Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
1 hour ago, Ghostwriter said:

Not to put too fine a point on it but Fritta said Dusty was referring to Disco 🤷‍♀️ 

Perhaps he was referring to both. Whichever way it is it’s comforting to think I mightn’t have known. 😀

I think it makes sense and is something we’ve toyed with previously but I suggest it largely depends on other wing options as well so at very least it’s a good sign those options we all know of appear to be looking good!

 
26 minutes ago, Tolstoys Nudge said:

I think it makes sense and is something we’ve toyed with previously but I suggest it largely depends on other wing options as well so at very least it’s a good sign those options we all know of appear to be looking good!

And even if they were not looking good, as you say, I'm pleased that we at least seem to be trying various options rather than continuing with the "same old" plans.

ANB played an important role in recent years, particularly covering for Petracca in defensive transition. I would like to see Langdon play this role this year, which is a 50% mid and 50% high half forward role.

I don't really see the benefit of playing Langdon as a centre bounce midfielder. Gawn, Kossie and Petracca should be in most centre bounces IMO and that leaves only one spot for Viney, Oliver, Rivers, Langford and Sparrow.


Keen to see how it goes. 

Don't really care as long as Ed gets to run his 50km per game

No. This is Frawley as a forward-levels of stupid. Just play players where they're best suited. It's not hard.

8 hours ago, Chook said:

No. This is Frawley as a forward-levels of stupid. Just play players where they're best suited. It's not hard.

It's odd, not going to lie. 

You have a guy that hardly ever comes off the ground, unless he's still able to do this on the inside then I can't help but feel a key strength is taken away.

 
8 hours ago, Chook said:

No. This is Frawley as a forward-levels of stupid. Just play players where they're best suited. It's not hard.

Disagree. Ed can run all day. As a mid alongside Rivers he could well inject some serious run into a sometimes stagnant midfield. We also have Bowey, Spargo, Windsor, Billing’s, Sparrow, Laurie and Lindsay who can cover and possibly excel on his wing. Just because we’re exploring it and may experiment with it doesn’t mean we have to persist if it fails. 

1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

Disagree. Ed can run all day. As a mid alongside Rivers he could well inject some serious run into a sometimes stagnant midfield. We also have Bowey, Spargo, Windsor, Billing’s, Sparrow, Laurie and Lindsay who can cover and possibly excel on his wing. Just because we’re exploring it and may experiment with it doesn’t mean we have to persist if it fails. 

its part of the Churn tactic I have proposed for years. Hope the coaches have caught on. 

AND

really hope it works.


1 minute ago, dpositive said:

its part of the Churn tactic I have proposed for years. Hope the coaches have caught on. 

AND

really hope it works.

Are you saying that if Langdon’s proposed move doesn’t work it’s your fault?

2 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

Are you saying that if Langdon’s proposed move doesn’t work it’s your fault?

AUAUGH!!!!

Can I claim plausible deniability???????

3 hours ago, layzie said:

It's odd, not going to lie. 

You have a guy that hardly ever comes off the ground, unless he's still able to do this on the inside then I can't help but feel a key strength is taken away.

I think Langdon was far more effective playing 90% game time than 100%. Really felt like the cost outweighed the benefit on that one. He should still be able to play 90% in any combination of mid/wing/forward.

The other factor is our forwards should include Chandler (had a nice taste at the end of the year on the wing rotation), Sharp, Tracc, Pickett, Langford, hopefully Kolt. All guys who can take various roles on ball or the wing. 

Whether we go 3 talls and Fritsch or 2 talls we should be able to have enough rotations.

2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

I think Langdon was far more effective playing 90% game time than 100%. Really felt like the cost outweighed the benefit on that one. He should still be able to play 90% in any combination of mid/wing/forward.

The other factor is our forwards should include Chandler (had a nice taste at the end of the year on the wing rotation), Sharp, Tracc, Pickett, Langford, hopefully Kolt. All guys who can take various roles on ball or the wing. 

Whether we go 3 talls and Fritsch or 2 talls we should be able to have enough rotations.

Really probably your best mid forward and second best forward liable to kick goals and you would waste him on a wing!! 

That’s  what I call stupid plus dumb plus match losing!!

Now really give Trac something to complain about !!! 

On 10/02/2025 at 10:56, greenwaves said:

He'll play wing.  He might go inside occasionally but that's about it.  

I don't read replies or reactions 

I don’t read your posts

- er, except this one.

 


On 10/02/2025 at 19:21, Demonstone said:

Dusty was referring to Disco Turner wasn't he?

 

On 11/02/2025 at 08:09, Ghostwriter said:

Not to put too fine a point on it but Fritta said Dusty was referring to Disco 🤷‍♀️ 

I thought he was referring to George Gawn

16 hours ago, Chook said:

No. This is Frawley as a forward-levels of stupid. Just play players where they're best suited. It's not hard.

But how do we know where he's best suited if we don't try this? Imagine if he's best suited to being a true midfielder and we've missed out on this for years!

We have a lot of players with serious running power now. Ed played well as a HF last year, the only problem was that we had to rely on someone NQR like Sparrow to take the wing role in his place. Now we have good winger options to free up Ed. I'm here for it. 

The run, pressure, link and work rate will be very handy. 

31 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

We have a lot of players with serious running power now. Ed played well as a HF last year, the only problem was that we had to rely on someone NQR like Sparrow to take the wing role in his place. Now we have good winger options to free up Ed. I'm here for it. 

The run, pressure, link and work rate will be very handy. 

I'm not sure Billings, Lindsay, Woey and Sharp are good wing options. If 2 of them can get close to league average that will be a good result. We're just going to be prepared with being just ok on the wing to be better in other spots.

4 hours ago, 58er said:

Really probably your best mid forward and second best forward liable to kick goals and you would waste him on a wing!! 

That’s  what I call stupid plus dumb plus match losing!!

Now really give Trac something to complain about !!! 

"All guys who can take various roles on ball or the wing."


4 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

I'm not sure Billings, Lindsay, Woey and Sharp are good wing options. If 2 of them can get close to league average that will be a good result. We're just going to be prepared with being just ok on the wing to be better in other spots.

What's your metric ?

What's the league ''average'' ?

On 10/02/2025 at 16:03, roy11 said:

adds an additional layer of flexibility too if players can play (and know what to do) in multiple roles. 

 

Agreed. I would maybe throw langdon on ball when everyone else is getting tired say the last 5 minutes of the 3rd and 4th quarters or periods of play of free flowing end to end football . 

16 minutes ago, Gator said:

What's your metric ?

What's the league ''average'' ?

I really mean get a game each week and play a role.

If you want a numbers metric then not many midfielders played week in/week out for decent sides and had an AFL rating <8 (or Windsor's 7.94). Some of that is because they're often the sub but even adjusting for that it's probably true. Windsor was the 105th best mid in the comp last year, or just better than 6th best per side. 2 wingers establishing themselves in the side and achieving a rating >8 would be a good result. Anyone going better than 7.5 would probably do the job and let us leave Windsor and Langdon to different roles.

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_stats.html?comp=afl&season=2024

He has different traits but Lindsay will do very well to match Windsor's output given a slower start to his preseason. I'm not convinced by Woey. Sharp has a little bit of something but I like him better at half forward. I'm not willing to buy the Billings hype, although he's kind of the perfect candidate to hold down a spot at an acceptable level.

 
2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

I really mean get a game each week and play a role.

If you want a numbers metric then not many midfielders played week in/week out for decent sides and had an AFL rating <8 (or Windsor's 7.94). Some of that is because they're often the sub but even adjusting for that it's probably true. Windsor was the 105th best mid in the comp last year, or just better than 6th best per side. 2 wingers establishing themselves in the side and achieving a rating >8 would be a good result. Anyone going better than 7.5 would probably do the job and let us leave Windsor and Langdon to different roles.

https://www.wheeloratings.com/afl_stats.html?comp=afl&season=2024

He has different traits but Lindsay will do very well to match Windsor's output given a slower start to his preseason. I'm not convinced by Woey. Sharp has a little bit of something but I like him better at half forward. I'm not willing to buy the Billings hype, although he's kind of the perfect candidate to hold down a spot at an acceptable level.

I was hoping you'd have ''league average'' wing statistics to make the declaration you did, but seemingly not.

12 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

"All guys who can take various roles on ball or the wing."

That’s what I am saying why the wing for Trac. Don’t write a statement that is open if you don’t wish to be questioned?

Say except for Trac if you mean it. 

What a waste of a player in any case I agree with the others but not Trac.!! 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • FEATURE: 1925

    A hundred years ago today, on 2 May 1925, Melbourne kicked off the new season with a 47 point victory over St Kilda to take top place on the VFL ladder after the opening round of the new season.  Top place was a relatively unknown position for the team then known as the “Fuchsias.” They had finished last in 1923 and rose by only one place in the following year although the final home and away round heralded a promise of things to come when they surprised the eventual premiers Essendon. That victory set the stage for more improvement and it came rapidly. In this series, I will tell the story of how the 1925 season unfolded for the Melbourne Football Club and how it made the VFL finals for the first time in a decade on the way to the ultimate triumph a year later.

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: West Coast

    Saturday’s election night game in Perth between the West Coast Eagles and Melbourne represents 18th vs 15th which makes it a tough decision as to which party to favour. The Eagles have yet to break the ice under their new coach in Andrew McQualter who is the second understudy in a row to confront Demon Coach Simon Goodwin who was also winless until a fortnight ago. On that basis, many punters might be considering to go with the donkey vote but I’ve been assigned with the task of helping readers to come to a considered opinion on this matter of vital importance across the nation. It was almost a year ago that I wrote a preview here of the Demons’ away game against the Eagles (under the name William from Waalitj because it was Indigenous Round).  I issued a warning that it was a danger game, based on my local knowledge that the home team were no longer easybeats and that they possessed a wunderkind generational player in Harley Reid who was capable of producing stellar performances playing among men a decade and more older than he.  At the time, the Eagles already had two wins off the back of a couple of the young man’s masterclasses and they had recently given the Bombers a scare straight after their Anzac Day blockbuster draw against the then reigning premiers.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 08

    Round 08 of the 2025 AFL Season kicks off on Thursday with a must-win game for the Bombers to stay in touch with the top eight, while the struggling Roos seek a morale-boosting upset. Friday sees the Saints desperate for a win as well if they are to stay in finals contention and their opponents the Dockers will be eager to crack in to the Top 8 with a win on the road. Saturday kicks off with a pivotal clash for both sides asthe Bulldogs look to solidify their top-eight spot, while Port seeks to shake their pretender tag. Then the Crows will be looking to steady their topsy turvy season against a resurgent Blues looking to make it 4 wins on the trot. On Election Night a Blockbuster will see the ladder-leading Pies take on the Cats, who are keen to bounce back after a narrow loss. On Sunday the Sydney Derby promises fireworks as the Giants aim to cement their top-eight status, while the Swans fight to keep their season alive. The Hawks, celebrating their centenary, will be looking to easily account for the Tigers who are desperate to halt their slide. The Round concludes on Sunday Night with a top end of the table QClash with significant ladder implications; both Queensland teams are in scintillating form. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons?

    • 148 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 563 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Richmond

    The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Richmond

    The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland