Players to target at the end of the year

[Moneider96 1,045]

Had a quick look at the GWS bigfooty forum. Apparantly the 'kid' who wrote the article got it wrong according to Emma Quayle

[Moneider96 1,045]

Who is a pretty credible source...well relative to the person who wrote the initial article about Shiel staying at GWS

Edited August 11, 2014 by Moneider96

[dee-luded 2,959]

Dw guys Shiel is still a possibility. Apparently the article about him resigning with GWS is [censored].

you have these abbreviations ??? WTF... dw?

somebody speak english just for once please. everyone is using tooooo many abreviations.

[Moneider96 1,045]

We have no chance of getting Petracca now in my opinion because Saints or GWS will take him. So I expect us to have a real go at Shiel

[dee-luded 2,959]

We have no chance of getting Petracca now in my opinion because Saints or GWS will take him. So I expect us to have a real go at Shiel

hopefully not just, Shiel to. we need a couple.

[Moneider96 1,045]

Ohh... Get off your high horse mate. It's the Internet..people can't be fuked typing full words. Oh btw dw means don't worry. And ye I agree with your second comment

Edited August 11, 2014 by Moneider96

[dee-luded 2,959]

Ohh... Get off your high horse mate. It's the Internet..people can't be fuked typing full words. Oh btw dw means don't worry. And ye I agree with your second comment

well, for someone too fukin lazy to type full words you just did. if i'm on a high horse, then you must be on a rocker. & cut the crap. just write what it means & be done with it.

[Moneider96 1,045]

Oh please mate...I came to this forum to talk footy not other [censored]. Can you please just chill out instead of constantly having a go at me? It would be much appreciated

Edited August 11, 2014 by Moneider96

[SaberFang 7,151]

The way GWS are hoarding young players does my head in. Do they really need Petracca when they already have Shiel? They just seem to be soaking up every top-end talent in the draft year after year, but they're not actually making any progress as a team.

Really gotta wonder what their strategy is up in the Wastelands. I'm assuming they'll just hold players hostage until other teams pay overs in trades to poach their talent.

Edited August 11, 2014 by Lamashtu

[whatwhat say what 22,196]

The way GWS are hoarding young players does my head in. Do they really need Petracca when they already have Shiel? They just seem to be soaking up every top-end talent in the draft year after year, but they're not actually making any progress as a team.

Really gotta wonder what their strategy is up in the Wastelands. I'm assuming they'll just hold players hostage until other teams pay overs in trades to poach their talent.

Classified was interesting last night - they have significantly less support coaching staff with about 25 years less experience than compared to a hawthorn.

With all their kids they should have way, way more.

[Machsy 2,858]

Weren't Sydney picking up that bargain first rounder via their academy? Wouldn't trading them our top 3 pick ruin their bidding system for him?

Nope.

Bidding is before the trade period.

Picks are already tied to F/S or academy players before any extra picks can go in or out.

[Machsy 2,858]

Oh please mate...I came to this forum to talk footy not other [censored]. Can you please just chill out instead of constantly having a go at me? It would be much appreciated

You come to talk footy in obscure code, it would seem...

[Machsy 2,858]

Did a bit of digging on the Cats former Liston medallist and why he's out of favour.

Apparently is a party boy, Moloney style.

Has bad breath, eats a lot of tic tacs.

Obscure enough for ya?

[Ted Lasso 18,786]

Dylan shiel is still a big possibility to leave the giants, he is attracting alot of interest but we have the best cap room and pick to offer to trade

Not huge on Sam reid, would rather tommlinson

[Moneider96 1,045]

'I come to talk footy in obscure code'

I'm assuming that your implying I don't express myself clearly? Yet you just said 'talk footy in obscure code'? Alright mate...whatever floats your boat.

Edited August 12, 2014 by Moneider96

[Ethan Tremblay 30,033]

'I come to talk footy in obscure code'

I'm assuming that your implying I don't express myself clearly? Yet you just said 'talk footy in obscure code'? Alright mate...whatever floats your boat.

Mon I think "dw" actually stands for "dee-luded [censored]"

Some people really need to chill the [censored] out and not stress the small stuff.

Makes them come across as real dw's.

Edited August 12, 2014 by Ethan Tremblay

[rjay 24,615]

'I come to talk footy in obscure code'

I'm assuming that your implying I don't express myself clearly? Yet you just said 'talk footy in obscure code'? Alright mate...whatever floats your boat.

Keep using your code mate, I might have to ask what it means from time to time though. Hope you don't mind.

[Moneider96 1,045]

Lol ok

[Pennant St Dee 12,700]

Pick 2 and 3 / 3 and 4 would not affect Sydney's ability to draft Isaac Heeney at all. Academy bidding, like father-son, is done compared to actual draft selection, and conducted prior to trade period.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/2014-07-17/key-trade-draft-and-free-agency-dates

Would be very happy to get Reid, but would definitely want something else.

Reid and Malceski for pick 3 or 4 would be worth considering.

Wouldn't give up that pick to get Reid & Malceski, Reid & Mitchell yes but not for someone who is getting on and can also be attained via delisted free agent or through PSD with a front end loaded contract given our cap room

[rjay 24,615]

Wouldn't give up that pick to get Reid & Malceski, Reid & Mitchell yes but not for someone who is getting on and can also be attained via delisted free agent or through PSD with a front end loaded contract given our cap room

Agree with you on this, it's way overs for Malceski at his age.

[Born to Run 204]

Reid and Mitchell for #3 or #4 and whatever is not used (#3 or #4) for Shiel.

Do that and I would be bloody happy!

[Wunders 395]

Wouldn't give up that pick to get Reid & Malceski, Reid & Mitchell yes but not for someone who is getting on and can also be attained via delisted free agent or through PSD with a front end loaded contract given our cap room

Why not go for all three. Isn't that what roos tries to do use one pick to get two players.. so why not 2 picks for three.

Ried, Mitchell & Malceski for picks 3+4.

That would be worthwhile (funny thing is i see the biggest/best impact coming from Malceski).

[Moneider96 1,045]

Because we want Shiel!!

[Moneider96 1,045]

Plus pick 3 and 4 is overs IMO

[Ted Lasso 18,786]

3/4 for Shiel and Boyd who is believed to be extremely unhappy at the Giants