Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Please post your full phantom draft, preferably up to at least pick 60, by the weekend. Might be great to CC it to Jason Taylor too, because clearly your credentials are imposing for him and he'll take notice.

I'll then look forward to waiting 3-4 years before we all utterly pull up apart your selections.

Cheers.

 

LordNev - as I’ve said to @Moonshadow and a couple of others, if you can come up with $200k/p.a and have JT sit out of the job for three years I will halt what I’m currently doing and give it a red hot crack. Until that can be arranged I’ll continue to critique from the terraces like any keen observer. 

You make it sound as though I think our recruiting team gets every decision wrong. Not the case at all. I just don’t feel we get enough right.

 
35 minutes ago, Matsuo Basho said:

LordNev - as I’ve said to @Moonshadow and a couple of others, if you can come up with $200k/p.a and have JT sit out of the job for three years I will halt what I’m currently doing and give it a red hot crack. Until that can be arranged I’ll continue to critique from the terraces like any keen observer. 

You make it sound as though I think our recruiting team gets every decision wrong. Not the case at all. I just don’t feel we get enough right.

The point is though, you're happy to be Captain Hindsight and pot decisions made by professionals, yet you're seemingly too scared to actually put forth your opinions based on future predictions. If you're not already in a recruitment role, despite apparently wanting the income, I'm not sure why you feel the need to continually bash decisions made by far more qualified people.

I honestly would be really keen to hear your thoughts on whom we should draft this year. You seem to be really into it, and I've not followed the draft that closely the last couple of years.

 

Nice to see some balanced and thoughtful posts on a thread about OMac. Refreshing. 

 
42 minutes ago, Matsuo Basho said:

LordNev - as I’ve said to @Moonshadow and a couple of others, if you can come up with $200k/p.a and have JT sit out of the job for three years I will halt what I’m currently doing and give it a red hot crack. Until that can be arranged I’ll continue to critique from the terraces like any keen observer. 

I'd really prefer if you didn't. I'm not prepared for another 20 years in the bottom 4. I'm happy with JT's list having 1 blip on the radar of their otherwise consistent rise up the ladder

10 hours ago, Matsuo Basho said:

Someone better. Drafting a guy because he’s tall and his brother is good seems like an underwhelming set of criteria to recruit players by. And now five years into it he’s being put on a three week weights program to ‘bulk up’? C’mon let’s get real. 

Freo took Ed Langdon with the very next pick (54) by the way.

Here is the top ten draft picks that year - how many would you class as a success?

With your "'excellent'" use of hindsight, you probably had De Goey as number one back in 2014

As Melbourne supporters well know, getting it right is very difficult for a huge number of reasons

1 Paddy McCartin St Kilda Geelong Falcons TAC Cup  
1 2 Christian Petracca Melbourne Eastern Ranges TAC Cup  
1 3 Angus Brayshaw Melbourne Sandringham Dragons TAC Cup Free agency compensation pick (Frawley)
1 4 Jarrod Pickett Greater Western Sydney South Fremantle WAFL  
1 5 Jordan De Goey Collingwood Oakleigh Chargers TAC Cup Traded from Brisbane Lions
1 6 Caleb Marchbank Greater Western Sydney Murray Bushrangers TAC Cup Traded from Western Bulldogs
1 7 Paul Ahern Greater Western Sydney Calder Cannons TAC Cup Traded from Carlton
1 8 Peter Wright Gold Coast Calder Cannons TAC Cup  
1 9 Darcy Moore Collingwood Oakleigh Chargers TAC Cup Father–son rule selection – son of Peter Moore
1 10 Nakia Cockatoo

2 minutes ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Collingwood did very well ^

And so did we

1 minute ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Collingwood did very well ^

GWS not so well.

And you have to feel for both the Saints and of course even more so for Paddy McMartin.

 
43 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

The point is though, you're happy to be Captain Hindsight and pot decisions made by professionals, yet you're seemingly too scared to actually put forth your opinions based on future predictions. If you're not already in a recruitment role, despite apparently wanting the income, I'm not sure why you feel the need to continually bash decisions made by far more qualified people.

I honestly would be really keen to hear your thoughts on whom we should draft this year. You seem to be really into it, and I've not followed the draft that closely the last couple of years.

 

It’s time consuming and tedious to keep responding to this type of reply. You miss the ‘point’ and I’m not ‘scared’ of anything. I looked at the available data re Taylor’s post-R1 recruiting from 2013-2017 and formed an opinion on it based on that. It was not based on reviewing one year or one particular selection analysed in isolation. I’m not here to thoughtlessly pat people on the back at every opportunity but to praise, critique and if necessary apportion blame according to things as I see them. I’m interested in the success of the MFC and accountability for those in positions of power running it. Nothing more, nothing less. Please look that last italicised word up. It’s an important consideration that some posters aren’t always ready to acknowledge.

Who should we draft this year? Well I’m not even sure we should draft kids in the first two rounds given our mandate to play finals in 2020.  But if we do I’ll leave it to the paid experts to get it right. That’s all you can do as supporter is it not? That and opine on footy forums and such.

2 minutes ago, Matsuo Basho said:

It’s time consuming and tedious to keep responding to this type of reply. You miss the ‘point’ and I’m not ‘scared’ of anything. I looked at the available data re Taylor’s post-R1 recruiting from 2013-2017 and formed an opinion on it based on that. It was not based on reviewing one year or one particular selection analysed in isolation. I’m not here to thoughtlessly pat people on the back at every opportunity but to praise, critique and if necessary apportion blame according to things as I see them. I’m interested in the success of the MFC and accountability for those in positions of power running it. Nothing more, nothing less. Please look that last italicised word up. It’s an important consideration that some posters aren’t always ready to acknowledge.

Who should we draft this year? Well I’m not even sure we should draft kids in the first two rounds given our mandate to play finals in 2020.  But if we do I’ll leave it to the paid experts to get it right. That’s all you can do as supporter is it not? That and opine on footy forums and such.

Yes, it is tedious indeed. I hope this is a bit of a full stop to the barrage of posts about the matter then. Perhaps we can get onto being constructive about it? (Hence my question about this year's draftees).

I'll look forward to your 2019 phantom draft in 2020 then. Cheers.

 


1 hour ago, Fatmanblues883 said:

Here is the top ten draft picks that year - how many would you class as a success?

With your "'excellent'" use of hindsight, you probably had De Goey as number one back in 2014

As Melbourne supporters well know, getting it right is very difficult for a huge number of reasons

1 Paddy McCartin St Kilda Geelong Falcons TAC Cup  
1 2 Christian Petracca Melbourne Eastern Ranges TAC Cup  
1 3 Angus Brayshaw Melbourne Sandringham Dragons TAC Cup Free agency compensation pick (Frawley)
1 4 Jarrod Pickett Greater Western Sydney South Fremantle WAFL  
1 5 Jordan De Goey Collingwood Oakleigh Chargers TAC Cup Traded from Brisbane Lions
1 6 Caleb Marchbank Greater Western Sydney Murray Bushrangers TAC Cup Traded from Western Bulldogs
1 7 Paul Ahern Greater Western Sydney Calder Cannons TAC Cup Traded from Carlton
1 8 Peter Wright Gold Coast Calder Cannons TAC Cup  
1 9 Darcy Moore Collingwood Oakleigh Chargers TAC Cup Father–son rule selection – son of Peter Moore
1 10 Nakia Cockatoo

Looks like we got 2 of the best 3, so pretty good I would have thought.

12 hours ago, Matsuo Basho said:

Someone better. Drafting a guy because he’s tall and his brother is good seems like an underwhelming set of criteria to recruit players by. And now five years into it he’s being put on a three week weights program to ‘bulk up’? C’mon let’s get real. 

Freo took Ed Langdon with the very next pick (54) by the way.

Fake news.

2 hours ago, Matsuo Basho said:

LordNev - as I’ve said to @Moonshadow and a couple of others, if you can come up with $200k/p.a and have JT sit out of the job for three years I will halt what I’m currently doing and give it a red hot crack. Until that can be arranged I’ll continue to critique from the terraces like any keen observer. 

You make it sound as though I think our recruiting team gets every decision wrong. Not the case at all. I just don’t feel we get enough right.

Both a cop-out and narsascistic at the same time. Well done!

1 hour ago, Fatmanblues883 said:

Here is the top ten draft picks that year - how many would you class as a success?

With your "'excellent'" use of hindsight, you probably had De Goey as number one back in 2014

As Melbourne supporters well know, getting it right is very difficult for a huge number of reasons

1 Paddy McCartin St Kilda Geelong Falcons TAC Cup  
1 2 Christian Petracca Melbourne Eastern Ranges TAC Cup  
1 3 Angus Brayshaw Melbourne Sandringham Dragons TAC Cup Free agency compensation pick (Frawley)
1 4 Jarrod Pickett Greater Western Sydney South Fremantle WAFL  
1 5 Jordan De Goey Collingwood Oakleigh Chargers TAC Cup Traded from Brisbane Lions
1 6 Caleb Marchbank Greater Western Sydney Murray Bushrangers TAC Cup Traded from Western Bulldogs
1 7 Paul Ahern Greater Western Sydney Calder Cannons TAC Cup Traded from Carlton
1 8 Peter Wright Gold Coast Calder Cannons TAC Cup  
1 9 Darcy Moore Collingwood Oakleigh Chargers TAC Cup Father–son rule selection – son of Peter Moore
1 10 Nakia Cockatoo

If you’ve read my posts about Taylor’s recruiting you would know that my criticisms fall on his post-R1 recruiting. Most clubs have the top 10-20 very similarly configured heading into each draft. It’s picks 20 - 60 and rookie draft where the seriously keen eyed scouts earn their pay packets. 

That said, Weid (9) over Curnow (11) in 2015 was an incredible balls up by Taylor. Following in a long tradition of intermittent MFC stuff ups at the pointy end. 2007 Morton/Dangerfield&Rioli, 2008 Watts/Naitanui, 2009 Scullgove/Dusty and Gysberts/Talia, 2010 Cook/Darling, 2012 Toumpas/Wines, 2013 Josh Kelly trade, 2014. Etc etc.


50 minutes ago, Matsuo Basho said:

If you’ve read my posts about Taylor’s recruiting you would know that my criticisms fall on his post-R1 recruiting. Most clubs have the top 10-20 very similarly configured heading into each draft. It’s picks 20 - 60 and rookie draft where the seriously keen eyed scouts earn their pay packets. 

That said, Weid (9) over Curnow (11) in 2015 was an incredible balls up by Taylor. Following in a long tradition of intermittent MFC stuff ups at the pointy end. 2007 Morton/Dangerfield&Rioli, 2008 Watts/Naitanui, 2009 Scullgove/Dusty and Gysberts/Talia, 2010 Cook/Darling, 2012 Toumpas/Wines, 2013 Josh Kelly trade, 2014. Etc etc.

Or the selection of an overweight country kid who couldn’t even get a guernsey for the Nationals Champs at pick 4. 

2 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Or the selection of an overweight country kid who couldn’t even get a guernsey for the Nationals Champs at pick 4. 

Definitely one in the plus column.

The angst towards Omac is ridiculous. 

I am happy the club is investing time trying to help him recapture form. 

 

On 6/23/2019 at 9:01 PM, binman said:

Omac has a contract for 2020. Not going  anywhere. He will be back in the ones soon enough.

No he wont, for the many reasons already stated on this site!!

5 minutes ago, picket fence said:

No he wont, for the many reasons already stated on this site!!

Demonland does not have a good strike rate for predicting contract renewals.  

There wouldn’t be a single player on our list who hasn’t been a ‘delist’ or ‘trade for zero or nearest offer’


5 hours ago, Webber said:

To state the obvious, this is an unpopular opinion on here, but I think Oscar is a more naturally talented ball player than his brother. He’s also subject to the same slumps of confidence, and we’ve seen what that’s done to Tom this season. People forget very quickly that for most of last year, he was one of the first ten players picked each week, based on form, and we played in a prelim. Finals-experienced 23 year olds having form slumps don’t just get tossed aside. Yes, he could be bigger and stronger, but that can be worked on. I don’t doubt he will be groomed as a key forward over the next couple of years. Thankfully the club has a more logical perspective than Demonland,  exceptions granted. 

Well said, I am really glad the Club are taking this line with developing young players. Shows a bit more foresight than some people.

17 hours ago, Matsuo Basho said:

It won’t matter how big or small they make his physique, he doesn’t have the agility and athleticism necessary to succeed at this level. He is a VFL or A grade amateur footballer. There is no shame in that. Everybody needs to accept it and move on. 

Oscar for me is Exhibit A on why you should never just automatically draft one of your better player’s brothers. He was never going to make it as an AFL key defender with his obvious limitations. Waste of a draft pick.

Do you know that he was drafted because he was Tom's bro?   Were you told that by someone in our recruiting department?  Or perhaps at the time he appeared to be the next best pick?

17 hours ago, Lord Nev said:

Imagine constantly potting a player for not developing, building his strength, having good form, and then an article comes out explaining he's been doing those very things midseason, in a club infamous for poor development no less, and you take the opportunity to pot him yet again (on the internet).

Our supporter culture is often as toxic as the club culture that's been worked on so hard.

 

Never let the facts spoil a good put down Nev.

IMO kudos on the club for trying something completely different.

17 hours ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

Good idea I think, I’m sure as much about mental strength and resilience as physical capabilities 

Actually I think he has shown great mental strength surviving all the excrement that some here seem to enjoy piling upon him (if he reads it, or hears about it).

Edited by monoccular

42 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Actually I think he has shown great mental strength surviving all the excrement that some here seem to enjoy piling upon him (if he reads it, or hears about it).

How does not rating a player become delight in saying so? I’ve never understood this perception by posters such as yourself. Where do you pull that conclusion from? I can’t speak for others but I never feel that way when negatively critiquing a player.

So why do you write it? Please explain.

 
10 minutes ago, Matsuo Basho said:

How does not rating a player become delight in saying so? I’ve never understood this perception by posters such as yourself. Where do you pull that conclusion from? I can’t speak for others but I never feel that way when negatively critiquing a player.

So why do you write it? Please explain.

Can we move the 'forensic analysis' of personal philosophies of online forum etiquette  to another thread please?

Edited by Engorged Onion


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 133 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 403 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies