Jump to content

Featured Replies

54 minutes ago, Adzman said:

We haven't used a 1st round pick for 3 drafts now (2016 Hannan in 3rd, round, 2017 Spargo in 2nd round, 2018 Sparrow in 2nd round) which means we are not in a position to trade out our 1st round pick in 2019 for Langdon (we we're able to go 3 drafts in a row because we took 2x 1st in 2015 which were Clarry and Weed. 

Collingwood can give up a first round pick, so they are in the box seat at the trade table.

He would be a great fit for us, but the Collingwood FC will find a way to get this deal done.

Unless we get permission from the AFL, which other clubs have done in the recent past.

All AFL rules are subjective and flexible

 
1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

Unless we get permission from the AFL, which other clubs have done in the recent past.

All AFL rules are subjective and flexible

Knowing them though Moon, we’ll be the first one’s they say no to.

19 hours ago, DV8 said:

 

It's interesting that last years Trade and Draft period,  when we were after  sMay...  So were the Pies, big time. 

..... Then,  the Pies mysteriously vanished from the  sMay  negotiations.  

 

they didn't vanish they got turned down 

 

I don't think he is actually any good. I have watched him closely since mid last year when rumours started about him coming to Melbourne. His skills are not flash. Decision making isnt either. What do others see that i dont? 

Edited by phuket demon
Typo

Won’t be a first - mid second maybe early depending on his year. Zac Jones is expecting an early to mid second and you’d think Langdon would be slightly behind. 


2 minutes ago, phuket demon said:

I don't he is actually any good. I have watched him closely since mid last year when rumours started about him coming to Melbourne. His skills are not flash. Decision making isnt either. What do others see that i dont? 

Seconded.

He is fast but lacks in ball use, class and doesn't hit the scoreboard enough as a small forward.

 

6 minutes ago, Dee-licious said:

Won’t be a first - mid second maybe early depending on his year. Zac Jones is expecting an early to mid second and you’d think Langdon would be slightly behind. 

Don’t forget, they have the trading genius in Bell. Will demand at least 3 first rounders for him, just wait

11 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Seconded.

He is fast but lacks in ball use, class and doesn't hit the scoreboard enough as a small forward.

 

He's not a small forward though. He is a winger that plays high half-forward and occasionally half-back.

 
2 hours ago, markc said:

they didn't vanish they got turned down 

By who.


Doesn't get the juices flowing for me.  Strikes me as a bloke with a little more pace than our current midfield but slightly worse skills.  I'm not sure it is what we need.

1 hour ago, Brayshaw Self said:

He's not a small forward though. He is a winger that plays high half-forward and occasionally half-back.

I watched him play as a small forward last year. 

Don't know about this year. Perhaps part of the positional changes are due to the fact that he is yet to do well in any of them. 

We should target both Z Jones and Langdon to play on either wing

Then Fritsch can play forward or back and we have a replacement for Lewis 

21 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

I watched him play as a small forward last year. 

Don't know about this year. Perhaps part of the positional changes are due to the fact that he is yet to do well in any of them. 

I know it doesn't prove anything but you can see his possession numbers and rebound 50s are higher than you'd ever expect from a small forward. I was watching him closely all season and he was up the ground as much as any of their mids.

Screen Shot 2019-04-20 at 11.38.28 AM.png

he's not a small forward; he's a wingman / rebounding flanker

handy player who breaks lines and tackles well, but has a tendency to spray it of the boot

given that we gave up second rounders for melksham and hibberd, i'd put him BELOW their value, so maybe something like straight third rounder OR our second for langdon and freo's third / fourth rounder could work?


17 disposals to half time, at 94% DE. Very handy.

Edit: 27 at 88% early in the last

Edited by Good Lord George

1 hour ago, Good Lord George said:

17 disposals to half time, at 94% DE. Very handy.

Edit: 27 at 88% early in the last

Ends with 32 at 90% DE.

On 4/19/2019 at 2:07 PM, stevethemanjordan said:

I watched him play as a small forward last year. 

Don't know about this year. Perhaps part of the positional changes are due to the fact that he is yet to do well in any of them. 

He played on a wing last year too.

  • 3 weeks later...

On 4/20/2019 at 5:01 PM, Good Lord George said:

Ends with 32 at 90% DE.

Yes. 32 disposals at 90% efficiency.  

Why are people questioning his disposal quality???? 

He is a fast skilled wingman who runs hard and tackles hard.  

Definitely do a trade as 

Landgon and Freo 2020 3rd Round

for MFC 2020 1st round pick. 

 
2 hours ago, rjay said:

Should have been part of the Hogan deal...

Hogan and our 2018 2nd rounder (or 2019 2nd rounder) for 6 and EL would have been a good outcome.

In: May, KK and Langdon 

Out: Hogan and 2nd rounder

Oh well, sai la vie!

Edited by Moonshadow

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 95 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 26 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 300 replies