Jump to content

Pendlebury off the shopping list

Featured Replies

Posted

Apparently he has signed a 4 year extension with the Pies... reported on AFL360.

 

No doubt he would have had overwhelming pressure to sign if he did not wish to sleep with the fishes.

Who was it that signed for one year at the end of last year I forgot?

I want the filth to lose someone. Cloke would be good.

 

Who was it that signed for one year at the end of last year I forgot?

I want the filth to lose someone. Cloke would be good.

Eddie McFat would demand the first 3 picks in the draft.

Who was it that signed for one year at the end of last year I forgot?

It was Pendlebury. All their big names except Cloke are now off the table.

Pendles is a superstar. Wish we had someone of his quality. Hopefully we can trade our first round picks this coming draft to nab an established gun midfielder.


I think it's great to see so many young guns showing loyalty and signing big contracts with their current club.

Tom Scully, you are an even bigger f'ing d'ckhead now than you were last year. Hope you spend the rest of your career struggling on the sidelines.

I think it's great to see so many young guns showing loyalty and signing big contracts with their current club.

Tom Scully, you are an even bigger f'ing d'ckhead now than you were last year. Hope you spend the rest of your career struggling on the sidelines.

From Scully's perspective he made a good choice. The guy's rating was unwarranted - he is ineffective at this level - and he took advantage of KS's payback obsession to secure himself some control over his life. Melbourne did not lose by losing ts.

 

Obviously didn't want to play in more than half empty stadiums.

If the Pies, Bombers or Blues don't lose anyone of significance to the expansion I will be very [censored] off. On Footy Classified Monday night Caroline Wilson heavily indicated that there was a gentlemans agreement between Allen and Eddie not to go after any Collingwood players and I'm sure Sheedy would have similar feelings about the Bombers.


$4mill for 5 years.

GWS paid more for that guy .

I'm petrified that big Max or Stef might get targeted by them .

$4mill for 5 years.

GWS paid more for that guy .

I'm petrified that big Max or Stef might get targeted by them .

They can't mate, GWS can only take one player per club. They already have him, some guy called Scully.

Sigh. Why did we end up with the player who only wanted money. I think now that scully is gone its good that the big clubs are keeping their players and stretching their caps. Puts us in the drivers seat when we decide to steal some players back from GWS.

Sigh. Why did we end up with the player who only wanted money. I think now that scully is gone its good that the big clubs are keeping their players and stretching their caps. Puts us in the drivers seat when we decide to steal some players back from GWS.

I don't think it's that at all.

After shelling out for Scully, Davis and Ward, GWS don't have a lot of cap room to play with for signing out of contract players, unless they want to lose all their kids cos thye can't pay them.


As strange as it sounds, I almost prefer seeing him re-sign with the filth than go to GW$. I hope that the players on our list have this same level of loyalty, unlike HWMNBN

Yep and it looks as though Dangerfield is going to sign for 5 at Adelaide so we are going to have to develop our own. This coming draft is going to be very important to state the obvious.

Whatevs, I am fkn loving Mitch Clark.

We could've still had both.

Anyone that thinks we are botter off without $cummy are kidding themselves. When 100% fit, he was best 18 by a long way, we're crying out for a superstar mid and this bloke is the closest in the league to becomming that. Sure, would've made our salary cap tight, but we would've managed I'm certain.

It seems other top players are sacrificing some big pay days by not going to GW$, and I would imagine that Selwood or Pendle's cotnract wouldn;t be small, but they are still keeping most of their better players at the same time.

We wouldn't have been able to have both in the team because we wouldn't have had the money to throw Mitch Clark's way if we'd already spent it trying to keep Scully.

Much happier seeing Mitch Clark in the team than I'm disappointed that ol mate did a bolter.

My first thought on hearing this was what HWSNBN would think.

Pendlebury could have had $1 mill a year but will take much less and will be a club hero on several levels.

He will never been seen as a mere mercenary.

If anything this cheapens our former number one draft pick in character terms even further.


Whatevs, I am fkn loving Mitch Clark.

Me 500.

The guy has passion

I can tell he is home

They can't mate, GWS can only take one player per club. They already have him, some guy called Scully.

Who?
  • 5 years later...

Pendlebury has fallen out of favour with Bucks it seems. How about we make a move on luring Pendlebury away from the Pies. it would be a massive coup and the most amazing '[censored] you' to the Filth.

Oct 9, 2015 - COLLINGWOOD captain Scott Pendlebury will be a Magpie for life after signing a four-year contract extension.

Oct 16, 2016 - COLLINGWOOD captain Scott Pendlebury says AFL contracts are now meaningless as players demand trade moves in growing numbers

 

Please be gentle with me. :)

 

 
9 minutes ago, DominatrixTyson said:

Pendlebury has fallen out of favour with Bucks it seems. How about we make a move on luring Pendlebury away from the Pies. it would be a massive coup and the most amazing '[censored] you' to the Filth.

Oct 9, 2015 - COLLINGWOOD captain Scott Pendlebury will be a Magpie for life after signing a four-year contract extension.

Oct 16, 2016 - COLLINGWOOD captain Scott Pendlebury says AFL contracts are now meaningless as players demand trade moves in growing numbers

 

Please be gentle with me. :)

 

Bucks will be gone before Pendles needs to make a decision.  A new coach will come in and Pendles will hang around.

The only reason I can see that not happening is if they are desperate to land another first rounder but, again, I don't think it will be Pendles they move on.

ooooooooooooooooouch

all those references to how lucky we were to have Mitch Clark in place of the guy who went to GWS were very painful


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 528 replies