Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

I think we should be targeting Mitch Wallis, who is a year older and on the outer at the Dogs apparently and will come a lot cheaper. If you can get both great.

Basically the same player as Tyson. Just has worse skills but a better tackler.

 
4 hours ago, MSFebey said:

I can't find the interview now, but earlier in the season Mahoney said we definitely had enough space for one star and maybe even two. Giddy up.

If we get Gaff and Steven May you can pencil us in for the next 5 flags.

Apparently Gaff has been offered a 6 year deal at WCE and a 7 year deal at a Victorian based club. That’d have to be North I presume

 

Jeremy McGovern signed up for 5 years at $1.2m per year! $6m in total. No way they keep Gaff based on that?

That ridiculous McGovern deal could have been done as they’ve found out Gaff is leaving. They don’t want both to leave so they offer overs. 

I wonder how Kennedy and Sheuy feel about that cash?


17 minutes ago, MSFebey said:

Jeremy McGovern signed up for 5 years at $1.2m per year! $6m in total. No way they keep Gaff based on that?

Thats insane.

Thats the kind of contract you give to the likes of Dustin Martin, Buddy Franklin and very soon,  Clayton Oliver.

3 hours ago, Dr.D said:

yeah, probably. i mean most of his kicks are pretty easy spot up kicks with not much risk attached. he probably cant kick too much further than 50m. I'd just much prefer to grab a key defender and alleviate the oscar mcdonald effect than to get an outside midfielder. if anyrhing i'd go for aaron hall and would almost prefer him at his money

You really don't watch much football involving WCE, do you. The guy hits up targets regularly, including longer kicks.

Previously an outside player, Gaff has taken his game to another level this year with improved inside work as well as 1%ers. If I was a betting person I'd be putting money on the double of him winning another B&F and finishing top 3 in the Brownlow.

He's exactly what we need.

Edited by Moonshadow

 
31 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Would anyone here rather keep the cash and wait to see if we can get Kelly?

I'd rather we keep the cash and give Clarry a 10-year mega deal.

3 hours ago, Watts the matter said:

Basically the same player as Tyson. Just has worse skills but a better tackler.

Wallis has skill Tyson doesn’t. 


12 hours ago, Watts the matter said:

What skill would that be?

He is very vanilla. 

He can handball and kick to a team mate for starters. He can make a decision within 2 minutes and not get caught holding the ball. He can kick a goal, 3 recently in a game. He can take a contested mark. He is a better player than Tyson. 

2 minutes ago, Redleg said:

He can handball and kick to a team mate for starters. He can make a decision within 2 minutes and not get caught holding the ball. He can kick a goal, 3 recently in a game. He can take a contested mark. He is a better player than Tyson. 

That covers a big group Mr. Leg

Just now, old dee said:

That covers a big group Mr. Leg

Yes but he is in it and available free. If you got Gaff and Wallis, you would be gaining better players and with experience,  to help our young midfield. 

15 hours ago, Petraccattack said:

Thats insane.

Thats the kind of contract you give to the likes of Dustin Martin, Buddy Franklin and very soon,  Clayton Oliver.

only if you believe the "reported" figure

they are generally exaggerated for click bait


38 minutes ago, Redleg said:

He can handball and kick to a team mate for starters. He can make a decision within 2 minutes and not get caught holding the ball. He can kick a goal, 3 recently in a game. He can take a contested mark. He is a better player than Tyson. 

I don't think he's up upgrade at all 'Red'...

Just a small example of his work.

"Mitch Wallis’ decision to ignore a short pass to Mitch Honeychurch and go longer to Gowers inside the last minute backfired, with his kick going out on the full and North then going coast-to-coast from the ensuing back pocket free kick."

I think we will be looking at other avenues, he will be a good pick up for Carlton.

45 minutes ago, Redleg said:

He can handball and kick to a team mate for starters. He can make a decision within 2 minutes and not get caught holding the ball. He can kick a goal, 3 recently in a game. He can take a contested mark. He is a better player than Tyson. 

I would think so; Tyson seems to need the game played in slow motion these days, for him to get the ball away.

13 minutes ago, DV8 said:

I would think so; Tyson seems to need the game played in slow motion these days, for him to get the ball away.

he seems to think he can play like pendlebury and hold the ball as long as likes

Can anyone tell me how the matching of offers works?

If we offer a short term contract on mega dollars, say $3mill for 2 years with a verbal agreement that his next contract would be 4 years at $400-450 thousand per year. We're essentially matching WC's 6 years at $800,000. (These numbers are theoretical and unimportant, I don't want to argue the specifics, I'm interested in the mechanics.). Would our offer render the Eagles 6 year offer redundant and force them to match our 2 year offer?

Our list is younger than theirs and could probably afford to take a bigger hit in the short term and it leaves more space when we have to re-sign our young stars on better dollars. Gaff also gets a big portion of his 6 years with us paid upfront which he can invest to make even more $'s over his contract length. 

I'm pretty sure Luke Ball did something similar to get to Collingwood in the draft. Nominated a massive 2 year price for himself with a verbal agreement to accept less on his next contract. 

Edited by furious d
punctuation


56 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

he seems to think he can play like pendlebury and hold the ball as long as likes

I think he 'Tyson' lacks 'the vision', that Oliver has.   Oliver seems to have great spacial perception... in that he knows where players are prior to bounce.   a sort of photo-graphic memory of the area, immediately prior to taking the ball.

 

You need this when driving fast in heavy traffic...  to reinforce your judgement/perception.  

Without it, all confidence goes down the drain when under pressure.

 

He is another who should take up juggling.  And master it...  and then in the dark,  or dimly lit room.

 

The idea is to be able to focus on an object whilst moving thru traffic, or chairs...  to sort of, devide the spacial perception... to be able to focus on the ball, whilst another part of the brain focus's away from the ball, on other objects about.

- - - - - - - -

 

but this won't help his work-rate or running abilities.

Edited by DV8

15 minutes ago, furious d said:

Can anyone tell me how the matching of offers works?

If we offer a short term contract on mega dollars, say $3mill for 2 years with a verbal agreement that his next contract would be 4 years at $400-450 thousand per year. We're essentially matching WC's 6 years at $800,000. (These numbers are theoretical and unimportant, I don't want to argue the specifics, I'm interested in the mechanics.). Would our offer render the Eagles 6 year offer redundant and force them to match our 2 year offer?

Our list is younger than theirs and could probably afford to take a bigger hit in the short term and it leaves more space when we have to re-sign our young stars on better dollars. Gaff also gets a big portion of his 6 years with us paid upfront which he can invest to make even more $'s over his contract length. 

I'm pretty sure Luke Ball did something similar to get to Collingwood in the draft. Nominated a massive 2 year price for himself with a verbal agreement to accept less on his next contract. 

whatever gaff's nominated club offers has to be matched in $s and no of years - simple

it's not an auction

24 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

whatever gaff's nominated club offers has to be matched in $s and no of years - simple

it's not an auction

There's been no matching to date. Can't see a Club stopping a player who's out of contract from going home etc. If it was us they would get a better pick by letting it happen than trying to do a trade. I think they'll end up about 4th or 5th after finals. I would say  their compensation will be a band 1 which would be the first pick after their first pick which if they finish 5th after finals would be pick 14. A better result than any deal they could do with us if they threatened to match. A pretty reasonable compensation for him. 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PODCAST: Essendon

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 14th April @ the all new time of 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect another Demons loss at Kardinia Park to the Cats in the Round 04. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 23 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Fremantle

    The Demons return home to the MCG in search of their first win for the 2025 Premiership season when they take on the Fremantle Dockers on Saturday afternoon. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 59 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Essendon

    Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year ahead of Clayton Oliver, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Jake Bowey. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

    • 21 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Essendon

    Despite a spirited third quarter surge, the Demons have slumped to their worst start to a season since 2012, remaining winless and second last on the ladder after a 39-point defeat to Essendon at Adelaide Oval in Gather Round.

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 245 replies
    Demonland
  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Thanks
    • 723 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the  Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measly 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland