Jump to content

Malthouse adventure will end in tears

Featured Replies

Lucky I have an Optimism Regulator, which has just given me a warning shot of electricity.

So if you're not being optimistic, it shocks you? How ominous.
 

So if you're not being optimistic, it shocks you? How ominous.

No I think it gives him a nudge if he gets overly optimistic perhaps

Oh come on OD, it's not that bad. A few good draft picks and some good trades and we will be off and running. Add a hard pre season, a decent run with injuries and natural development of some of our younger players. I am going off to book my 2013 GF seats in anticipation.

Small joke there Redleg

Any how don't DEMONS come from HELL?

 

Oh come on OD, it's not that bad. A few good draft picks and some good trades and we will be off and running. Add a hard pre season, a decent run with injuries and natural development of some of our younger players. I am going off to book my 2013 GF seats in anticipation.

Looking forward to a Hawks and Swans replay?

There is a film in this one...

Or there will be after Micky M is the only one after Matthews, to win them a flag... e'D will go soon after it's realised he's shot himself in the feet.


Great move by Carlton. Malthouse is the best coach in the land. He took a struggling collingwood to 8 finals campaigns, 4 grand finals and 1 premiership, and left them stronger than ever. He developed a steely, uncompromising mindset that was rooted in philosophical ideology. His strategies were formulated from gladiatorial warfare. He is the master and I guess Carlton would have to be fools to pass him up.

It ponders the question. Why havnt we got him?

It ponders the question. Why havnt we got him?

Because he was coaching a side to a grand final when we were in the process of hiring Mark.

 

Why didn't we wait until malthouse was available so we could at least ask him.

Pretty sure if you had half a clue you could answer that question by yourself.


I think MM will do very well.

He aint finished yet.

I F$&@kin hate Carlscum but Mick is a cool dude.

Why didn't we wait until malthouse was available so we could at least ask him.

Dead set, are you 8 years old? There's a real world out there.

Why didn't we wait until malthouse was available so we could at least ask him.

Because 186 happened.

Or was it beacause we didnt have the nouse to get the best available candidate.

Anyone who still thinks that Malthouse was NOT available for the 2012 season is kidding themselves.

The fact that we did not get the best candidate available gives us an insight into why we do not have a winning culture.

For heavens sake, we did not even interview Malthouse for the position.

What person in their right mind would ever pick an untried apprentice over his master, especially when his master is at the peak of his abilities.

If you ever want to identify the root of our problems, just have a look at the people that hired Bailey over Sheedy, and Neeld over Malthouse.

Really, it is unbelieveable.

For the boards sake, Neeld better do well in 2013. It is hard to swallow this constantly silly decision making. It is like having G.W.Bush in charge of your army.


Eddie is quite right to ask how the hell Carlscum will afford Cloke. Everyone wants to know how they get away with dodgy "ambassadorial " roles. Previously that dog was left to sleep, but now Eddie is [censored] off.

This will be fun :)

In the meantime everyones looking over there >>>>>>>>>>>>>>

For the very first time I am with McChins on this one.......dig deep Eddie.

Or was it beacause we didnt have the nouse to get the best available candidate.

Anyone who still thinks that Malthouse was NOT available for the 2012 season is kidding themselves.

The fact that we did not get the best candidate available gives us an insight into why we do not have a winning culture.

For heavens sake, we did not even interview Malthouse for the position.

What person in their right mind would ever pick an untried apprentice over his master, especially when his master is at the peak of his abilities.

If you ever want to identify the root of our problems, just have a look at the people that hired Bailey over Sheedy, and Neeld over Malthouse.

Really, it is unbelieveable.

For the boards sake, Neeld better do well in 2013. It is hard to swallow this constantly silly decision making. It is like having G.W.Bush in charge of your army.

Malthouse could never have coached last year. Hell, he can't even coach until October of this year because of his contract with Collingwood. Also, A Bush joke? Aren't those about 10 years out of date?

MM is going to take Carltank to the cleaners.

My guess would be he agreed with the Wobbles not to coach this year and has been paidout on the agreement.

That would last until the end of the season, let me see oh yes October. So he is not talking to anyone (officially) until then.

Meanwhile the Carlton who have not spoken to him and have nowhere else to go just have to sit a wait whilst MM works out just how big his paper bag will be.

They have not thought through just how much he will cost him directly and indirectly (arizona, facilities, new coaches, and players).

Eddie will slowly increase the pressure, first Judd, then MM is a stress ball, next shouldn't the tanking inquiry extend to Carltank, followed by they are asking all their mid tier players to take a haircut to fit more in the cap.All the defensive stuff he needs to do to spike Cloke and MM taking other wobbles assets.

In the words of paul Keating Eddie is looking forward to doing him slowly.

The upside for us is they need to clear the way for cloke someone has to go and that opens up the trade table a bit more.

The upside for us is they need to clear the way for cloke someone has to go and that opens up the trade table a bit more.

McLean, Hampson, Thornton, Russell ... no thanks.

It's line ball but my money is on Malthouse, Cloke and Carlton causing Eddie to choke on his weetbix.

Or was it beacause we didnt have the nouse to get the best available candidate

Or was it because we didn't want a bitter old hypocrite who was potentially burnt out and who would be joining primarily to spite his old club instead of for more meritable reasons?


Had an amusing thought that Mick might blink in the face of family pressure and knock back the Blue's offer. Long shot I know, but where would that leave the Blues if MM and Roos both decline the "privilege" of coaching the Blues"?

Choco Williams?

An assistant?

Up shlt creek!!!

You have to think this has all been fleshed out for some time now.

This is all just rubber stamping

The Bloos administration comes up looking like bullies in a school yard. "We are the biggest & best & nobody, even one of our superior breed, is going to stand in the way".

This is a clear knee jerk reaction to the baying Lgon St masses & if, - like Jimmy Hird this year - they struggle next year, the split will match the grand canyon.

A potential implosion in the making & who deserves it more!!

 

You have to think this has all been fleshed out for some time now.

This is all just rubber stamping

Agree. Ratten would still be there if Roos and Malthouse were unavailable.

Agree. Ratten would still be there if Roos and Malthouse were unavailable.

This whole situation with Carlton and Malthouse is pathetic. Whilst the media go a million miles an hour at the non-existent tanking story it is obvious to anyone with half a brain that a real story, the fact Malthouse was sounded out for the Carlton job possibly up to a year ago is right under their noses. Some are on to but doing nothing about it and I've heard a few express surprise at Kernahan's pause when he was asked about Malthouse yesterday. It may have been an accident, appears he just forgot his lines.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 126 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 381 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Angry
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies