Brent Moloney

[dees_rule_4eva 22]

Absolute horse.

I can't figure that rule out. He didn't get him high, both players going for the ball.

Stiff Brent, very very stiff.

[45HG 1,539]

WHAT?!?!?!?

[Harry Manback 2]

Brent Moloney, Melbourne, has been charged with a Level Two bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence against Tom Logan, Port Adelaide, during the fourth quarter of the Round Nine match between Melbourne and Port Adelaide, played at TIO Stadium on Saturday May 22, 2010.

In summary, his five-year good record means he can accept a one-match sanction with an early plea.

The incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two point). This is a total of five activation points, resulting in a classification of a Level Two offence, drawing 250 demerit points and a two-match sanction. He has an existing five-year good record, reducing the sanction by 25 per cent to 187.50 points and a one-match sanction. An early plea reduces the sanction by 25 per cent to 140.63 points and a one-match sanction.

Match Review Panel Findings

Gys to debut?

[dees_rule_4eva 22]

Match Review Panel Findings

Gys to debut?

Yeah, good chance.

I just re-read that garbage from the AFL, am still in dis-belief.

[Carn dees 108]

What a crock.

[Trisul 654]

"Level Two bumping or making forceful contact from front-on offence against Tom Logan, Port Adelaide"

"The incident was assessed as reckless conduct (two points), low impact (one point) and high contact (two point)."

What a laugh. Didn't get him high, turned the body ..

If the MRP doesn't have eyes, they certainly have an agenda.

Edited May 24, 2010 by Trident

[Eth 4]

What bull[censored]

Oh well, at least Gys will be able to debut and rack up 30 touches.

Edited May 24, 2010 by eth38

[45HG 1,539]

That is unbelievable. I'm actually in shock.

Didn't even get him high! Sylvia got his jaw broken and the guy got nothing. Beamer bumps a bloke, he's fine, then gets a week!

Not as bad as when he failed to touch Bartel in a bump and got three weeks, but still!

[Rhino Richards 1,467]

Not surprising at all given the past inconsistency of the MRP.

Disappointing anyway

[stranga 328]

rubbish charge, there was no head contact other than a trailing arm. Screw you AFL.

[Trisul 654]

That is unbelievable. I'm actually in shock.

Didn't even get him high! Sylvia got his jaw broken and the guy got nothing. Beamer bumps a bloke, he's fine, then gets a week!

Not as bad as when he failed to touch Bartel in a bump and got three weeks, but still!

[predman 0]

He should have waited for the ball to clear. Then got the Port player in a headlock, thrown him to the ground and would only have been up for a 3 k fine at the tribunal... weird system.

[beelzebub 22,761]

The Match Review Panel are Week by week , showing themselves more and more nefarious . Whilst I'm not going to become morbidly focused on the unfairness of this outcome it needs to be said that its manifestly shoody in evaluation by comparison to other transgressions.

Lets just look to teh silver lining and the opportunity the club and a player now gets.

[Jarka 767]

Moloney got 1 week for being stupid, and he probably deserved it based on recent decisions. It's tough but I'm not surprised it happened. At least he gets a week off to freshen up

[#MYHEARTBEATSTRUE 27]

What a load of [censored]! i say take it to the tribunal and challenge the charge... anyone else agree?

[Green Machine 63]

Joke. An absolute joke. I cannot believe this.

[dees_rule_4eva 22]

What a load of [censored]! i say take it to the tribunal and challenge the charge... anyone else agree?

Yes, I'd challenge it. Dispute the high contact part, seeing as he hit his shoulder.

Is the shoulder high contact?? Not fkn likely!!!

If he does go, he is a huge loss to the midfield. He has been terrific all year, and IMO would be close to winning our B&F.

[Sir Why You Little 35,356]

So josh kennedy was not even cited for breaking a Jaw...Maloney gets a week for a "True" Hip & shoulder.....Are they on Drugs the MRP? That is just wrong.

[Deestroy All 14,262]

What a load of [censored]! i say take it to the tribunal and challenge the charge... anyone else agree?

Yep.

My case would be 'banana cake wheel barrow and avenue zinc squared test tube.'

He'll either get off or 4 weeks, reckon he'll get off with that argument.

[Whispering_Jack 28,128]

Last time Beamer was suspended he didn't make any contact at all with Jimmy Bartel.

At least this time he made some contact with the other player's side so one week is fair enough, especially in light of the MRP's decision when Colin Sylvia's jaw was broken when the ball wasn't within 10 metres.

[45HG 1,539]

Mitch Farmer deliberately elbowed Michael Hurley in the back of the head and can get off with a reprimand!

[Sir Why You Little 35,356]

Mitch Farmer deliberately elbowed Michael Hurley in the back of the head and can get off with a reprimand!

The MRP is as relevent as tattslotto. I am so mad at this.

[The Great One 99 125]

Even though there was certainly no malice, I think he was always going to get a week. Sucks the big ones but not suprising. Just more dissapointing that it is against the Cats when he is going to miss.

[GRUN DEE 69]

Up your's AFL! Your tribunal stinks!

Moloney get's 2 for which he should'nt have been reported. Very minimal contact and did'nt even get him high!

Davenport 1 game for a punch in the gut's which floored Garland. A joke! Worth 2!

And that other sniper Shulz get's a reprimand. Joke Joke! Worth 2!

Have a rest Malones! Take the 1 game and freshen up for Carlscum. Go Dee's!

[Binmans PA 26,749]

Sorry to play devil's advocate, but I thought he deserved it. I don't care that he didn't necessarily hit him, but it was undisciplined and at a crucial point in the game. I thought he lead with his shoulder and it was a dangerous piece of play. That said, I've seen players do worse and get off.