Jump to content

Featured Replies

21 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

This is a completely concocted story. The coach gave a tiny fraction of something away and now it’s being used to bash the club. Tom Morris is a scum bag.

Mate that wasn't a 'tiny fraction' of what was given away. You're bringing someones private personal matter into an open platform watched by a thousand journo's and every other Joe blow that exists out there.

All we did was give Morris unnecessary ammo.

Β 
5 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

If Goody had half a brain he should have just shut up re Max.

If.....Β 

I thought we were playing Damien Barrett sliding doors for a moment

IF... Goody had half a brain, beelzebub

THEN .... He would have solved the forward 50 issues years ago.Β 

3 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

Kingy this AM / last night said the era is over. I'm glad he finally got the memo, i think most knew it was over in 2024 and 25+ was about how we could reinvent ourselves to contend again. those thinking we are genuine chance this year were perhaps a bit fanciful in their expectations.

Im glad he landed on the correct side finally, the era has been over since the end of 2023 like you say, but King is talking out both sides of his mouth *shock horror I know*, last week after the Giants game he said we'd be good this year.Β 

 

The long and the short...

Alastair knows what he's doing

Simon got lucky.

The luck was short lived.

On reflection I thought we did pretty well to still be in the game at thre quarter time. For 3 quarters we kept coming back which shouldn't be overlooked. The 6 goals in 7 minute burst has made everyone forget the effort put in for 3 quarters. We gifted goals from some awful turn overs, and on 2 occasions being to slow to kick and got run down. Its not Goody fault that Langdon kicks it over Claytons head to the opposition who goal or Bowser shanking a kick into the middle of the ground straight to 2 North players Β nor is it his fault when Woewodin butchers a bounce in the middle of the ground when all our players are running forward. It happened last week and again Sunday when players over run the ball, miss handballs or have the tackle broken. Non of this is Goodwins fault and it rests entirely with the playing group who should own it.

Structurally we were too short. AJ was replaced by Spargo and when Jeffo busted his hand and is replaced by Woewodin we are too small. Small wonder Comben had 8 intercept marks, he was on a midget (not helped by not lowering our eyes when delivering the ball). It was error to expect Max to solely compete against Xerri . Last time they met he was out muscling Max and they had no plan B despite Campbell handling Xerri fairly well in the practice game.

Windsor covers a lot of cracks with his blinding speed as will Picket on return. Howes was all Australian under 18 as a wing/half forward. He is to slighlty built to hold down a key back post. Fritch & Disco aren't strong enough to hold down key posts and I doubt they ever will

The issue is our best 6 are very good but as stated by Adam Simpson our bottom 6 players Β is where the issue lies. Injuries happen and last year the Pies struggled untill they got their best side together. May, Windsor, McVee, Picket and to a lesser extent Melksham will make a big difference. The have backup ruckman in AJ and Campbell use them

Windsor, Kolt, Lindsay & Langford are the class we need to develop but they are babies in the system but are part of the rebuild


1 hour ago, Demon Disciple said:

Maybe for refunds

Maybe so they can book accommodation at Buller

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Mate that wasn't a 'tiny fraction' of what was given away. You're bringing someones private personal matter into an open platform watched by a thousand journo's and every other Joe blow that exists out there.

All we did was give Morris unnecessary ammo.

We did but to bash the club with it is offensive in the extreme.

4 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

We did but to bash the club with it is offensive in the extreme.

That's the landscape of journalism these days but.

You give them a sniff and they'll come like a pack of wolves.

This is very much on us then it is on the journalism side of things. When you air personal matters out as what Goodwin did then they'll come from all angles.

Β 
5 hours ago, roy11 said:

I know its only round 2, but I'm looking at the Kicking Efficiency % season average so far

Viney - 44.8%
Petracca - 40%
Sparrow - 38.5%

All 3 are quite high in the metres gained component - is it just the long bomb or do we have too many butchers?
Β 

Seriously why are you just saying this now? What have you been watching for the last 3 years???? Or for their entire careers?Β 


28 minutes ago, fr_ap said:

Seriously why are you just saying this now? What have you been watching for the last 3 years???? Or for their entire careers?Β 

Sparrow’s career average for kicking efficiency is 59%, so I’m just saying it’s quite a bit down at present

1 hour ago, Older demon said:

Howes was all Australian under 18 as a wing/half forward. He is to slighlty built to hold down a key back post.

Which is where he was played at Casey - with limited success. Which is why they've been trying to reinvent him as a defender.

Losing Jefferson created a big structural issue. While he may not have had a possession in the first quarter and may not have had a huge influence had he played out the game, he was occupying one of the 3 North tall defenders. When he went off, it meant Pink and Corr took care of Turner and JVR and Comben was left to play against a small. Comben was then able to free himself up (not concerned with his opponent taking a mark) to be third man up in aerial contests and intercept mark at will.

If you slow down the AFL360 vision, it shows this exactly. In the first contest, the ball is kicked long and high to a 3v3. Fritsch on McDonald, Trac on Corr and JVR on Pink. Comben comes over the top as the extra man and marks it. Before the ball gets there, his opponent Henderson can be seen on the screen trailing 15m away from the contest. So Comben has left Henderson, who failed to occupy dangerous space, and has intercept marked unopposed. Pause dazzle's video at 52 seconds and it shows this.

In the second contest, the ball is again kicked long to a 2v2. JVR on Corr and Trac on Pink. Again Comben comes in as the extra man and marks unopposed. However, on this occasion (pause dazzle's video at 57 seconds), we had two players unmarked at around the 50m line who did get to dangerous space but were not used (one of whom is Henderson, presumably Comben's opponent again).

So what does this show us? Well first it shows the structural hole left by a tall going off and allowing Comben the peace of mind to play on a small and free himself up. But that doesn't excuse what comes next, as coaches and players had the chance at 1/4 time and 1/2 time to react to the situation. So in the first contest, the long kick to a 3v3 isn't necessarily a bad decision, but Henderson has made the mistake of failing to get to dangerous space which allows Comben to zone off him. In the second contest, Henderson (and one other, maybe Chandler?) actually get separation inside 50 but the kicker fails to lower the eyes and goes long to a 2v2, which again Comben mops up as the loose man. This time it's a decision error from the kicker, as Henderson at least got to dangerous space and should've been used.

I think it shows it's not just one thing, but a combination of getting the structure right, the forwards getting to the right spots and the kickers making good decisions. If one thing breaks down, the whole connection doesn't work.

Compare and contrast this to the week prior where JVR smartly dragged Sam Taylor to the goal square and we nullified his ability to intercept mark in D50.

1 hour ago, Older demon said:

Structurally we were too short. AJ was replaced by Spargo and when Jeffo busted his hand and is replaced by Woewodin we are too small. Small wonder Comben had 8 intercept marks, he was on a midget (not helped by not lowering our eyes when delivering the ball).

I think this is an underrated point. I don’t know how we can keep playing Bowey, Spargo, Henderson, Sharp in the same team, you can’t have that many little blokes in one team in today’s footy. Throw in Langdon and that’s 5 out of 22 who aren’t gonna take an overhead mark..Β 


18 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

Possibly, its all about playing to your strengths. A smaller forward line will need even quicker ball movement as they thrive in space, using their speed and agility to score. Having some tall lumber in their allows a focal point for which smalls can crumb. Yesterday we didnt adjust to the Jeffo injury and were kicking it straight to an outnumber in Comben and made the guy to look like an AA CHB but even if we did, we are no good when the ball hits the deck and dont apply enough pressure when the oppo defence is trying to exit.Β 

Doesn't Aaron Davey have a couple of sons?

Flash=Forward pressure

11 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Β 

Just thought folk should watch this again.

You could feel his frustration 🫀 

Don'tΒ  we allΒ 

18 hours ago, In Harmes Way said:

Whilst I'm not blaming the venue, I hope we never play at Marvel again.

didn't we win 15 in a row there at one point?


11 hours ago, Older demon said:

Structurally we were too short. AJ was replaced by Spargo and when Jeffo busted his hand and is replaced by Woewodin we are too small. Small wonder Comben had 8 intercept marks, he was on a midget (not helped by not lowering our eyes when delivering the ball). It was error to expect Max to solely compete against Xerri . Last time they met he was out muscling Max and they had no plan B despite Campbell handling Xerri fairly well in the practice game.

Hmm so how about DON'T KEEP BOMBING THE BALL INTO THE 50m ZONE?

19 entries in the 3rd qtr for 2 goals

Its the same problem we have had since Adam was a boy. It can't be that hard.

Our coaching group are incapable of fixing it and our leaders are incapable of lowering their eyes. Viney the worst culprit but they are all the same - Oliver, Tracc, Gawn, Sparrow, Langdon

they must be morons to keep doing it.

Β 

It makes us unwatchable.

I might suggest any Marvel Hoodoo is an Urban Myth.Β  It's as invented as the backstory to theΒ  villain of a Scooby Doo episide

1 minute ago, titan_uranus said:

We went 13-4 at Marvel from 2017-2023. 0-2 since.

Speedy reply ! well done!

Β 

Our foward line drops from being ok in ability when pickett is there due to his class to below average when he is not there. The norf practice match turned when he came on in the last quarter. We sruggle without him.Β 

Lets not completely lose it though, we are 1 and 1 in terms of acceptable performances

Edited by Demons1858

2 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Β 

Our coaching group are incapable of fixing it and our leaders are incapable of lowering their eyes. Viney the worst culprit but they are all the same - Oliver, Tracc, Gawn, Sparrow, Langdon

There are two aspects to this though, its not just having the composure or time to lower the eyes, it is having forwards run to create space and options, this aspect is on the coaching group (similar issues to the Blues to be honest).


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.Β  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Thanks
    • 189 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fieryΒ interaction between Max Gawn and Steven MayΒ at the end of the gameΒ was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Sad
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 533 replies