Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

I assume clubs privately talk about serious and reasonably specific expectations for what their list is capable of in the coming season. And what they determine presumably informs all sorts of decisions - list management being at the top of the list.

First, am I wrong?

And if not, what do you think the honest consensus would have been inside the club in October?

 
 

I think the club would back itself to be returning to finals contention.

Most likely shellshocked that the players are struggling with the change of game plan.

I know I am

  • Author
11 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

I think the club would back itself to be returning to finals contention.

I thought the same, which would explain what several others on the forum have raised concerns about: the relatively gentle approach to the list last year.

On the face of it, eight out and eight in seems like a good prune, but that includes Brayshaw from a year ago, two retirements, Joel Smith and a seemingly unexpected trade request from ANB.


Surely the expectations would have been finals? I know we had a shocker last year but we still won 11 matches and were getting Trac back, plus a fit Oliver and 2 high draft picks.

Top 4 was what they were saying in pre-season. They dont say those things publically unless they are confident.

What i think is they got served a reality check the last two rounds.

44 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

I think the club would back itself to be returning to finals contention.

Most likely shellshocked that the players are struggling with the change of game plan.

I know I am

While i expect a more spirited performance this week your view on the gameplan is off we don't have the midfield to do it and the games against the roos and the sun's showed that up big time Oliver and Viney and co just ran around chasing stops all day, I have been saying this since 2022 lack of pace and skills are hurting us big time.

We have been trying to work out a forward line for the last 4 years time to get someone in to help educate the players on forward craft.

 
6 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

Top 4 was what they were saying in pre-season. They dont say those things publically unless they are confident.

What i think is they got served a reality check the last two rounds.

Who and where did they say this?

Delusional if true.

I’m pretty sure I heard Gawn say it in the lead up to the season. Something along the lines we know we have the talent on the list.


46 minutes ago, The Lobster Effect said:

Surely the expectations would have been finals? I know we had a shocker last year but we still won 11 matches and were getting Trac back, plus a fit Oliver and 2 high draft picks.

It's genuinely shocking that we're miles worse with Trac and Oliver back into the side. Every Melbourne supporter pinned their hopes on these two.

My expectation was 11th -14th due to our forward line on paper. So I'm not shocked we're going to miss finals. I am shocked about how bad we could potentially be this year, and how bad our talented players such as Gawn, JVR, Fritsch, May and Viney have been. If these players can lift to somewhere near their average, then we'll start winning a game or 2.

If you listen to Round 1 and 2 post pressers from Goody, they were about managing expectations.

The club knows that the transition game style took a number of rounds for Collingwood to click in 2022 and for Hawthorn to click last year.

I'm sure they were hoping we had Windsor, McVee and Lindsay available to us in those games Kozzy was missing, and were hoping we'd eek out 2 wins from the first three fixtures before Kozzy's return.

I'd say we're below par, but we'll know more by the middle of the year.

I'd say they'd want to be close to equal ledgering by that point.

Edited by Adam The God

55 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

Top 4 was what they were saying in pre-season. They dont say those things publically unless they are confident.

What i think is they got served a reality check the last two rounds.

Am sure Dockers, Blues and others were saying it as well.

You have to aim for a good result and if you don’t make it, so be it.

I wonder when the last club prediction was “we will finish last two.”

8 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

It's genuinely shocking that we're miles worse with Trac and Oliver back into the side. Every Melbourne supporter pinned their hopes on these two.

My expectation was 11th -14th due to our forward line on paper. So I'm not shocked we're going to miss finals. I am shocked about how bad we could potentially be this year, and how bad our talented players such as Gawn, JVR, Fritsch, May and Viney have been. If these players can lift to somewhere near their average, then we'll start winning a game or 2.

I don’t think the Players are mentally and physically fit enough to play the gameplan Goodwin wants.

Our Final Quarters have been uncompetitive

That is on the entire Football Department.

Such a shame we had to lose Burgess, i think that is a serious root cause to all this.

Selwyn needs to up his game…

I remember Goodwin saying he believed we have a team to challenge the very best. For me that means Top 8 to Top 4.

There would be alarm bells going.


2 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

I remember Goodwin saying he believed we have a team to challenge the very best. For me that means Top 8 to Top 4.

There would be alarm bells going.

With Langford and Lindsay coming in, the Club is expecting September action

This is not the start they wanted

Goodwin must make changes

46 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

I don’t think the Players are mentally and physically fit enough to play the gameplan Goodwin wants.

Our Final Quarters have been uncompetitive

That is on the entire Football Department.

Such a shame we had to lose Burgess, i think that is a serious root cause to all this.

Selwyn needs to up his game…

I agree, but for the life of me l can’t work out what the game plan is.

We chip it around in the backline trying to get some space but turn it over through the middle or still bomb it into the forward line

6 minutes ago, Billy said:

I agree, but for the life of me l can’t work out what the game plan is.

We chip it around in the backline trying to get some space but turn it over through the middle or still bomb it into the forward line

Because we are not spreading enough into space

Good teams can do it for 4 Quarters

Any news from the press conference


2 hours ago, Adam The God said:

If you listen to Round 1 and 2 post pressers from Goody, they were about managing expectations.

The club knows that the transition game style took a number of rounds for Collingwood to click in 2022 and for Hawthorn to click last year.

I'm sure they were hoping we had Windsor, McVee and Lindsay available to us in those games Kozzy was missing, and were hoping we'd eek out 2 wins from the first three fixtures before Kozzy's return.

I'd say we're below par, but we'll know more by the middle of the year.

I'd say they'd want to be close to equal ledgering by that point.

I think most of us were reasonably happy with rd 1. The effort was there.

Rd 2 and rd 3 saw an alarming drop off in basic skills - chest marks, tackling, kicking, handballing, two way running etc.

Our expectations are that we know how to do those basics already (except for goal kicking which is a shambles). Getting the ball turned over because we are trying to run and handball fwd or kick into the corridor etc is something we can live with short term.

What the club has dished up is sadly reminiscent of the dark days of 2012-2013

4 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

I think most of us were reasonably happy with rd 1. The effort was there.

Rd 2 and rd 3 saw an alarming drop off in basic skills - chest marks, tackling, kicking, handballing, two way running etc.

Our expectations are that we know how to do those basics already (except for goal kicking which is a shambles). Getting the ball turned over because we are trying to run and handball fwd or kick into the corridor etc is something we can live with short term.

What the club has dished up is sadly reminiscent of the dark days of 2012-2013

Completely agree mate.

It's why I was so disappointed with the Suns match, because aside from 15 minutes or so in the whole match, we didn't try to control the ball and maintain possession on slow plays, we went for long high kicks to the contest. I think Max took one contested mark in this sort of long down the line situation, otherwise I can't remember another one.

It annoyed me greatly, and I hope the coaches too, that we didn't try to maintain possession with short kicks to drag the opposition zone out, and keep them thinking. Instead we dropped simple marks, missed easy handballs and failed to hit 15m targets under almost no pressure.

The internal expectations would be that with Kozzy, Windsor, Lever and Spargo back in the side, we put up a much stronger showing against Geelong.

It may well get ugly on turnover on that funny shaped ground at GMHBA, but as long as we keep going for 'it', and don't go for the easy long down the line option every time, I'll be relatively happy.

And by 'it', I mean on fast plays, from turnover use the corridor, hit simple targets, run, carry and show dare of ball movement and from stoppage use aggressive forward handball, blocks and run in waves (see Round 1). And on slow plays, we chip to maintain possession, and chip the ball to shift the zone of the opposition and keep them guessing.

I also wonder whether we need to play Fritta from the goal square, JVR at CHF and Turner deeper with Fritta. Fritta is really the only forward who knows how to draw the ball on the lead. Our forward instruction appears to be hold back and not lead from slow plays, leaving space in front of you for the kicker to hit and you to lead into. With more confidence in the team, maybe this works. It worked much better against GWS, but we also looked to move the ball quicker.

Anyway, I'd hope the coaching staff are very disappointed with the way the team went away from what they're trying to do, and even more so, I hope some of the players (particularly our leaders) hang their heads in shame a bit. Because our stoppage, contest and defensive transition game was amateurish.

 
3 hours ago, Adam The God said:

I'm sure they were hoping we had Windsor, McVee and Lindsay available to us in those games Kozzy was missing

Also McAdam.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 30 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 152 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 529 replies