AFL Round 12 - Non MFC Games

[titan_uranus 25,043]

It's always a sad moment when Carlton win....

Take solace in the fact that they need the best draft picks they can get, so wins like this, which feel good at the time, might come back to bite them if they end up finishing above a few other teams.

[Sir Why You Little 37,130]

Take solace in the fact that they need the best draft picks they can get, so wins like this, which feel good at the time, might come back to bite them if they end up finishing above a few other teams.

fair call. But i hate seeing them win anything!!

[SaberFang 7,151]

Surely I'm not the only neutral who raised his eyebrows at some of that umpiring. 24-10 and 6 in a row to Carlton in the dying minutes, most of them highly dubious and all conveniently inside or near Port's F50.

Hard not to be sceptical. Doesn't change the fact that Port stunk, but the umps blatantly got Carlton over the line by consistently interfering with every Port effort inside 50.

Calling out Boak for a throw in a game filled with throws that go unnoticed, for example.

[titan_uranus 25,043]

Surely I'm not the only neutral who raised his eyebrows at some of that umpiring. 24-10 and 6 in a row to Carlton in the dying minutes, most of them highly dubious and all conveniently inside or near Port's F50.

Hard not to be sceptical. Doesn't change the fact that Port stunk, but the umps blatantly got Carlton over the line by consistently interfering with every Port effort inside 50.

Calling out Boak for a throw in a game filled with throws that go unnoticed, for example.

I've never seen an umpire pay a mark but another umpire over-rule him to the point where they take the ball and bounce it, either.

[SaberFang 7,151]

I've never seen an umpire pay a mark but another umpire over-rule him to the point where they take the ball and bounce it, either.

Especially when even the replay isn't conclusive. That stunk to the high heavens, especially when it prevented a set shot at goal for Port.

[old dee 23,872]

Blues will finish in front of us come the end of August.

Simple reason they do have the injury list that we have.

It is now looking very obvious that they are playing for Barker.

I think Mick Had the same problem as Neeld.

The players just did not believe.

[John Crow Batty 8,879]

Take solace in the fact that they need the best draft picks they can get, so wins like this, which feel good at the time, might come back to bite them if they end up finishing above a few other teams.

I think they will be over the draft treadmill like us. What they showed today and post Malthouse is a better barometer for their future.

Edited June 20, 2015 by america de cali

[titan_uranus 25,043]

Especially when even the replay isn't conclusive. That stunk to the high heavens, especially when it prevented a set shot at goal for Port.

If the controlling umpire didn't pay it a touch as soon as it happened then it shouldn't have been changed. Otherwise ether the non-controlling umpire has run in from the distance (and cannot have seen it conclusively), or the controlling umpire has changed his mind. Either of those options is wrong and could have cost Port the game (not that they deserved it, but still).

If the controlling umpire called it though, then so be it.

As much as the umpiring went against them today, Port's bigger problems are their own making.

[What 18,810]

Carlton beat Port? Wow

Sudden;y we are a fair chance at the wooden spoon. Depressing.

[Ted Lasso 19,549]

The loss of mumford and its result really highlights how desperately we need someone like that

[titan_uranus 25,043]

The loss of mumford and its result really highlights how desperately we need someone like that

Really? You want us to be like GC and GWS (if they do become impotent without Mumford) and be wholly reliant on one player?

I'd much rather us develop a team that can play week in week out, even with injuries (a la Hawthorn).

[Straight Sets Simon 23,113]

Cripps will be a star, he's probably the pick of the 2013 draft so far, even ahead of Bontempelli.

[Wadda We Sing 10,685]

If the controlling umpire didn't pay it a touch as soon as it happened then it shouldn't have been changed. Otherwise ether the non-controlling umpire has run in from the distance (and cannot have seen it conclusively), or the controlling umpire has changed his mind. Either of those options is wrong and could have cost Port the game (not that they deserved it, but still).

If the controlling umpire called it though, then so be it.

As much as the umpiring went against them today, Port's bigger problems are their own making.

Looks like the Carlton player waving his arms talked the ump into changing the decision. The Port player had clean possession and should have been called to play on immediately. With the amount of time remaining it was clearly penalizing the attacking team..

[Earl Hood 6,101]

Re Carlton I am expecting Griggs to get 3 plus weeks for that sling tackle on Grey. It wasn't even a Trengove type sling it was much worse and the impact much worse. If that is not sited the AFL are a joke.

I am also calling that Mitchell should be sited for lifting his knee into Tex and taking him out. Reckless, high impact? Not sure on the rules but I remember doing it myself once to protect myself instinctively without thinking. i knew I was in the wrong and all hell broke loose when I took out the guy coming at me. It is one of those don't do's.

[Willmoy1947 4,140]

Must have been the same ratbags who tried to get Richmond over the line too..

[jackaub 1,402]

Take solace in the fact that they need the best draft picks they can get, so wins like this, which feel good at the time, might come back to bite them if they end up finishing above a few other teams.

Like above us??

[dees189227 12,398]

Geez it annoying watching Stef Martin an athletic ruckman run around at the lions. I get at the time at melbourne he may not have played this well but at the moment he'd be handy for us. We traded him for picks 52 (Matt Jones) & 71 (Daniel Nicholson). Was that trade under Neelds watch?

[What 18,810]

Geez it annoying watching Stef Martin an athletic ruckman run around at the lions. I get at the time at melbourne he may not have played this well but at the moment he'd be handy for us. We traded him for picks 52 (Matt Jones) & 71 (Daniel Nicholson). Was that trade under Neelds watch?

Only Melbourne would have a ruckman on the list for years, develop him and then trade him for peanuts right as hes reaches his prime years.

[Wiseblood 24,637]

Only Melbourne would have a ruckman on the list for years, develop him and then trade him for peanuts right as hes reaches his prime years.

And only Melbourne supporters would bring it up every single week.

[SaberFang 7,151]

Not sure if anyone is watching the "blockbuster" tonight, but the Bulldogs are getting everything from the umps tonight. Feel horrible for the hapless Lions.

Boyd is miles off the pace right now. Has kicked 3 goals tonight; 2 were from laughably soft free kicks, the other from standing in the goal square while his teammate won the hardball for him. He also nearly botched it when he fumbled it with his hands a metre from goal.

Apparently he was disgusted at being subbed last week; he need only look in the mirror to see why.

[Little Richard 6,265]

Not sure if anyone is watching the "blockbuster" tonight, but the Bulldogs are getting everything from the umps tonight. Feel horrible for the hapless Lions.

Boyd is miles off the pace right now. Has kicked 3 goals tonight; 2 were from laughably soft free kicks, the other from standing in the goal square while his teammate won the hardball for him. He also nearly botched it when he fumbled it with his hands a metre from goal.

Apparently he was disgusted at being subbed last week; he need only look in the mirror to see why.

I think the Bulldogs have absolutely shafted themselves for the next 6 years with this Boyd deal. I don't think he'll be much more than a solid key forward and his paycheck is ridiculous.

[SaberFang 7,151]

I think the Bulldogs have absolutely shafted themselves for the next 6 years with this Boyd deal. I don't think he'll be much more than a solid key forward and his paycheck is ridiculous.

Still live in hope the Buddy deal backfires on Sydney, too. The Boyd deal makes that one look like a stroke of genius (which currently it appears to be -- we'll see where Buddy's at in 7 years and get a clearer idea).

Edited June 20, 2015 by Lamashtu

[DemonOX 8,800]

Commentators salivating over NicNat. Sure, he hit about a dozen to advantage and was gifted 2 goals by the umps, but similarly, he took ZERO marks and had 12 disposals. Hmmmm........

If that was Watts he would have been strung up and hung out to dry.

It's pathetic some r a protected species.

[M C 221]

If that was Watts he would have been strung up and hung out to dry.

It's pathetic some r a protected species.

Did you watch the game?

Nic Nat was massive for West Coast last night

[monoccular 17,573]

The incredible fall from grace by Port this year could perhaps raise questions as to whether there was perhaps "something unusual" they had been taking last year??