Thank god for Titus

As well as that ManDee and OD, you also have to wonder if so much of the infantile denial is because a good number of the 750 other players may not be all that innocent or even now if they are or not.

1 hour ago, ManDee said:

Where do they get these imbeciles?

One after another goes off half cocked, espousing their fantasy worlds, I suspect very few have read all the available documentation.

Margaret Wenham " The CAS finding also arose from it accepting WADA’s evidentiary “cable”, with that cable comprising “strands” of evidence. But, as far as I can see, there is no irrefutable proof TB-4 was given to the players and no evidence the players thought or knew they may have been supplied with it".

How does she reconcile the fact that on many occasions the 34 lied to ASADA investigators saying that they took no supplements? There were thousands of injections and not one player thought to mention it!

Many sportsmen have been banned on intent. You don't need a positive test Margaret. The players new what they were doing was risky, that is why they lied. Are there any real journalists out there? 

I am sick to death of the fan boys/girls.

 

so "comfortable satisfaction" now has to be "irrefutable proof". just where do these journos get their basic legal skills from? reading bomberbliz probably.

Je pris peptides

23 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

. just where do these journos get their basic legal skills from? reading bomberbliz probably.

I think a more important question is where do these journo's get their basic journalistic skills from ?

33 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

so "comfortable satisfaction" now has to be "irrefutable proof". just where do these journos get their basic legal skills from? reading bomberbliz probably.

Probably a mix of bomber blitz and the talking donkey!

9 minutes ago, nutbean said:

Je pris peptides

I think a more important question is where do these journo's get their basic journalistic skills from ?

I suspect that a large number have never done journalistic training nutbean.

I think are large number are sports people who started writing articles after they finished playing their respective sports.

 

21 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Although I assume that Essendon FC can't pay for Mick or any other coach, fitness or otherwise. Perhaps a sponsor could. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

Or some millionaire ex president with a Little spare ca$h?

12 minutes ago, nutbean said:

Je pris peptides

I think a more important question is where do these journo's get their basic journalistic skills from ?

YouTube or is that Facebook! 

4 hours ago, nutbean said:

Je pris peptides

I think a more important question is where do these journo's get their basic journalistic skills from ?

Rice bubbles packet.

Law degrees come randomly in pop tart packets. 

4 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Rice bubbles packet.

Law degrees come randomly in pop tart packets. 

Where do arts degrees come from then, I thought they had the rice bubbles market tied down?

6 minutes ago, Chris said:

Where do arts degrees come from then, I thought they had the rice bubbles market tied down?

You know when you buy a coffee and you sometimes get a card that gets stamped, 10th coffee free dealeo? You can either take the free coffee or Arts degree.

Just now, Ethan Tremblay said:

You know when you buy a coffee and you sometimes get a card that gets stamped, 10th coffee free dealeo? You can either take the free coffee or Arts degree.

So an arts law degree comes in your tenth pack of pop tarts then? Sounds about right.

17 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

Id be fascinated to hear. My info on the matter is really only from 2 sources. The  press ( which is not really information) and this forum. So a glimpse into other worlds would be appreciated.

 

Well, to expand a litle.  One ,...a brother in law ( actually both are ..lol )  teh non past AFL player but ardent  Collingwood supporter  seem to reflect the Essendon logic . Couldnt get his head around the idea of how WADA could go to CAS with  a case de novo. He struggled even as to why the 34 would go to the Swiss tribunal  , why not appeal to the high court here. I tried to explain the jurisdiction angle.. but he wasnt hearing it lol ( he is a bit deaf as well...lol )  Thought it silly we were even under the code.. "it's footy !! "

The other b-i-l ...ex player was strangley more open to my explanations.   As I unraveled the mess for him he came to see what the fuss really was about but was curious why the AFL  bought into the code. I explained the government money  etc would dry up overnight if they didnt and it would be far harder for Footy to compete agaisnt other codes if they were ostracised from Government endorsed policies/grants/help etc.

 

All in all one was educated by the discussion  the other wouldnt here of it. Both epitomised  the typical punter. i.e   didnt really know much of the ins and outs....just what the papers said !!!

 

they asked how I knew so much...I said ..I dont believe papers !!   I investigate

YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE NEWSPAPERS!!!

 

 

Dank and Dark

dank

daŋk/

adjective

adjective: dank; comparative adjective: danker; superlative adjective: dankest

 

1. unpleasantly damp and cold.

Stephen Dank suing for defamation over Jon Mannah newspaper articles

48 minutes ago, sue said:

Dank and Dark

dank

daŋk/

adjective

adjective: dank; comparative adjective: danker; superlative adjective: dankest

 

1. unpleasantly damp and cold.

Stephen Dank suing for defamation over Jon Mannah newspaper articles

wonder if he has any records

49 minutes ago, sue said:

Dank and Dark

dank

daŋk/

adjective

adjective: dank; comparative adjective: danker; superlative adjective: dankest

 

1. unpleasantly damp and cold.

Stephen Dank suing for defamation over Jon Mannah newspaper articles

Hahhaa

"He told the court: "Mr Dank comes before you as a man of excellent reputation, which we say has been ruined by the defendant including the editors and the journalists."

40 minutes ago, Cards13 said:

Hahhaa

"He told the court: "Mr Dank comes before you as a man of excellent reputation, which we say has been ruined by the defendant including the editors and the journalists."

There are two Stephen Danks?

 

Must be confusion with Stephen Danks. A real artist who paints bombers. Not to be confused with the bull artist who jabs bombers.

http://www.stephendanks.com

Edited February 15, 20169 yr by america de cali

1 hour ago, Cards13 said:

Hahhaa

"He told the court: "Mr Dank comes before you as a man of excellent reputation, which we say has been ruined by the defendant including the editors and the journalists."

QUOTE:

Mr Dank's standing in the community will be a central issue in this trial.

As Mr Evatt said: "We are not born with a reputation", instead it was earned as we aged.

A reputation he explained was "what people say about us behind our back".

 

Nothing more need be said - this says it all. 

11 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Extract: 

Is the case really going to be conducted in French?

Oui. Yes. We're waiting for official confirmation of procedures from the Swiss court, but from what we've been told all the documentation so far has had to be translated into French.

CAS is based in Lausanne, i.e., French-speaking, so you would imagine in French.

12 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

There are two Stephen Danks?

OMG he has been cloned!

15 minutes ago, DemonFrog said:

OMG he has been cloned!

Yes, an unfortunate outcome of pharmaceutical experiments that went awry to clone Jobe Watson.

These guys look really fit and would be perfect cultural fit for the Drug Lords as top up players.

So no need for the Swiss Trip.

Apparently a 'mystery benefactor' paid his $750,000 legal bill to ASADA:

 Mystery benefactor paid off James Hird's $750,000 legal debt