3 hours ago, Jaded said:

Look for someone else to kick a bag instead #melbournelyf

But he'll be playing against our 2's this week - presumably minus Dunny. Prefer he wait a week for other VFL sides to show how good he is against second rate defences 

1 hour ago, dworship said:

Is there a way to put you on ignore permanently?

I agree with PF . No infallible track record here and I have already presumed the post match presser should we come a cropper.

Dropping Jeffy whilst seemingly justified is  daft, especially when no  across the board consistency exists.

Edited June 9, 20169 yr by beelzebub

Jeffy would have caused headaches for Collingwood. His game last week was poor, but his overall 2016 has been solid. Shattered he isn't playing.

I think its a good move (Dropping Jeffy).

Shows him that he needs to maintain his high standards to hold his place. 

I'll be very happy with selections if Grimes gets a run.

I wouldn't mind Grimes' experience in the backline this week, considering how garbage Collingwood's forward line is.

Ins. Kennedy Grimes

Outs. Harmes Garlett

Jetta T.Mcd o.mcd

Wagner Frost Grimes

Vince Trengove Stretch

Kent Dawes Petraccccccccca

Kennedy Hogan Watts

Gawn Tyson N.Jones

Oliver Hunt Vandenburg Bugg

3 hours ago, daisycutter said:

and next week when they drop them, they will be wittless and coxless  which will restore reality to colonwood

Damn! Wish I had said that...... Do they have a 'Ball' playing for them?

4 hours ago, picket fence said:

No way known would I have dropped Jeffy... Brave move Roosy, you obviously have got selection right all year!!!!!!!!!

Ohh wait a minute!????

 

Garlett didnt even try last week,  We may have won if we had someone else in his role that gave a toss.

Edited June 9, 20169 yr by Petraccattack

6 hours ago, Petraccattack said:

Garlett didnt even try last week,  We may have won if we had someone else in his role that gave a toss.

'Tracca' this is a silly call by you. Regardless if we had Kennedy or even a Grimes playing his spot we still would have lost. 

Having watched the replay we had far bigger issues then Garlett.

On 6/10/2016 at 0:43 AM, Petraccattack said:

Garlett didnt even try last week,  We may have won if we had someone else in his role that gave a toss.

He played poorly but you cant accuse him of not trying. That's really poor of you.

Harmes was outstanding the last time we played them.

Wouldn't be surprised if we gets yet another life.

Grimes playing at Casey again, unfair and dissapointing, he's been playing well enough to get shot at firsts. Obviously Roos and Goodwin don't rate him and will be traded at end of year

Edited June 11, 20169 yr by dave

On 10/06/2016 at 0:43 AM, Petraccattack said:

Garlett didnt even try last week,  We may have won if we had someone else in his role that gave a toss.

Rubbish call. He had a poor game, but he ran all day and gave more second efforts than golden boy Hogan.

Open your eyes. Yes, both of them.

 

4 hours ago, dave said:

Grimes playing at Casey again, unfair and dissapointing, he's been playing well enough to get shot at firsts. Obviously Roos and Goodwin don't rate him and will be traded at end of year

won't be traded because he'll walk as a free agent.

 

i'm just not sure whether he's that desirable for any club,

Jack Viney is an animal, or stupid, or both... or he won't actually play.

 

May be heresy here but I hope Viney doesn't play on Monday. He's too valuable an asset to put in the team if there's the slightest doubt about the state of the hand. If he does more damage this week then Allah help us !!!!

5 hours ago, dave said:

Grimes playing at Casey again, unfair and dissapointing, he's been playing well enough to get shot at firsts. Obviously Roos and Goodwin don't rate him and will be traded at end of year

Who does he replace?