pitchfork 181 Posted April 6, 2014 Posted April 6, 2014 This is as faithfully quoted as possible, on the run: Neil cordy writes in the HUN ...After just two games, its clear to see why the Giants last week extended his (Kelly) contract to 2017. It is also clear to question why Melbourne gave away its rights to Kelly in pre-draft dealings last season, in exchanging picks No.2 and 20 for pick no 9 and Dom Tyson... Tyson, 20, has been one of the Dees best players so far this season and was their leading ball winner yesterday... But Kelly, 19, has shown signs of greatness in his two games as sub. As noted, Tyson had 25 possessions, 10 clearances.This was 6 more clearances than any other Melbourne player. Only Treloar and Cognilio had more and they were roving to Mumford who was outstanding. Neil Cordys best: M Jones, Howe, Frawley, Watts, Jones. It's easy to pile on the unsuccessful club, but this is just a nonsense. Tyson not included in the best either demonstrates a failure to understand the game, or an attempt to colour a pretty poorly thought out article.
jazza 1,323 Posted April 6, 2014 Posted April 6, 2014 This is as faithfully quoted as possible, on the run: As noted, Tyson had 25 possessions, 10 clearances. This was 6 more clearances than any other Melbourne player. Only Treloar and Cognilio had more and they were roving to Mumford who was outstanding. i would suggest tyson was also roving to mummy.
La Dee-vina Comedia 17,136 Posted April 6, 2014 Posted April 6, 2014 Gee. Making rash statements about drafting and trading after three games. His skills are wasted. He should be posting on Demonland.
DemonFrog 1,359 Posted April 6, 2014 Posted April 6, 2014 This is as faithfully quoted as possible, on the run: As noted, Tyson had 25 possessions, 10 clearances. This was 6 more clearances than any other Melbourne player. Only Treloar and Cognilio had more and they were roving to Mumford who was outstanding. Neil Cordy’s best: M Jones, Howe, Frawley, Watts, Jones. It's easy to pile on the unsuccessful club, but this is just a nonsense. Tyson not included in the best either demonstrates a failure to understand the game, or an attempt to colour a pretty poorly thought out article. Its easy to do as we have the worst team in the league.
The Song Formerly Known As 6,479 Posted April 6, 2014 Posted April 6, 2014 Listening to Finey on SEN last night and he spoke about how he was lucky enough to go to a few Grammar games last season, and witnessed Kelly absolutely tearing the games apart. Said the kids an absolute freak and there was only one other player playing who was on par with him, who also shred the games and opposition he saw to pieces. That player was Christian Salem. So i recon pick 2 and 20, for Tyson and Salem is a bloody beauty.
Ted Lasso 19,586 Posted April 6, 2014 Posted April 6, 2014 we knew Kelly was going to be a gun, this really shouldn't come as a surprise Tyson has shown enough that in combination with my opinion of Salem i am still very comfortable with the decision we made
Whispering_Jack 31,365 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Neil Cordy wrote that? Well, it might be a good example of poor writing but he's still a better journo than he was a footballer.
Brayshaw Self 847 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Listening to Finey on SEN last night and he spoke about how he was lucky enough to go to a few Grammar games last season, and witnessed Kelly absolutely tearing the games apart. Said the kids an absolute freak and there was only one other player playing who was on par with him, who also shred the games and opposition he saw to pieces. That player was Christian Salem. So i recon pick 2 and 20, for Tyson and Salem is a bloody beauty. He has also said Jayden Hunt could be better than both
The Song Formerly Known As 6,479 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 He has also said Jayden Hunt could be better than both no he didn't, what he actually was he was a steal by us, as when Shawy invited him down to watch one time, Hunt played a better game than those 2. So based on that he may be better someday. Which really isn't such a bad thing for us is it? Geeze with your ability to create "facts from fiction" you could get a job at the HUN.
Brayshaw Self 847 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 no he didn't, what he actually was he was a steal by us, as when Shawy invited him down to watch one time, Hunt played a better game than those 2. So based on that he may be better someday. Which really isn't such a bad thing for us is it? Geeze with your ability to create "facts from fiction" you could get a job at the HUN. No, i said he HAS said it. He said it a couple of times in the week after the draft and that he umpired a couple of his games I think.
P-man 13,367 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Those BOGs say to me he either didn't watch the game or has absolutely NFI.
gsmith12 491 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 I rarely read the Hun and this article emphasises why. Just poor journalism.
Pates 9,697 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Tyson keeps me wanting to go to the football, there's still plenty of improvement for him but he's shown himself to be a very worthy pick up and a value trade with Salem still to come. People will be crying for Roos to play Salem but I think Roos will stay the course and let him develop with less pressure.
Sir Why You Little 37,450 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 I have no problem with Tyson He's a goer.
Arrow 1,257 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Matt Jones as our best player was probably the best indicator that he bases his post-game write-ups on stats not vision. Journalism is a sorry industry these days. They wonder why we don't pay for the paper anymore...
stranga 328 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Tyson is only solid becauase he had two years development at the Giants. If we took Kelly as a rookie he would not be playing the way he currently is. I'm happy with Dom and Salem.
P-man 13,367 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 The pundits can say what they want about Kelly. He'll most likely be a star, but early signs are that we got the Tyson/Salem deal right. A rare win.
Bring-Back-Powell 15,534 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Been happy with Tyson so far but how many times did he get pinged for holding the ball yesterday, trying to do too much. Should've been listed in our best.
45HG 1,559 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Been happy with Tyson so far but how many times did he get pinged for holding the ball yesterday, trying to do too much. Should've been listed in our best. It would've been a great deal less amount of times if he had some mates going with him, knowing where to run and backing themselves and their teammate to break a line. Watching the top teams it only highlights how important it is to know your role intimately, back your team mates and always be on the move. We have so far to go, I don't hope Tyson changes that part of his game - I hope his teammates change theirs!
Sir Why You Little 37,450 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 It would've been a great deal less amount of times if he had some mates going with him, knowing where to run and backing themselves and their teammate to break a line. Watching the top teams it only highlights how important it is to know your role intimately, back your team mates and always be on the move. We have so far to go, I don't hope Tyson changes that part of his game - I hope his teammates change theirs! Spot on 45. Our 5 year players refuse to learn anything.
Bedraggled Dee 336 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Tyson's stats are very good with the exception of tackles. He only had 1 and needs to stick a couple more. Tyson is head and shoulders above the majority of our midfield and one of our few quality players, I have never seen Salem other than a few training session preseason but he looks skillful and has some pace. I think potentially this was a very good deal for the Dees getting a ready to go potential A grader in Tyson and having Salem coming in to the side later this season or next year. I dont read the HUN or News.com because the reporting is rubbish and dont want to waste my eyes on it. Its not surprise the reporting is lazy, sessasionalist and without basis. They are a pack of flogs
The Song Formerly Known As 6,479 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 No, i said he HAS said it. He said it a couple of times in the week after the draft and that he umpired a couple of his games I think. i do apologise, i thought you were having a dig at me. It's very tense round these parts of late.
Whispering_Jack 31,365 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Matt Jones as our best player was probably the best indicator that he bases his post-game write-ups on stats not vision. Journalism is a sorry industry these days. They wonder why we don't pay for the paper anymore... Mixed him up with the Matt Jones who just won the Houston Open golf.
old dee 24,082 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 i do apologise, i thought you were having a dig at me. It's very tense round these parts of late. Actually TFSK I find it quite the reverse I have never known Demonland to be this quite and polite. Might be that now the vast majority have a similar view of our situation.
rjay 25,424 Posted April 7, 2014 Posted April 7, 2014 Tyson's stats are very good with the exception of tackles. He only had 1 and needs to stick a couple more. Tyson is head and shoulders above the majority of our midfield and one of our few quality players, I have never seen Salem other than a few training session preseason but he looks skillful and has some pace. I think potentially this was a very good deal for the Dees getting a ready to go potential A grader in Tyson and having Salem coming in to the side later this season or next year. I dont read the HUN or News.com because the reporting is rubbish and dont want to waste my eyes on it. Its not surprise the reporting is lazy, sessasionalist and without basis. They are a pack of flogs It's an area of his game he needs to work on, I'm sure the coach will be on top of this.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.