Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

Thought you'd be leading the charge campaigning for the flaming Demon rpfc 😉

IMG_3341.jpeg.337b5cf383805726a7872d418f801be6.jpeg
IMG_3343.jpeg.b9d0b035eede5b56b3ef04fffcd3606a.jpeg

 

Doc Brown GIF by Back to the Future Trilogy

 
12 hours ago, 58er said:

Outdated and the second is Not even  our real colours. Navy blue more than some royal style is our colours.

And haven’t we won the 2021 flag with this newer emblem. 

Let's worry about what happens on the field and matters like this can be addressed when we are 17 flags atop the premiership race. 

Changing emblems like flags always indicates a lack  of self confidence IMO as the real issue is changing our style out on the ground and winning.

That makes a greater Football Club with continuity and confidence not tinkering at the edges. 

 

This has got nothing to do with onfield matters. 
A Club Emblem/Logo is all about getting young kids on board 

We have a large void to fill in that respect, which all started back in the mid 60’s when Television started to show Saturday Replays in Prime Time. Sadly this coincided with our fall down the ladder, which meant The MFC were very rarely on and when we were on, it was usually a heavy loss. The result being Kids followed other teams

It wasn’t cool to be a Melbourne Supporter…

The problem still exists, we have to grow our Membership and the lifeblood of that is Young Kids 

So an Emblem that they want to identify with and wear, is very important. 
 

I don’t mind our current logo, it’s ok, but i do think it is a little bland

I think a Demon with a Trident is needed with Flames too….!!
 

I would love to see a Japanese demon style. Like the one I've just changed my profile picture to.

 
8 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

This has got nothing to do with onfield matters. 
A Club Emblem/Logo is all about getting young kids on board 

no it's not

a club emblem / logo is about standard and consistent branding to be instantly recognisable and associated with the product as it is

simple and direct works, and not changing it willynilly all the time too

the 'demon spirit' stuff has enough frills around it to supposedly be appealing but personally i think the notion of our emblem having any effect whatsoever on our appeal to younger generations is a complete misnomer

26 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

no it's not

a club emblem / logo is about standard and consistent branding to be instantly recognisable and associated with the product as it is

simple and direct works, and not changing it willynilly all the time too

the 'demon spirit' stuff has enough frills around it to supposedly be appealing but personally i think the notion of our emblem having any effect whatsoever on our appeal to younger generations is a complete misnomer

Well that just means we disagree 

we need to engage the younger generations 

An Emblem can do that, as long as the product on the field is winning 


 
32 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

the only decent demon caricatures i've seen were all done by weg.   the rest ... meh

The ‘64 Weg should be hung in the Louvre. It’s a work of absolute genius!

IMG_8815.jpeg

Edited by Sir Why You Little

I definitely think for new fans, whether they are young kids growing up with footy or adults new to the game for whatever reason; logos, colours, jumpers are all pretty influential.

If anyone has ever watched a “New to AFL” YouTube video, it’s pretty much the first criteria potential support is based on. 


It would make sense to have a flag somewhere in our emblem. A high flying one. Since that's what our song says.

20 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

image.png.d7fd2d3b904b4c4c0bded472beac70a4.png

♥️

This one on merchandise, especially on caps and polo shirts, looks the best. People who don’t even follow the MBL wear the “NY” caps and shirts (NY Yankees) because it’s seen as a brand. We should be attempting to create the same. 

spacer.png

Just saying, that yes the CS logo was a mess, but it did one thing I loved - claiming the Eureka southern cross, which I thought was a brilliant idea as no other club has and I think the cross is an awesome logo and would quite happily claim it for the football club and get it away from the CFMEU, right wing crazies, and anyone else who didn’t understand that it was about a fair go, justice and equality. Anyway soap box broken now, and yes overall it was too messy bar that one good idea.

Hard to believe a guy with the username "BringBackTheDemon" wants the Demon back I know, but:

The current logo is a blatant rip off of the Brooklyn Nets and New York Yankees.

Cameron Schwab's monstrosity was a blatant rip off of Liverpool.

The Flamehead logo is original and epic. Bring it back full time. 

I will say the current logo is better than "Demon Spirit" though, so unbelievably cringe. You've stuck with this for years now (why??) yet "Give em Hell" only lasted 1 season and that brought us a premiership and is far better for marketing.

 

Edited by BringBackTheDemon

1 hour ago, BringBackTheDemon said:

Hard to believe a guy with the username "BringBackTheDemon" wants the Demon back I know, but:

The current logo is a blatant rip off of the Brooklyn Nets and New York Yankees.

Cameron Schwab's monstrosity was a blatant rip off of Liverpool.

The Flamehead logo is original and epic. Bring it back full time. 

I will say the current logo is better than "Demon Spirit" though, so unbelievably cringe. You've stuck with this for years now (why??) yet "Give em Hell" only lasted 1 season and that brought us a premiership and is far better for marketing.

 

‘Blatant rip off’

What can one do with a logo that some club somewhere hasn’t already done?

Any logo will be a ‘blatant rip off of something else’ so that shouldn’t be a determining factor at all.


21 minutes ago, rpfc said:

‘Blatant rip off’

What can one do with a logo that some club somewhere hasn’t already done?

Any logo will be a ‘blatant rip off of something else’ so that shouldn’t be a determining factor at all.

My point was the late 90s-2000s logo was original which made it awesome. 

2 hours ago, BringBackTheDemon said:

Hard to believe a guy with the username "BringBackTheDemon" wants the Demon back I know, but:

The current logo is a blatant rip off of the Brooklyn Nets and New York Yankees.

Cameron Schwab's monstrosity was a blatant rip off of Liverpool.

The Flamehead logo is original and epic. Bring it back full time. 

I will say the current logo is better than "Demon Spirit" though, so unbelievably cringe. You've stuck with this for years now (why??) yet "Give em Hell" only lasted 1 season and that brought us a premiership and is far better for marketing.

 

Except we pre-date the Yankees and Mets and so does that specific logo (overlapped MFC initials).

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

5 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Except we pre-date the Yankees and Nets and so does that specific logo (overlapped MFC)

did the baggers have that overlapping letters logo before we did?

  • Author
5 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

This one on merchandise, especially on caps and polo shirts, looks the best. People who don’t even follow the MBL wear the “NY” caps and shirts (NY Yankees) because it’s seen as a brand. We should be attempting to create the same. 

spacer.png

Agreed. That looks so much better on the hats than the full emblem. 

53 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Except we pre-date the Yankees and Mets and so does that specific logo (overlapped MFC initials).

A quick google search and I dont think we pre date the Yankees using the overlapping initials at all, the Yankees first used it in 1909. Happy to be corrected. 


1 hour ago, BringBackTheDemon said:

A quick google search and I dont think we pre date the Yankees using the overlapping initials at all, the Yankees first used it in 1909. Happy to be corrected. 

Carlton also introduced the “CFC” initials logo to their jumper in 1909 (was used prior to this, just not on their jumper). I found evidence of us using the MFC initials in 1897. But I do acknowledge that the style of logo is synonymous with the New York teams mentioned. I just think it looks good on our merchandise, and branding is super important.

2 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Carlton also introduced the “CFC” initials logo to their jumper in 1909 (was used prior to this, just not on their jumper). I found evidence of us using the MFC initials in 1897. But I do acknowledge that the style of logo is synonymous with the New York teams mentioned. I just think it looks good on our merchandise, and branding is super important.

Can you link me to where you found us using it in 1897 please? I struggled to find any early emblems for us, interested to see the old ones. 

 
4 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Except we pre-date the Yankees and Mets and so does that specific logo (overlapped MFC initials).

 

4 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

did the baggers have that overlapping letters logo before we did?

 

3 hours ago, BringBackTheDemon said:

A quick google search and I dont think we pre date the Yankees using the overlapping initials at all, the Yankees first used it in 1909. Happy to be corrected. 

 

2 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

Carlton also introduced the “CFC” initials logo to their jumper in 1909 (was used prior to this, just not on their jumper). I found evidence of us using the MFC initials in 1897. But I do acknowledge that the style of logo is synonymous with the New York teams mentioned. I just think it looks good on our merchandise, and branding is super important.

 

6 minutes ago, BringBackTheDemon said:

Can you link me to where you found us using it in 1897 please? I struggled to find any early emblems for us, interested to see the old ones. 

@Supermercado may be able to shed some light on this!

On 01/03/2025 at 07:29, Roger Mellie said:

image.png.d7fd2d3b904b4c4c0bded472beac70a4.png

♥️

I reckon this looks great but unfortunately every time I look at it it also makes me think of Carlton…..this is not good☹️


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 124 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 52 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 354 replies
    Demonland
  • VOTES: Hawthorn

    After 3 fantastic week Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award from Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler and Ed Langdon who round out the Top Five. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 34 replies
    Demonland