Jump to content

Featured Replies

32 minutes ago, Redleg said:

 

The main point of my post is that at pick 4 you should be able to pick a player not a dud.

The year before GWS selected Will Hoskin-Elliott at Pick 4 and ended up trading him away for not much more then we got in our Toumpas trade. There's no certainty in drafting.

Plus what we got in the Toumpas/Howe trade went towards our trade for the Oliver pick. So thank god we drafted Toumpas!?

 
13 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

he gives away frees all the time. a couple of times last night he was penalised for holding. also how angry does he get when things don't go his way? Id hate to see how he was as a kid when his parents said no to him.  

When you have god on your side, it is natural to assume that an umpire who awards a free against you is a pawn of Satan.

As for his dive last night, I think it was there, just not as blatant as last week.  Though why dives are considered fine-worthy but head ducking (which is dangerous) is not, is beyond my comprehension.

Edited by sue

3 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

Softens? Oliver is far superior to Wines.

I wasn't suggesting otherwise

Edited by DavidNeitz9

 
1 hour ago, dees189227 said:

 

On Rance I don't think he took another dive but gee Im telling you put him 1 on 1 and he gives away frees all the time. a couple of times last night he was penalised for holding. also how angry does he get when things don't go his way? Id hate to see how he was as a kid when his parents said no to him. 

Anyway melbourne please win because 2nd spot would look good. 

They might have never said no to him...strikes me as that type of kid.

3 hours ago, Gorgoroth said:

It was his grand final... 

I was so surprised when I found out he had a wife and kids...

So was Bruce. Is there nothing ch7 cannot do? (Other than football commentary)

Edited by Return to Glory


Which Scott brother am I supporting?

1 minute ago, danielE288 said:

Which Scott brother am I supporting?

Big game...  both teams 7-4 and the loser will be on the edge of the 8.

Really its just a case of who you hate worst as to who you want to lose.... at least one of them will be in the 8 at seasons end, and its hard to see Geelong not making it.  So I wouldn't mind seeing North lose today and begin their slide down the ladder.

 I hate them both equally.

 

2 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

Big game...  both teams 7-4 and the loser will be on the edge of the 8.

Really its just a case of who you hate worst as to who you want to lose.... at least one of them will be in the 8 at seasons end, and its hard to see Geelong not making it.  So I wouldn't mind seeing North lose today and begin their slide down the ladder.

 I hate them both equally.

 

Good response. Thank you.

 
5 hours ago, Redleg said:

But that’s the point, I don’t think he was the right pick at the time . I recall he was injured when we drafted him and he never showed anything over here.  He was rather short and dumpy and was supposed to be an outside mid but was slow. His skills were poor also. I think whether or not we got Ollie he was a poor pick. 

The main point of my post is that at pick 4 you should be able to pick a player not a dud.

In hindsight not the right pick, but I think consensus within industry was that he was the "right" pick. Same with Cale Morton.

Contrast these to Luke Molan (yes very unlucky once drafted but was never expected to be a top 10 player: read here for some of his bad luck http://websites.sportstg.com/assoc_page.cgi?c=1-25-0-0-0&sID=56257&articleID=7430876&news_task=DETAIL) or Nick Smith (the original 426, won played his 4th and last game in our last final, but who more relevantly was picked higher than expected ahead of some more credentialed forwards). 

Yep we got it wrong and could have been braver (like we were with Oliver), but mistakes like Toumpas and Watts are difficult to avoid based on exposed juniors form. 


Just got told by someone close with GWS That Tom lynch toured facilities there this morning, that’s interesting they would need to drop a player to get lynch maybe Patton might end up on the table 

  • Author
1 minute ago, brendan said:

Just got told by someone close with GWS That Tom lynch toured facilities there this morning, that’s interesting they would need to drop a player to get lynch maybe Patton might end up on the table 

Was it the opposition change rooms he was spotted in at all? 

Just now, Ethan Tremblay said:

Was it the opposition change rooms he was spotted in at all? 

No idea was just very early this morning, strange he would be there that early but probably nothing in it 

2 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

North just will not die

it’s so irksome!!

Geelong is the team i wish would just go away. Every year i think nope, .....but, like a dog at a rubbish bin, now theyve won 4 in a row. Top 4 now.

Edited by Wadda We Sing

0 goals for Ben Brown,   0 goals for Josh Caddy,  Darling  0 the last 2 weeks and out injured.

Jesse is well and truly in the frame to win the Coleman.


2 minutes ago, Petraccattack said:

0 goals for Ben Brown,   0 goals for Josh Caddy,  Darling  0 the last 2 weeks and out injured.

Jesse is well and truly in the frame to win the Coleman.

Hes come in from 13/1 to 8/1 in the blink of an eye on Ladbrokes.

21 minutes ago, Wadda We Sing said:

Geelong is the team i wish would just go away. Every year i think nope, .....but, like a dog at a rubbish bin, now theyve won 4 in a row. Top 4 now.

I wish Nought would cease to exist

we only want one Melbourne Thankyou

13 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I wish Nought would cease to exist

we only want one Melbourne Thankyou


Not long to wait. Swans went from South Melbourne to Extremely North Melbourne.

Kangas will soon be Extremely South Melbourne

 

18 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I wish Nought would cease to exist

we only want one Melbourne Thankyou

I wasnt disagreeing with you, i was just pointing out how Geelong just wont go away either.


Scrappy first quarter at the spiritual home of footy, Spotless Stadium. 

Both teams look overwhelmed by the big stage and the rich history of their clashes. 

Game should pick up if they’re anything like the epic clashes of yesteryear. 

6 hours ago, Kumamoto_Ken said:

They might have never said no to him...strikes me as that type of kid.

They would have got sick of picking up the toys when they came flying out of the cot.?

24 minutes ago, wizardinoz said:

They would have got sick of picking up the toys when they came flying out of the cot.?

Dunno about that. He's not that good at one on one. Reckon they would have given him a spanking.

 
1 hour ago, wizardinoz said:

Norf gone. Suck it up Duck.

They have a soft run home. 

Percentage booster for the Giants....boring!

Never ever have we wanted a weekend to end as quickly as we want this one to end. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 170 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 46 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Like
    • 31 replies