Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

Luke Jackson in frame for pick 3. See him as a forward option. Don't see him as a full-time ruckman at AFL level. If we drafted him, would be playing with the forward group.

Interesting!


Interesting that Taylor brought up Kemp himself for players at pick 8, sounded impressed by him.

13 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Luke Jackson in frame for pick 3. See him as a forward option. Don't see him as a full-time ruckman at AFL level. If we drafted him, would be playing with the forward group.

Interesting!

I think he was meaning he would be a forward early in his career.

When asked, he also said that Green was in the mix, and pointed out that we have bid on other academy players before, with the intention of actually taking them. He also mentioned Henry in passing. He hinted that there could be many potential trades of our picks.

 

Pick 3: down to about 3 players
Confirmed Luke Jackson is one of those, liked his improvement post national champs - has gone to see him play in person and play forward, and that he's always played in top junior games.
Hayden Young in the mix, likes his improvement from last year to this year

Wasn't asked much about Green but will bid on academy players as he sees fit
Tim Lamb (list manager) in ongoing talks about pick swaps
Will entertain swaps but aim is to be careful about trading down with the hope of player getting through, doesn't like the risk - if 0.5% risk you're not doing it (something along those lines)

Dealing for pick 8 based around a group of players that might be available as well as 30% of the top 30 next year being academy based
Hosts bring up Lachie Ash, Caleb Serong. JT doesn't really confirm too much about those 2, instead brings up Brodie Kemp and Deven Robertson
Gets asked about Weightman and talks positively about small forwards in the pool 

Aims to take 3-4 draft picks, has a list down to about 75
Likes the top 35 of the draft and then the next group is more pros and cons
Pro Bennell
Still confident in the list, assessing it based on 2018 not just 2019
Talks up the resilience and work ethic of the 2018 draft class - Sparrow, Jordon, Nietschke, Bedford, Dunkley etc
Keen for Spargo to bounce back and bought up Harry Petty - unsure in which role - as a talent for the future

Edited by DeeSpencer

Summary of the interview (paraphrasing):

  • Pick swap with North – looked at next year’s draft which is compromised: 30% of top 30 tied to someone else.  Look at the DVI but deal needs to advantage both clubs.
  • We had a bit of interest in pick 3 during the trade period as it effectively becomes the first live pick.
  • Pick 97 is expected to come in significantly.
  • Lots of chats with other list managers re how draft/pick swap scenarios might play out.
  • Had two days with list management and day one they went thru top 20 to 30 players.  On second day they looked at the next  25.
  • We are looking to use 3 to 4 picks in the draft  (LH note: we only have 3 right now so maybe a split is on the cards).
  • Re picks3:
    • Have 3 players in line for pick 3.  Luke Jackson is in that mix.  We’ve done a lot of work on him.  Don’t see him only as a ruckman and could start his career as a forward.
    • Hayden Young in the mix.  Had a bit to improve and has done that.  Excellent decision maker and execution.
    • At pick 3, you choose best available.  Don’t outsmart yourself!
    • Pick 3 won’t necessarily influence what happens at 8.
    • Tom Green in the mix for pick 3 (LH note: sounds like we rate him highly and would bid for him)
  • Pick 8 -lots of good players around that pick:  Taylor mentioned Kemp, Robertson.  Interviewer mentioned Ash, Serong.  (LH note: my impression was Weightman not in the mix at that stage).
  • Harley Bennell:  Shown resilience.  Long process to go.  (LH note:  Taylor didn’t sound excited but then he is quite laid back)
  • On 2018:  Some things didn’t go our way.  Some mistakes were made.  Players are smarting from last year.  Proof will be in the pudding.
  • SSP and mid-year draft dilutes the mature age draft pool.
  • Petty is going to be a very good long term AFL player.
  • Taylor excited about what Spargo and Fritsch can do.
  • Players are in the club a fair bit and on their toes, as they should be.Feels eligibility for NGA and other academies could be scrutinised more.  

 

E&OE

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


When asked about Weightman, and other good small forwards, he pointed out how rare they are. He also said that when we traded for 8, we didn't have a specific player in mind.

  • Author

Interesting how he mentioned Robertson and Kemp around that pick 8 mark.

I honestly think without the bid of Green at the 3 its out of Jackson and Young.

1 hour ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

 

  • We are looking to use 3 to 4 picks in the draft  (LH note: we only have 3 right now so maybe a split is 

 

Thanks very much for the great summary LH.

I don't think it's correct that we only have 3 picks.  I think we have as many as we need to fill list vacancies up to 40 if we want to but they're at the end of the draft ie currently after 97.

1 minute ago, Fifty-5 said:

Thanks very much for the great summary LH.

I don't think it's correct that we only have 3 picks.  I think we have as many as we need to fill list vacancies up to 40 if we want to but they're at the end of the draft ie currently after 97.

Quite right F5 - an oversight on my part.  Not many picks are used after #100.  Perhaps if #97 comes in to around #75 and the next one comes in again we may get the 4th pick in there.  Perhaps it depends on who is available late in the draft.  If no reasonable prospects we keep a spot open for the SSP (Harley Bennell) or a DFA (Harley Bennell) ;).

2 hours ago, Lord Travis said:

Luke Jackson in frame for pick 3. See him as a forward option. Don't see him as a full-time ruckman at AFL level. If we drafted him, would be playing with the forward group.

Interesting!

 

 

If he can become a KPF and hes as talented as people are saying, take him at pick 3.  You cant put a price on a superstar key forward.  We havent had one since Neitz.

Always take the talent.   We didnt when we took the robotic Weideman, and missed out on Charlie Curnow.

Edited by JakovichScissorKick


1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Interesting how he mentioned Robertson and Kemp around that pick 8 mark.

I honestly think without the bid of Green at the 3 its out of Jackson and Young.

I wonder if he is saying Jackson to force Freo to deal on 8 with a promise not to take Jackson.

Interesting Luke Jackson discussion.  Very raw type still. Potential but footy skills not quite there.  It would be a huge punt at pick 3.  He has the basketball background and his athletic agility is appealing. 
 

If we like 35 players in the draft then 1 or 2 of those might get all the way through to pick 75 if we are very lucky but it makes some sense to me that we'd be looking for a pick in the 40's or around 50 to grab a slider.

 

So in summary....

> Jackson - a likely prospect and seriously considering him but not with pick 3.  More interested in Young & Green (obviously expecting GWS to snaffle him though).

>  Pick 8 - we might be more willing to target a specific player 'type' but will all depend on what happens on the night and who is still available at that point (this might also include a late pick swap).

> Bennell - Have taken the first step in a number of steps required before deciding.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Interesting how he mentioned Robertson and Kemp around that pick 8 mark.

I honestly think without the bid of Green at the 3 its out of Jackson and Young.

 

7D8EA6DC-D33F-4612-9111-8B17FCAFA933.jpeg


Cannot believe we would take Luke Jackson at 3 or even 8. Cannot kick and barely knows the game. Would be going on raw athleticism but this won't help our side one bit next year.

4 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

So in summary....

> Jackson - a likely prospect and seriously considering him but not with pick 3.  More interested in Young & Green (obviously expecting GWS to snaffle him though).

>  Pick 8 - we might be more willing to target a specific player 'type' but will all depend on what happens on the night and who is still available at that point (this might also include a late pick swap).

> Bennell - Have taken the first step in a number of steps required before deciding.

Perhaps I misheard, but I reckon he said Jackson is right in the mix at pick 3. I think Twomey must have heard a few rumours, because he was very quick to ask the Jackson question.

  • Author
5 minutes ago, olisik said:

 

7D8EA6DC-D33F-4612-9111-8B17FCAFA933.jpeg

Please don't quote me.

 

Jackson at 3 would be farcical. Sounds like it will be Young which would be a great outcome.

It would be Young and Jackson if we could.

We could go there and celebrate with a pint or two.

Young at 3 and Jackson at 8 If he is still there, otherwise could be Kemp,Serong , Ash, or Weightman at 8


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 198 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies