Jump to content

Featured Replies

32 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

OUT: 1st round pick, Tyson
IN: Lever, 2nd round.

Something around that ball park should satisfy Adelaide. 

That's quite frankly ridiculous.

 
49 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

OUT: 1st round pick, Tyson
IN: Lever, 2nd round.

Something around that ball park should satisfy Adelaide. 

Tyson won't leave melbourne, we won't trade him. 

Even if they offered a straight swap

13 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Pick 12 which we gave to Geelong for Beamer

Who did Geelong get for our pick 12?

 
4 minutes ago, jackaub said:

Who did Geelong get for our pick 12?

From memory Geelong used that pick to get Brad Ottens from Richmond

from a crows' supporting mate who is increasingly concerned they're losing lever, mcgovern and cameron at the end of the year:
 

Quote

Conspiracy Theory - Lever gone to Pies. Some one commented this morning on a non-related photo of his dad's "yay black & white" to which his dad liked

 


41 minutes ago, McQueen said:

That's quite frankly ridiculous.

Why?

Everyone is suggesting we trade 1st rounder + ANB for Lever. If the roles were reversed, and the Crows were offering a 1st rounder + a player of ANB's caliber for Oliver would we take it?

Of course not. People need to take off their rose coloured glasses and start coming up with realistic trade options. Lever is a future captain, AA defender. Someone like Tyson is an accumulator with hardly any damaging disposals. It's a matter of need over want. 

15 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

From memory Geelong used that pick to get Brad Ottens from Richmond

and we got the average brother yet again...

For the first time in a very long time i have complete faith in the judgement of the football department when it comes to recruitment and trades.

Whilst there a many factors at play (eg pay scales, contract status of list, culture, perceived risk of lever continuing to suffer hammy injuries, refusal to pay overs etc) their offer to lever will give us an indication of a couple of things (assuming of course we get wind of the ball park figure and length of contract).

It will give some objective measure of how highly they rate lever and also of where they see their most need. On the second point it will be interesting to see who they target if they dont land lever.

If collingwood get him they will be paying overs, as they did with mayne. Happy for the dees to nor get in a bidding war with the pies

 
34 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

Why?

Everyone is suggesting we trade 1st rounder + ANB for Lever. If the roles were reversed, and the Crows were offering a 1st rounder + a player of ANB's caliber for Oliver would we take it?

Of course not. People need to take off their rose coloured glasses and start coming up with realistic trade options. Lever is a future captain, AA defender. Someone like Tyson is an accumulator with hardly any damaging disposals. It's a matter of need over want. 

Let's just deal with facts for now rather than individual Utopian views. 

So let's say it'll be pick 10 and Tyson for Lever and pick 36.

Tyson has his knockers about butchering the pill a bit but there's no doubt he's one of our best ball winners in the team. I think Dom has got immense improvement left in him and is a key player type to execute our game plan.

Lever looks great and probably deserves our first rounder but not one of our top line mids as well - I wouldn't even give ANB as part of the deal.

For all of the posters gushing over Lever there's a few that also recognise he plays in a defence that has an AA defender in Talia and another big bloke in Hartigan and a jet in Laird.

I just think you're proposal is way overs mate.

1 hour ago, juzzk1d said:

Why?

Everyone is suggesting we trade 1st rounder + ANB for Lever. If the roles were reversed, and the Crows were offering a 1st rounder + a player of ANB's caliber for Oliver would we take it?

Of course not. People need to take off their rose coloured glasses and start coming up with realistic trade options. Lever is a future captain, AA defender. Someone like Tyson is an accumulator with hardly any damaging disposals. It's a matter of need over want. 

The difference is Lever wants out and is out of contract, if he nominates dees the crows either take what we offer or they get nothing. Its a balancing act as you want to keep a good relationship with other team in case the shoe is ever on the other foot and if he nominated for the draft we would need to use a first round pick anyway, so that becomes the starting point.  Ideally you find a player on our list who is looking for more opportunity and we can afford to lose, a number of our inside mids fill this criteria (ANB the obvious choice, Tyson doesn't as clearly unless you think he is on the way out.) Then add a pick on top and deal done, depending on the quality of the player going with it this would vary but any best 22 player shouldn't need to be paired with a with a round 1

Edited by Garbo


1 hour ago, McQueen said:

Let's just deal with facts for now rather than individual Utopian views. 

So let's say it'll be pick 10 and Tyson for Lever and pick 36.

Tyson has his knockers about butchering the pill a bit but there's no doubt he's one of our best ball winners in the team. I think Dom has got immense improvement left in him and is a key player type to execute our game plan.

Lever looks great and probably deserves our first rounder but not one of our top line mids as well - I wouldn't even give ANB as part of the deal.

For all of the posters gushing over Lever there's a few that also recognise he plays in a defence that has an AA defender in Talia and another big bloke in Hartigan and a jet in Laird.

I just think you're proposal is way overs mate.

I even think its overs. I completely agree. What annoys me is that posters are touting lever as the 'best key defender of all time, a future captain; when he will be in his prime, then going on to just be happy giving Adelaide a 1st round player and steak knives.

2 minutes ago, juzzk1d said:

I even think its overs. I completely agree. What annoys me is that posters are touting lever as the 'best key defender of all time, a future captain; when he will be in his prime, then going on to just be happy giving Adelaide a 1st round player and steak knives.

Sorry mate, I didn't pick up the sarcasm.

3 hours ago, Abe said:

Tyson won't leave melbourne, we won't trade him. 

Even if they offered a straight swap

I would, but agree it won't happen.

Reminds me of 2004 when Scott Thompson requested a trade to SA.

Reluctantly we accepted pick 12 from the Crows and he went on to be an All Australian and play 300+ games.

There's the precedent. 

 

 

17 hours ago, In Gawn we Trust said:

Sorry, visiting the city. Kew more specifically, is what I was told. But again, just a rumour

Kew? Sounds like he's on his way to the MFC then! :D


1 minute ago, A F said:

Kew? Sounds like he's on his way to the MFC then! :D

probably just means it's close to his girlfriend's family

29 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

probably just means it's close to his girlfriend's family

I thought his girlfriend is from SA and he is a Melbourne boy? 

  • Author
6 minutes ago, deebug said:

I thought his girlfriend is from SA and he is a Melbourne boy? 

 

No, she's also from Melbourne and is part of the reason he is weighing up a move back south.

 

 

Just now, stevethemanjordan said:

 

No, she's also from Melbourne and is part of the reason he is weighing up a move back south.

 

 

Ok, thanks must have heard wrong.


42 minutes ago, deebug said:

I thought his girlfriend is from SA and he is a Melbourne boy? 

melbourne girl ,  romsey boy  (but we won't hold that against him)

57 minutes ago, --coach-- said:

Kew is right near Hawthorn! Damn Hawks have their nose in every bloody trough! ????

It's also where the Vineys live.

15 minutes ago, Webber said:

It's also where the Vineys live.

Near Kew or far Kew?

 
2 hours ago, PartyBoy said:

Reminds me of 2004 when Scott Thompson requested a trade to SA.

Reluctantly we accepted pick 12 from the Crows and he went on to be an All Australian and play 300+ games.

There's the precedent. 

 

 

There is no precedent at the MRP, or when the shoe is on the other foot.

Also at the time Scott left, he was seeking a compassionate release for a family issue.

Not sure we ever found out what that issue was, or if there even was one.

However, if indeed there was an issue, we did the right thing.

1 hour ago, stevethemanjordan said:

 

No, she's also from Melbourne and is part of the reason he is weighing up a move back south.

 

 

The reverse of the Gibbs situation. That could help. Goose/gander.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons head to the Red Centre to face St Kilda in Alice Springs, aiming for a third straight win to keep their push for a Top 8 spot alive. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
      • Clap
      • Like
    • 466 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 12

    Round 12 kicks off with the Brisbane hosting Essendon at the Gabba as the Lions aim to solidify their top-two position against an injury-hit Bombers side seeking to maintain momentum after a win over Richmond. On Friday night it's a blockbuster at the G as the Magpies look to extend their top of the table winning streak while the Hawks strive to bounce back from a couple of recent defeats and stay in contention for the Top 4. On Saturday the Suns, buoyed by 3 wins on the trot, face the Dockers in a clash crucial for both teams' aspirations this season. The Suns want to solidify their Top 4 standing whilst the Dockers will be desperate to break into the 8.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 236 replies
  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    The media has performed a complete reversal in its coverage of the Melbourne Football Club over the past month and a half. Having endured intense criticism from all quarters in the press, which continually identified new avenues for scrutiny of every aspect, both on and off the field, and prematurely speculated about the departures of coaches, players, officials, and various employees from a club that lost its first five matches and appeared out of finals contention, the narrative has suddenly shifted to one of unbridled optimism.  The Demons have won five of their last six matches, positioning themselves just one game (and a considerable amount of percentage) outside the top eight at the halfway mark of the season. They still trail the primary contenders and remain far from assured of a finals berth.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 12 replies
  • REPORT: Sydney

    A few weeks ago, I visited a fellow Melbourne Football Club supporter in hospital, and our conversation inevitably shifted from his health diagnosis to the well-being of our football team. Like him, Melbourne had faced challenges in recent months, but an intervention - in his case, surgery, and in the team's case, a change in game style - had brought about much improvement.  The team's professionals had altered its game style from a pedestrian and slow-moving approach, which yielded an average of merely 60 points for five winless games, to a faster and more direct style. This shift led to three consecutive wins and a strong competitive effort in the fourth game, albeit with a tired finish against Hawthorn, a strong premiership contender.  As we discussed our team's recent health improvement, I shared my observations on the changes within the team, including the refreshed style, the introduction of new young talent, such as rising stars Caleb Windsor, Harvey Langford, and Xavier Lindsay, and the rebranding of Kozzy Pickett from a small forward to a midfield machine who can still get among the goals. I also highlighted the dominance of captain Max Gawn in the ruck and the resurgence in form in a big way of midfield superstars Christian Petracca and Clayton Oliver. 

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 9 replies
  • PODCAST: Sydney

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 26th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse a crushing victory by the Demons over the Swans at the G. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.

      • Haha
    • 51 replies
  • POSTGAME: Sydney

    The Demons controlled the contest from the outset, though inaccurate kicking kept the Swans in the game until half time. But after the break, Melbourne put on the jets and blew Sydney away and the demolition job was complete.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 428 replies