Jump to content

Featured Replies

15 minutes ago, bing181 said:

To get better first round picks.

Which is a rebuild, no?

We've already seen the benefits this season with both Lindsay and Langford. They both come straight in and fill a roll.

We've done it once to get better picks, last year, for a player who was probably ready to go.

A rebuild to me is slashing the salary cap, trading out top 10 calibre players to accumulate more picks and focussing predominately on youth.

Edited by layzie

 
23 minutes ago, bing181 said:

There are a dozen other clubs who could say the same thing. You then lose a few important players to injury or whatnot, you have an unsettled line-up, you have players coming back from long-term/serious injury, etc.etc., and you quickly get passed by any of the other 12.

Reckon a dozen is an understatement for 2025 tbh

 

Does anybody know how the draft will work for us next year? We get White and Sinnema, what picks will they be? Oliver has to go he started our backward slide should have went last year. If we give him away for nothing so be it. I want Trac but if he set on leaving so be it same with Kossie. We are stuffed I don't think we will do another 7 year contract again.

13 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

Does anybody know how the draft will work for us next year? We get White and Sinnema, what picks will they be? Oliver has to go he started our backward slide should have went last year. If we give him away for nothing so be it. I want Trac but if he set on leaving so be it same with Kossie. We are stuffed I don't think we will do another 7 year contract again.

If Jeff White has any influence over his son He should suggest Kelani stays on the gold coast instead of joining the career killers


12 minutes ago, Kent said:

If Jeff White has any influence over his son He should suggest Kelani stays on the gold coast instead of joining the career killers

ridiculous

more likely to encourage his son to follow his path and help build the club back up again

Almost impossible to receive any benefit from trading Petracca, Oliver and Viney,, and Gone.

They have massive multiple year contracts that we are up for.

Nobody will be crazy enough to take up the payments and handover picks or players as well.

They are basically giveaways with us paying half their salaries.

Full slash rebuilds are not the way.

We've already been rejuvenating the list so it isn't needed.

Just have to keep picking the right players to compliment the youngsters we already have.

 

We have been rebuilding since 2021.

We have “lost” Jackson,Hibberd,Harmes,Bedford,Brown,Gus,and Nibbler.

With Pickett I would try get a your tall defender or picks.

I am not certain but I think Yze is another father/son pick, which makes 3 I think. So we need a lot of picks.

I would go to Oliver, Pettracca and Viney and tell them if they agree to lower payment, we will trade him as son as someone wants him.

I would instantly start playing Adams, Culley, Fullerton and Mentha. I know people were saying last year that Fullerton is not good enough. But they also said Jefferson wasn't.

Once Adams is established, we delist May. Too old. If we get a defender from Pickett we drop Lever too. The only reason I keep McDonald is he can play both ends.

Once Fullerton can ruck, we can rest Gawn next year and start playing Verral

Cully and maybe Sestan will gain experience with our top 3 mids.

Before all this we need to extend Rivers' contract or maybe lose him to Tasmania.


16 hours ago, BKKBooga said:

Don't believe in rebuilds. Fullstop.

Roos rebuilt the list which eventuatualy led to a premiership

You might be thinking of the failed rebuild from 2007 to 2011

Doesn't get talked about much.but Roos turned over more than 30 players in 3 off-seasons

3 hours ago, bluey said:

Almost impossible to receive any benefit from trading Petracca, Oliver and Viney,, and Gone.

They have massive multiple year contracts that we are up for.

Nobody will be crazy enough to take up the payments and handover picks or players as well.

They are basically giveaways with us paying half their salaries.

Try and remember Bluey and everyone else wanting to give away or suggesting that we actually pay the salary of our top end players, get a grip it is round 3. They are coming back from a multitude of issues that may take 6-8 games to iron the bugs out. Oliver is playing so much better than last year, Tracc needs some match fitness and belief, they will all play better as we get all our young guns back out on the park and they rekindle the spark. We just need to keep adding quality each year and replace those that aren’t up for the Fight. We all need to be up for the Fight and get behind the club. 2024 is Over!!!!!

2 hours ago, Demonic Dave said:

With Pickett I would try get a your tall defender or picks.

I am not certain but I think Yze is another father/son pick, which makes 3 I think. So we need a lot of picks.

I would go to Oliver, Pettracca and Viney and tell them if they agree to lower payment, we will trade him as son as someone wants him.

I would instantly start playing Adams, Culley, Fullerton and Mentha. I know people were saying last year that Fullerton is not good enough. But they also said Jefferson wasn't.

Once Adams is established, we delist May. Too old. If we get a defender from Pickett we drop Lever too. The only reason I keep McDonald is he can play both ends.

Once Fullerton can ruck, we can rest Gawn next year and start playing Verral

Cully and maybe Sestan will gain experience with our top 3 mids.

Before all this we need to extend Rivers' contract or maybe lose him to Tasmania.

Is this a joke?

1 hour ago, Macca said:

Roos rebuilt the list which eventuatualy led to a premiership

You might be thinking of the failed rebuild from 2007 to 2011

Doesn't get talked about much.but Roos turned over more than 30 players in 3 off-seasons

That is true Macca but fortunately we don’t need to turn over 30 players now, we turned over or retired 8 last year and possibly need to retire or turn over another 8-10 this year. We need a KPD, a KPF a Ruck and another Sml Fwd plus quality depth. Then rinse and repeat each subsequent year.

2 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

That is true Macca but fortunately we don’t need to turn over 30 players now, we turned over or retired 8 last year and possibly need to retire or turn over another 8-10 this year. We need a KPD, a KPF a Ruck and another Sml Fwd plus quality depth. Then rinse and repeat each subsequent year.

We need mids and guys who can run and kick. Our key position stocks are fine as is bar a replacement for Gawn.


12 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

We need mids and guys who can run and kick. Our key position stocks are fine as is bar a replacement for Gawn.

I’m thinking more long term Roost it far, White will provide one of those three needs if we get him. I would be putting more intensive training into Woey, Bill and Seston this year to try and salvage at least one of them.

1 hour ago, DeeZone said:

That is true Macca but fortunately we don’t need to turn over 30 players now, we turned over or retired 8 last year and possibly need to retire or turn over another 8-10 this year. We need a KPD, a KPF a Ruck and another Sml Fwd plus quality depth. Then rinse and repeat each subsequent year.

I wouldn't be turning over 30 players ... far from it

I just made a comment about the Roos rebuild (which is rarely referenced)

But we might need a bit of a cleanout if we are serious about another assault on the flag

The bulk of the old group isn't going to win our next flag

If augers well, we could be able to challenge in 2027 but we can make finals in 2026

As for this year, it's more of a year where we practice and work on a new game plan

And at seasons end we need an influx of fast, skilled players (another 3 or 4 would be handy)

But we need to trade aggressively, DZ

3 hours ago, Macca said:

Roos rebuilt the list which eventuatualy led to a premiership

You might be thinking of the failed rebuild from 2007 to 2011

Doesn't get talked about much.but Roos turned over more than 30 players in 3 off-seasons

This is what I think of when the term rebuild is mentioned. Knocking down the house and starting again.

Trading up for an occasional first rounder and injecting a little youth isn't what I'd call a rebuild.

Edited by layzie

3 minutes ago, layzie said:

This is what I think of when the term rebuild is mentioned. Knocking down the house and starting again.

Trading up for an occasional first rounder and injecting a little youth isn't what I'd call a rebuild.

I'm calling for rebuild (of sorts)

Slightly bigger than a mini rebuild

6 minutes ago, Macca said:

I'm calling for rebuild (of sorts)

Slightly bigger than a mini rebuild

Maybe a re-modeling?

What about a renovation with a rooftop garden?


21 minutes ago, layzie said:

Maybe a re-modeling?

What about a renovation with a rooftop garden?

Well the list is definitely not the equivalent of a shotgun shack makin' way for units

As for rebuilding through the draft (our best bet due to JT) ... if we could somehow get hold of 5 or 6 picks in the top 30 in the 2025 draft, that part-rebuild would be well on it's way

Of course, we'd have to give up a bit but what if we were giving up players who don't want to be part of the club going forward?

Edited by Macca

1 hour ago, Macca said:

Well the list is definitely not the equivalent of a shotgun shack makin' way for units

As for rebuilding through the draft (our best bet due to JT) ... if we could somehow get hold of 5 or 6 picks in the top 30 in the 2025 draft, that part-rebuild would be well on it's way

Of course, we'd have to give up a bit but what if we were giving up players who don't want to be part of the club going forward?

That would certainly force our hand Macca but we aren’t in that situation at this point in time.

9 minutes ago, DeeZone said:

That would certainly force our hand Macca but we aren’t in that situation at this point in time.

Watch this space, DZ

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 599 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies