Jump to content

Featured Replies

6 minutes ago, 3183 Dee said:

They will give GC top two picks for Rowell and Anderson - those kids are best mates and so will be more likely to stick it out up there together.

Or leave together. Or leave separately. 

Retention is their problem not picks. Get them senior players or a retention allowance, not more kids.

Edited by ManDee

 
2 hours ago, Macca said:

It must also be pointed out that we have used our last 3 first round picks on Lever & May

Prior to that we used 2nd round picks on Frost,  Melksham & Hibberd

All good moves in my book regardless of the injuries. 

Draftees like Brayshaw,  Petracca & Hogan all suffered major injuries or setbacks so it works both ways

So what I'm advocating is actually happening. 

Yep, that's what I was saying too.

1 hour ago, A F said:

Yep, that's what I was saying too.

So what do we differ on?

 

20 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

right around time the brownlow coverage starts, via a press release

Thank you. 

27 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

right around time the brownlow coverage starts, via a press release

Yep, the age old release important information/news when everyone is distracted by something else so there's little to no backlash.

Edited by AshleyH30

If it was ever in doubt, then after the NAB League U/18 GF it wont be. Rowell was amazing and they will make sure they deliver his mate with him to make sure they stay together.

Lock it in Ed.

 
1 hour ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

right around time the brownlow coverage starts, via a press release

 

During the red carpet fluff-fest.

6 hours ago, Macca said:

So what do we differ on?

I was saying you couldn't build a list from scratch with only trading away first rounders. But if you plan for it at the top (like say 2004-2005), you have a few decent players around when you get ordinary picks in 2007, 2008 etc.


4 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

right around time the brownlow coverage starts, via a press release

Won't be until a few days after the granny, the AFL know how to manage the media so after the results have died down a bit they'll bank on a heap of uproar/talk about the PP

1 hour ago, A F said:

I was saying you couldn't build a list from scratch with only trading away first rounders. But if you plan for it at the top (like say 2004-2005), you have a few decent players around when you get ordinary picks in 2007, 2008 etc.

I believe it was RPFC who stated that our recruiting woes started from the early 2000's and I reckon he's right.

Hard to remember back that far but you build for the super-list from a position of strength.

But we sat back,  our good players got old and before you know it we were in for a total rebuild with a rookie coach and a meddling CEO.

A recipe for disaster.  We went all-in with drafting and the rest is history

Think I'm right in saying that only 2 players remain who were drafted before 2010

 An ageing Jones and Jetta who is now struggling with injury

We actually need some more experienced talent who could help out for a few years.  Free agents & RFA's who can actually play AF.

1 hour ago, Macca said:

I believe it was RPFC who stated that our recruiting woes started from the early 2000's and I reckon he's right.

Hard to remember back that far but you build for the super-list from a position of strength.

But we sat back,  our good players got old and before you know it we were in for a total rebuild with a rookie coach and a meddling CEO.

A recipe for disaster.  We went all-in with drafting and the rest is history

Think I'm right in saying that only 2 players remain who were drafted before 2010

 An ageing Jones and Jetta who is now struggling with injury

We actually need some more experienced talent who could help out for a few years.  Free agents & RFA's who can actually play AF.

Fair enough and agree with all of that.

1 hour ago, Red and Blue realist said:

Won't be until a few days after the granny, the AFL know how to manage the media so after the results have died down a bit they'll bank on a heap of uproar/talk about the PP

Would seem that they’re going down this path if they don’t announce it today

Generally speaking it’s always been announced as a ‘no’ on brownlow night, so maybe if it’s a ‘yes’ to the pointy end priority pick they’re looking to maximise the media exposure 

2 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

Would seem that they’re going down this path if they don’t announce it today

Generally speaking it’s always been announced as a ‘no’ on brownlow night, so maybe if it’s a ‘yes’ to the pointy end priority pick they’re looking to maximise the media exposure 

Great, this year keeps on giving us s#$*


13 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

should be announced today

Just announced on SBS during an ad break while they were showing a Slovakian soap opera. 

14 minutes ago, Deeman said:

Just announced on SBS during an ad break while they were showing a Slovakian soap opera. 

They gave them our pick 2?

 

It doesn’t matter if we have Pick 2 or 3.

In the end, the Dees will end up with Ben King. 

3 minutes ago, Dee tention said:

It doesn’t matter if we have Pick 2 or 3.

In the end, the Dees will end up with Ben King. 

How do you know that?

4 minutes ago, Dee tention said:

It doesn’t matter if we have Pick 2 or 3.

In the end, the Dees will end up with Ben King. 

Your opinion or you have a legitimate source?


3 minutes ago, deebug said:

How do you know that?

 

2 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Your opinion or you have a legitimate source?

It’s my opinion...

I think the writing is on the wall with Ben King. GC might as well deal him this year for a premium.

GWS will be involved as well! Keen to get there hands on the Dees Pick and will pay the price. 

 

9 minutes ago, ChaserJ said:

Interesting about Crouch Chaser. Would he be worth the Suns’ late first rounder (17 as it stands) in your opinion? You’d think the Crows would play a bit of hardball. If indeed it does eventuate, adding Ellis and possibly Crouch along with Picks 1 & 2 would have them improving next year one would think.

 

Gil just said that the decision around Gold Coast support has been made by the commission and that the details will be released on Monday after the Grad Final. When pressed by Gerrard Whateley, he said that the decision was not a particularly hard one and that all at the AFL supported the recommendations. 

My reading from it - pick 2 is off to the Gold Coast. 

9 minutes ago, Tough Kent said:

Gil just said that the decision around Gold Coast support has been made by the commission and that the details will be released on Monday after the Grad Final. When pressed by Gerrard Whateley, he said that the decision was not a particularly hard one and that all at the AFL supported the recommendations. 

My reading from it - pick 2 is off to the Gold Coast. 

If true, I hope that we have got something from the AFL, for our loss and it is our loss made a little less if,  we trade 3 to someone.

There is no doubt at all, that GC have a better list and more upside, than we did, when we were constantly refused PP's.

They have a raft of young talent and if well coached, retained and developed, GC will rise up the ladder quickly, with the addition of several experienced players they apparently are securing this off season.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 29 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 239 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies