Jump to content

Featured Replies

54 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

Exactly my point.  I did know that, my post was aiming for the facetious.  Them bleating about how unfair the advantage Victorian clubs get over interstate clubs is ridiculous when they can't see past their own noses.  That's why I'm still incredibly angry about the whole Mac Andrew farce.

If we matched the Gold Coast bid on Andrew, that would have likely came at pick 5, we would have had nothing left to pay for JVR.

I don't think we got hurt with that rule change, unless you think Mac Andrew has way more upside than JVR.

 
11 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Northern state academies are open to anyone not based on ethnicity like NGA.

which is why gold coast got about 5 first rounders last year and will get 5 more next year. utterly ridiculous situation as all the elite juniors are invited then are tied to one club. 

10 minutes ago, Bay Riffin said:

which is why gold coast got about 5 first rounders last year and will get 5 more next year. utterly ridiculous situation as all the elite juniors are invited then are tied to one club. 

exactly!

 
1 hour ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Have been reading through a GC Suns Forum and it's interesting to read that KW is not rated particularly highly at all by those who follow the junior teams up there.  Most attributing his selections to name, height and 'favours'.

If these reports are anything to go by, there are much more promising prospects for the Suns to choose from in their academy next year.

 

The suns have fans with a forum?!? Who knew


13 hours ago, manny100 said:

According to the HUN he is now 204cms and will train with us and GC.

His grandfather rates him better than Jeff.

Lazy journalism.

Jeff said he is now 6'7''.  Sam Edmund's incorrect conversion of that was 204cm.

6'7'' is actually 200.66cm.

My gut feel is that he's 199/200cm, which allows for slight embellishment from a proud Father.

Jeff is a very proud father, but does an awful lot of promoting of this son, which Kalani, at his age, may well find a bit cringeworthy. If so, maybe Kalani would like to escape the clutches of his old man, which would be good for our chances of him nominating us. 

 
45 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

Jeff is a very proud father, but does an awful lot of promoting of this son, which Kalani, at his age, may well find a bit cringeworthy. If so, maybe Kalani would like to escape the clutches of his old man, which would be good for our chances of him nominating us. 

Myself and @Adam The God have been big on this for a while.

There's being a proud father, and then there's being obsessive to the point of it being unhealthy. 

If Kalani turns down MFC, I don't know who'll be more distraught, the MFC fans, or his player manager Jeff White.


On 12/11/2024 at 15:55, Ted Lasso said:

I think the pitch is pretty simple, he's much MUCH more likely to get a game consistently with us than he is to displace Walter, King or Andrew out of the forward line at the Suns. 

Bring him down to the G for Anzac Eve and Kings Birthday, big crowds marquee games which you won’t get at Metricon

1 hour ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Bring him down to the G for Anzac Eve and Kings Birthday, big crowds marquee games which you won’t get at Metricon

Except Kalani might just love the family life, his mates and the GC sunshine.  it’s a tough deal to beat!! 
 

Really hoping the Dees impress him during the pre Xmas trading.  Maybe he can sign up to board with the Brayshaws!!! .  

8 hours ago, rumpole said:

Yes but you need to take into account the family situation with Kalani’s mother and brothers still living on the Gold Coast and perhaps not so inclined to move down to Melbourne.

What about a fortnightly gig as a part time specialist ruck coach?

Could also check in on Kalani to see how he is going.

Could also do forward scouting game reports on Lions and Suns and some part time recruiting for us as well.

Where there is a will there is a way.

Edited by Redleg

I could get a few 'face palm' emoji reactions (but they no longer exist 🙃) for this somewhat sacrilegious question:  do folks want him for the sentimentality of F/S or because he will be very good? 

1 minute ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I could get a few 'face palm' emoji reactions (but they no longer exist 🙃) for this somewhat sacrilegious question:  do folks want him for the sentimentality of F/S or because he will be very good? 

He is definitely good enough to be drafted based on underage form for a key tall.

Whether he ends up a first round pick will depend on his form next year. Often key talls don't really come into top contention until the year of their draft.


26 minutes ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I could get a few 'face palm' emoji reactions (but they no longer exist 🙃) for this somewhat sacrilegious question:  do folks want him for the sentimentality of F/S or because he will be very good? 

He's got the talent LH. My issue though is that he's been used used in the wrong position as a defender. That's not his niche.

In my opinion he's a genuine Forward/ruckman similar to Sam Darcy from the Western Bulldogs. I want to see more of him as a forward next year then a defender.

Either way, his talent and athletic profile is certainly a good fit for us from a list profile and needs perspective. 

I don't quite see the traits that they obviously see if playing Kalani down back.

The next 6 months will be interesting for him. 

3 minutes ago, layzie said:

I don't quite see the traits that they obviously see if playing Kalani down back.

The next 6 months will be interesting for him. 

I’m hoping it was more a learning type of thing. Understand what the best young forwards are doing and then play 2025 as a key forward/ruck.

1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I could get a few 'face palm' emoji reactions (but they no longer exist 🙃) for this somewhat sacrilegious question:  do folks want him for the sentimentality of F/S or because he will be very good? 

If you think you'd get facepalms then I'm about to go nuclear...

I don't want a team full of Father sons, I feel that so many posters on here want to have as many F/S as possible but it doesn't float my boat, actually it grosses me out if I'm being honest. If a F/S prospect is damn good or has potential to grow into something amazing then absolutely go for it. Of course I have no issue with a slight leg up (like Kobe Farmer training with us a few years back) either.

But having over around 8 on the list seems like nepotism city to me and I don't see the romance that others do in it. Best player for the spot, not hard. 

1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

I could get a few 'face palm' emoji reactions (but they no longer exist 🙃) for this somewhat sacrilegious question:  do folks want him for the sentimentality of F/S or because he will be very good? 

I personally wouldn’t want any F/S who is not good and either would the club.

The anxiety here is we have followed him for a few years as a future F/S and he is doing well. However ,now we have opposition for his services and if we lose out again to GC because of changed rules and he becomes a good player it will be very annoying.


7 hours ago, tilly18 said:

If we matched the Gold Coast bid on Andrew, that would have likely came at pick 5, we would have had nothing left to pay for JVR.

I don't think we got hurt with that rule change, unless you think Mac Andrew has way more upside than JVR.

Irrelevant. If Mac was our first pick we would  have made the points somehow even if we wanted JVR. You have to look at it that we would like both not just be satisfied with one star. 

Clubs are doing their homework if they want the best. 

24 minutes ago, layzie said:

I don't quite see the traits that they obviously see if playing Kalani down back.

The next 6 months will be interesting for him. 

How many games have you seen him play Layzie?

13 minutes ago, 58er said:

Irrelevant. If Mac was our first pick we would  have made the points somehow even if we wanted JVR. You have to look at it that we would like both not just be satisfied with one star. 

Clubs are doing their homework if they want the best. 

if mac had been available to us via nga we would have traded out of the pick that became jvr

Edited by whatwhat say what

 
32 minutes ago, layzie said:

If you think you'd get facepalms then I'm about to go nuclear...

I don't want a team full of Father sons, I feel that so many posters on here want to have as many F/S as possible but it doesn't float my boat, actually it grosses me out if I'm being honest. If a F/S prospect is damn good or has potential to grow into something amazing then absolutely go for it. Of course I have no issue with a slight leg up (like Kobe Farmer training with us a few years back) either.

But having over around 8 on the list seems like nepotism city to me and I don't see the romance that others do in it. Best player for the spot, not hard. 

8?! Viney, Woewodin and Brown are on the 2025 list. Who else am I missing?

4 minutes ago, Dee Boys said:

8?! Viney, Woewodin and Brown are on the 2025 list. Who else am I missing?

Must think Trent is Jared’s son…


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 423 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies