Which guernsey number for Mitch?

[rpfc 27,640]

11

Stynes guernsey offer help snares Clark

I don't think this is correct.

I know hardtack saw it in The WA too.

Clark in his presser said that he had only had a voicemail from Jim and had not spoken to him so I don't think it plausible that he gave him his 11.

[Jonesy!!! 27]

Synes offers Clark #11

http://www.heraldsun...t-1226169127861

Edited October 17, 2011 by Jonesy!!!

[digby wolf 1]

11

[Kiss of Death 708]

I don't like 11. That should be earned, like 31. 1 sounds okay.

[rpfc 27,640]

So many conflicting reports on this.

One fact that seems irrefutable is that he has been offered the 11 and will think it over.

I don't know, I'm conflicted...

I presumed Gawn would follow Stynes from 37 to 11 and as I write this I am struck by how needlessly sentimental that is...

If he wants it he can take it.

He ain't a ruckman anymore though...

[Guest Deefence]

I always liked the idea of Gawn getting #11, so I'm all for him keeping his #1.

Edited October 17, 2011 by Deefence

[Jesse Christ 2,884]

Who cares.

[Fitz Fitzpatrick 886]

Id like to see 11 retired

[Young Blood 2,036]

if he wants 11 and knows who is suggesting it and has worn it I reckon he should have it. Inevitably yes 'who cares'. But he's got that great running and decision making that jimmy had so I reckon it would be a good fit.

If he does get it he should wear a cap for a game to dedicate to Jimmy.

[La Dee-vina Comedia 16,534]

Nm 1. Then he and Nathan Jones can have lockers next to each other and discuss sleave tattoos. And he won't have to change his twitter handle.

I've never thought numbers per se were particularly important. But perhaps who your locker is next to might be. I wonder whether clubs give any thought to the psychology of players when deciding on their numbers.

It means a couple of years ago all our new players were numbered in the high 40s which would have meant their lockers were all together. Intuitively this seems mistaken. I think new players should be mixed in with the more experienced players. Putting a new key position prospect near James Frawley, for example, might make more sense than putting him next to another new player.

[Jordie_tackles 354]

So many conflicting reports on this.

One fact that seems irrefutable is that he has been offered the 11 and will think it over.

I don't know, I'm conflicted...

I presumed Gawn would follow Stynes from 37 to 11 and as I write this I am struck by how needlessly sentimental that is...

If he wants it he can take it.

He ain't a ruckman anymore though...

I agree with this but if Jim has offered, it would nearly be rude to say no.

Not that it would be anything against Jim in anyway, but its probably the most important number at MFC atm

[hardtack 10,150]

Who cares.

+1

[old55 21,638]

I know it's senseless but I'm into the numbers.

Since they hand the numbers over from a significant previous wearer - I think #11 is definitely the go for Clark - the time is ripe.

Would love to see JV in #31, just ticks all the boxes for me.

[rpfc 27,640]

I know it's senseless but I'm into the numbers.

Since they hand the numbers over from a significant previous wearer - I think #11 is definitely the go for Clark - the time is ripe.

Would love to see JV in #31, just ticks all the boxes for me.

So am I for some reason...

And, yes, I would like to see Viney get 31 or 23.

[old55 21,638]

So am I for some reason...

And, yes, I would like to see Viney get 31 or 23.

Yes I'd be very happy with JV in 23 too.