The new Prince of Geelong.

Fortunately, the Prince we effectively swapped him for is in much better nick.

Was it, have a look at the last post on The Diet thread. Bout three hours before you started this thread

haven't seen it. So was it an original thought? Yes.

Carry on peasant.

Definitely not photoshopped

Yes it is.

Yes it is.

Now I look at it closely - it actually does look photoshopped.

Now I look at it closely - it actually does look photoshopped.

Have seen him recently, isn't fat.

why are we still talking about this rich deserter?

why are we still talking about this rich deserter?

f i i k !!!

f i i k !!!

I think I agree but I cannot work out f i i k

The arms, the light, the hang of the clothes, particularly where the arm and shirt meet - this photoshopper is a genius.

Edited December 1, 201411 yr by Elusive Tunbridge

fiik either, od

I think I agree but I cannot work out f i i k

last 3 words as If I Know !! sure you can work out the first !! lol

The arms, the light, the hang of the clothes, particularly where the arm and shirt meet - this photoshopper is a genius.

my thoughts too...if shopped...thats very VERY well done ( could be..as you say genius talent )

why are we still talking about this rich deserter?

f i i k !!!

I think I agree but I cannot work out f i i k

fiik either, od

How stuie can take or leave this I have no idea...

I take!

Yes it is.

Are you trying to say that a media organisation would deliberately photo shop a picture of Mitch Clark to make him appear fat after he's well known battle with depression?

Seriously

I'd say there is a good chance it is either photoshopped or a really really really bad angle.

Are you trying to say that a media organisation would deliberately photo shop a picture of Mitch Clark to make him appear fat after he's well known battle with depression?

Seriously

If your seriously stupid enough to believe thats actually him then your pretty gullible.

And y would be surprised what a media organisation would do to create a story.

last 3 words as If I Know !! sure you can work out the first !! lol

A bit slow this morning

But now I have it.

He's eaten Sam Blease!

Sam Blease doesnt get close enough to any team mates/opposition to even get close to being eaten!

I'd say there is a good chance it is either photoshopped or a really really really bad angle.

Still a turd

The arms, the light, the hang of the clothes, particularly where the arm and shirt meet - this photoshopper is a genius.

Certainly better that the EFC or HS dude that did the Thymomodulin bottle.

I'd say there is a good chance it is either photoshopped or a really really really bad angle.

ugh my eyes...

I'd say there is a good chance it is either photoshopped or a really really really bad angle.

How do we know these weren't photoshopped?

Now I look at it closely - it actually does look photoshopped.

The whole right side from his chest down to his waist has been painted in (and poorly at that). You can see where the "artist" (and I use that term very loosely) has painted rather clumsily over the folds running from the left to right on his shirt (from our point of view).

http://www.aflphotos.com.au/galleries/results/?q=collection:AFL%202014%20Training%20-%20Geelong%20Cats%20171114&image_id=353794

surely the official AFL photo would not have been shopped by the photographer - that makes no sense. Interestingly, the photo in question is not shown in this collection - so where is it?

My guess is the photo is real, just extrememly badly timed with unflattering angle.