39, so 5 spots open - 3 senior list (3 draft picks?), and then 2 rookies. But we can just take one player in the draft and then we have hit our minimum number. 

 

The minimum list size for each club will be 37, which can be made up by as little as 36 senior listed players and one rookie.  To reach 44, clubs can carry 36-38 senior listed players, four-to-six Category A rookies and two Category B rookies.

5 minutes ago, Dee-licious said:

Where we stand: 

35 players on the senior list (max 38) 
3 on the Rookie A list (maximum 6) 
1 on the Rookie B list (max 2) 

We can have up to 44 players, we have 39, so 5 spots open - 3 senior list (3 draft picks?), and then 2 rookies. But we can just take one player in the draft and then we have hit our minimum number. 

 

The minimum list size for each club will be 37, which can be made up by as little as 36 senior listed players and one rookie.  To reach 44, clubs can carry 36-38 senior listed players, four-to-six Category A rookies and two Category B rookies.

With 18, 19, 28, 50 but only 3 spaces, we may well look to upgrade our picks or swap into next year in the lead up to the draft. That being said, not using pick 50 isn't a big deal.

 

13 minutes ago, Dee-licious said:

Where we stand: 

35 players on the senior list (max 38) 
3 on the Rookie A list (maximum 6) 
1 on the Rookie B list (max 2) 

We can have up to 44 players, we have 39, so 5 spots open - 3 senior list (3 draft picks?), and then 2 rookies. But we can just take one player in the draft and then we have hit our minimum number. 

 

The minimum list size for each club will be 37, which can be made up by as little as 36 senior listed players and one rookie.  To reach 44, clubs can carry 36-38 senior listed players, four-to-six Category A rookies and two Category B rookies.

only 1 live rookie pick assuming we re-list nietschke until KK is made inactive that is and then we will have a SSP spot available 


  • Author

Updates:

  • No more players OOC.
  • Re-contracting of Jackson, Bedford, Jordon, Chandler, Brown
  • Well deserved promotion of Lockhart to the senior list
  • Final List sizes confirmed
  • 'Used' draft pick 89 for Lockhart promotion

image.png.72a1bd94489cedcf84389934c47aa53e.png

Heading into the draft we have 35 senior players and 4 rookies (total 39) giving 3 senior and 2 rookie list spots.  3 Draftees will take us to the max allowed 38 senior players.  The 2 rookie spots can be used for a PSSP or (multiple) mid-season drafts.  And extra senior list spot can be created if we put KK onto a L-T injury list.

At this stage it looks like we won't be adding a DFA to the senior list.  A DFA will need to come as a rookie via the PSSP.

I feel confident there will be a draft pick change that involves pick 50 otherwise it is wasted as we don't have a list spot for it.  Reckon it will be #28 + 50 for a pick in the low 20's giving us the 3 picks at the draft.

I will update the games played when I do the final list post drafts.  

Edited by Lucifer's Hero

I think the club will be watching the State league comps closely and get a player in Mid season draft when we remove KK off the list.  Not a bad idea I'm sure there will be a number of players that will not be drafted due to the fact that no one saw them in 2020.

Edited by drdrake

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Updates:

  • No more players OOC.
  • Re-contracting of Jackson, Bedford, Jordon, Chandler, Brown
  • Well deserved promotion of Lockhart to the senior list
  • Final List sizes confirmed
  • 'Used' draft pick 89 for Lockhart promotion

image.png.72a1bd94489cedcf84389934c47aa53e.png

Heading into the draft we have 35 senior players and 4 rookies (total 39) giving 3 senior and 2 rookie list spots.  3 Draftees will take us to the max allowed 38 senior players.  The 2 rookie spots can be used for a PSSP or (multiple) mid-season drafts.  And extra senior list spot can be created if we put KK onto a L-T injury list.

At this stage it looks like we won't be adding a DFA to the senior list.  A DFA will need to come as a rookie via the PSSP.

I feel confident there will be a draft pick change that involves pick 50 otherwise it is wasted as we don't have a list spot for it.  Reckon it will be #28 + 50 for a pick in the low 20's giving us the 3 picks at the draft.

I will update the games played when I do the final list post drafts.  

psst, u left the ('A') status on lockhart ;)

  • Author
2 minutes ago, Turner said:

psst, u left the ('A') status on lockhart ;)

Too bad...I'll change it next time :-)

Thanks Lucifer's Hero for the update, Very happy with the management of the list by the Dee's, put's the trust and ownership back onto our existing list and still have the ability to pick up 5 additional players to potentially strengthen the group. We have learnt from our previous experiences that the grass is not always greener....etc, etc

Well done MFC.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


On 11/23/2020 at 2:32 PM, Lucifer's Hero said:

Updates:

  • No more players OOC.
  • Re-contracting of Jackson, Bedford, Jordon, Chandler, Brown
  • Well deserved promotion of Lockhart to the senior list
  • Final List sizes confirmed
  • 'Used' draft pick 89 for Lockhart promotion

image.png.72a1bd94489cedcf84389934c47aa53e.png

Heading into the draft we have 35 senior players and 4 rookies (total 39) giving 3 senior and 2 rookie list spots.  3 Draftees will take us to the max allowed 38 senior players.  The 2 rookie spots can be used for a PSSP or (multiple) mid-season drafts.  And extra senior list spot can be created if we put KK onto a L-T injury list.

At this stage it looks like we won't be adding a DFA to the senior list.  A DFA will need to come as a rookie via the PSSP.

I feel confident there will be a draft pick change that involves pick 50 otherwise it is wasted as we don't have a list spot for it.  Reckon it will be #28 + 50 for a pick in the low 20's giving us the 3 picks at the draft.

I will update the games played when I do the final list post drafts.  

Love your hard work LH

So KK is off and we have another vacancy on the main list right? ie 38  34 plus 3A and1B

  • Author
5 minutes ago, Kent said:

Love your hard work LH

So KK is off and we have another vacancy on the main list right? ie 38  34 plus 3A and1B

Thank you.

Yes.  38 on the list. 34 + 3'A' + 1'B' as you describe.

Gives us 4 senior list vacancies and 2 Rookie vacancies.

Chart updated for KK's retirement:

image.png.9d5f1d991e5e95ddd399258897dc34fc.png

4 senior vacancies and 4 draft picks.  We may use pick #50, afterall.

4 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Thank you.

Yes.  38 on the list. 34 + 3'A' + 1'B' as you describe.

Gives us 4 senior list vacancies and 2 Rookie vacancies.

Chart updated for KK's retirement:

image.png.9d5f1d991e5e95ddd399258897dc34fc.png

4 senior vacancies and 4 draft picks.  We may use pick #50, afterall.

4 senior vacancies and 2 rookie spots.  
bWe might draft 3 plus a DFA ... or ... as you say use 4 draft picks. 

 
5 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Thank you.

Yes.  38 on the list. 34 + 3'A' + 1'B' as you describe.

Gives us 4 senior list vacancies and 2 Rookie vacancies.

Chart updated for KK's retirement:

image.png.9d5f1d991e5e95ddd399258897dc34fc.png

4 senior vacancies and 4 draft picks.  We may use pick #50, afterall.

That or we use to sign a delisted free agent.

update for the news jordon is to be a rookie?

Edited by Turner


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: North Melbourne

    I suppose that I should apologise for the title of this piece, but the temptation to go with it was far too great. The memory of how North Melbourne tore Melbourne apart at the seams earlier in the season and the way in which it set the scene for the club’s demise so early in the piece has been weighing heavily upon all of us. This game was a must-win from the club’s perspective, and the team’s response was overwhelming. The 36 point win over Alastair Clarkson’s Kangaroos at the MCG on Sunday was indeed — roovenge of the highest order!

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Werribee

    The Casey Demons remain in contention for a VFL finals berth following a comprehensive 76-point victory over the Werribee Tigers at Whitten Oval last night. The caveat to the performance is that the once mighty Tigers have been raided of many key players and are now a shadow of the premiership-winning team from last season. The team suffered a blow before the game when veteran Tom McDonald was withdrawn for senior duty to cover for Steven May who is ill.  However, after conceding the first goal of the game, Casey was dominant from ten minutes in until the very end and despite some early errors and inaccuracy, they managed to warm to the task of dismantling the Tigers with precision, particularly after half time when the nominally home side provided them with minimal resistance.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Carlton

    The Demons return to the MCG as the the visiting team on Saturday night to take on the Blues who are under siege after 4 straight losses. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 68 replies
  • PODCAST: North Melbourne

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees glorious win over the Kangaroos at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 15 replies
  • POSTGAME: North Melbourne

    The Demons are finally back at the MCG and finally back on the winners list as they continually chipped away at a spirited Kangaroos side eventually breaking their backs and opening the floodgates to run out winners by 6 goals.

      • Haha
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 220 replies
  • VOTES: North Melbourne

    Max Gawn has an almost unassailable lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award followed by Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies