Jump to content

Featured Replies

Forgive me for not trawling through 20 pages to see what options have been discussed already.

I have been steadfast on keeping both 5 and 9, but I'm now more open to a trade for 9.ย  The more I see and read, the more I realise how deep this draft is. There will be a LOT of talent in the teens that would be top 10's in most other years.

Below would be my reaction should we swap 9 for those picks in bold.ย The italic bold being a counter offer 2nd pick offer. Keep in mind, the Richmond pick 24 will be the first pick of the 2nd round. Highly prized and easily traded for a '25 first rounder should we so desire.

I had been trying to work out how we could get a pick in the 20's as I really like a player rarely discussed. I know I will get howled down by most for suggesting a ruckman, but I feel Alex Dodson is something special.ย  He is the u18 AA ruck, 203cm, and regularly gets 20+ disposals per game. Also a top level basketballer, he is really an extra midfielder and has a very high footy IQ. With 3 years under Max, I would be shocked if he doesnt become the best ruck in the league

Greater Western Sydney:ย 15, 16, 21?, 37, 56, 74ย  ย ๐Ÿ˜ƒย ๐Ÿ™‚
Richmond:ย 1, 6, 10, 11, 18, 20, 23, 24?ย ย ๐Ÿ™‚ย ๐Ÿ˜‰
Sydney:ย 19, 22, 44, 59ย ย ๐Ÿ˜
West Coast:ย 12, 26, 73ย ๐Ÿ™‚
Western Bulldogs:ย 17, 25, 35, 48ย ๐Ÿ˜

I have put on my helmet and about to jump in my fox hole. Fire away!

Breaking news:ย  Just did a topic search and saw old55 started an Alex Dodson thread on 5 October!ย  Good to know I may have a bunker buddy.ย ๐Ÿ˜

Edited by Palace Dees
additional info

ย 
On 23/10/2024 at 17:16, spirit of norm smith said:

Whatโ€™s the DL senate view on drafting Bo Allan?


ย 

My guess is the club donโ€™t really care where he is from BUT I do this time aroundโ€ฆ drafting interstaters in recent years hasnโ€™t concerned me but there is just too much other stuff going on now at the club to take the risk, especially when there are so many good vics around that mark in the draftย 

On 23/10/2024 at 17:16, spirit of norm smith said:

Whatโ€™s the DL senate view on drafting Bo Allan?
He looks a very strong midfielder with good strong contested footy in centre clearance and stoppages. Tackles extremely well. ย Good long left foot kick. ย Whilst didnโ€™t always hit targets, he played above his years and under pressure. ย His pace is good. His body size 190cms and shape is a plug and play in todayโ€™s AFL World. ย Because MFCSS, only knock is the WA go home factor. ย Iโ€™m still perhaps scarred by Jackson. ย Thankful and hopeful that we can retain Kozzy, Riv, JVR, McVee & Kolt. JT shouldnโ€™t be afraid of Allanโ€™s WA origins. ย 

He looks a gun in every part of his game except his kicking, which looks genuinely shocking at timesย 

If you could fix that he could be an absolute steal, but after the past few years I think a lot of Dees fans are nervous about taking any player who isnโ€™t at least a competent kickโ€ฆ

Edited by demoncat

 

Is taj hotton a possibility with this pick?ย 
what are peoples thoughts on him.

ย 

have herd he dominated some games before injury , 4 goals 30+ possessions.

ย 

could he be a wizard Watson type player with instant impact after regaining fitness ?

16 minutes ago, Melonmonster said:

Is taj hotton a possibility with this pick?ย 
what are peoples thoughts on him.

ย 

have herd he dominated some games before injury , 4 goals 30+ possessions.

ย 

could he be a wizard Watson type player with instant impact after regaining fitness ?

If we are going for Armstrong at 5 I don't think we take the risk here. Very exciting player though.


27 minutes ago, Nascent said:

If we are going for Armstrong at 5 I don't think we take the risk here. Very exciting player though.

Are you starting to believe we will take Armstrong at 5? Is this due to some of the media links is to him? I thought those links were just people assuming weโ€™d take him as we have had forward issues.ย 

Iโ€™d be surprised if we did take Armstrong at 5 but in recent years the player we are linked too in the lead up to the draft is normally the one we take.ย 

  • Author
20 minutes ago, Colm said:

Iโ€™d be surprised if we did take Armstrong at 5 but in recent years the player we are linked too in the lead up to the draft is normally the one we take.ย 

Still guess work this far out imo

ย 
1 minute ago, 2021 said:

For whatever reason, we were linked to Jefferson from day one.

This is what worries me ๐Ÿ˜‚

Surely ย we are not taking Armstrong with the talented kids available .ย 


41 minutes ago, Colm said:

Iโ€™d be surprised if we did take Armstrong at 5 but in recent years the player we are linked too in the lead up to the draft is normally the one we take.ย 

It's all guesswork to be honest.

We're exactly one month away from the draft and there is no way we'd have a player locked in. We'd have a list of about 6-10 names we'd be interested I with pick 5,and then probably another 10-12 names around the mark for pick 9.

Even 24 hour prior to the draft clubs will have last minute change of mind on players as well.

I am sure we have interest in Armstrong, but there would be 10 other names we'd be interested in as well.

47 minutes ago, Colm said:

Are you starting to believe we will take Armstrong at 5? Is this due to some of the media links is to him? I thought those links were just people assuming weโ€™d take him as we have had forward issues.ย 

Too early to say, just putting out hypotheticals based on recent speculation but not placing too much stock in it at this stage.

9 minutes ago, Melonmonster said:

This is what worries me ๐Ÿ˜‚

Surely ย we are not taking Armstrong with the talented kids available .ย 

It's not like we'd be saying no to talented kids and chasing a 35 year old from the Managatang thirds.

I get the concerns both in terms of list build and doubts on his game but there's a lot to like in Armstrong and if Langford, Lalor and FOS are gone there's plenty of doubt over what's left.

Plus we get one of them with 9 as well.

1 hour ago, Colm said:

Are you starting to believe we will take Armstrong at 5? Is this due to some of the media links is to him? I thought those links were just people assuming weโ€™d take him as we have had forward issues.ย 

It must be media links. I watched a video on the AFL website the other day where Cal Twomey answered a submitted question about who we might take with 5 and 9, and he was a bit vague with his answer. I think he just listed a bunch of midfielders in that top 5 or 6 group. Cal is someone who tends to have his finger on the pulse, so I'd say it's probably still fairly open.

I would be comfortable taking Armstrong at this pick, but definitely not at 5!

We need a premium level mid for that pick.


On 23/10/2024 at 17:16, spirit of norm smith said:

Whatโ€™s the DL senate view on drafting Bo Allan?
He looks a very strong midfielder with good strong contested footy in centre clearance and stoppages. Tackles extremely well. ย Good long left foot kick. ย Whilst didnโ€™t always hit targets, he played above his years and under pressure. ย His pace is good. His body size 190cms and shape is a plug and play in todayโ€™s AFL World. ย Because MFCSS, only knock is the WA go home factor. ย Iโ€™m still perhaps scarred by Jackson. ย Thankful and hopeful that we can retain Kozzy, Riv, JVR, McVee & Kolt. JT shouldnโ€™t be afraid of Allanโ€™s WA origins. ย 

I really like Allan which personally I rate him higher than Smilie and about the same as Langford. To me heโ€™s a got an incredibly well rounded profile with a sky high ceiling, he tested top 5 for standing & running vertical jump and top 5 for agility, he ran a sub 3 seconds 20m sprint and a 6:20 2km time trial, all at 191cm and a strong frame. Most importantly all that athleticism shows up on field with his fierce competitiveness and appetite for the contest makes him really good defensively in the midfield or down back, certainly leaps and bounds better defensively than Smilie & Langford. He plays with more of a presence than those other 2 but they at this stage certainly have him beat for skills but I think thereโ€™s a lot of scope for him to also make that a strength as heโ€™s got a huge leg can kick the ball probably almost 60m and has flashed good decision making lowering his eyes when he needs to itโ€™s just more about executing those short kicks he needs to get better at. To me reminds me a lot of Elliot Yeo with his power and versatility, Iโ€™d be very happy if we got him at 9.

2 hours ago, demoncat said:

He looks a gun in every part of his game except his kicking, which looks genuinely shocking at timesย 

If you could fix that he could be an absolute steal, but after the past few years I think a lot of Dees fans are nervous about taking any player who isnโ€™t at least a competent kickโ€ฆ

It's not so much kicking as decision making. He has a nice enough punchy short left foot kick as well as the ability to roost it, but he makes bad choices by hand and doesn't see options by foot too.ย 

I certainly feel like it's time to sacrifice some athleticism and ball winning for quality decision makers.

Maybe not if he was Tracc/Oliver level contested beast. But he's not that either.

3 hours ago, demoncat said:

He looks a gun in every part of his game except his kicking, which looks genuinely shocking at timesย 

If you could fix that he could be an absolute steal, but after the past few years I think a lot of Dees fans are nervous about taking any player who isnโ€™t at least a competent kickโ€ฆ

ย 

18 minutes ago, Gawndog98 said:

I really like Allan which personally I rate him higher than Smilie and about the same as Langford. To me heโ€™s a got an incredibly well rounded profile with a sky high ceiling, he tested top 5 for standing & running vertical jump and top 5 for agility, he ran a sub 3 seconds 20m sprint and a 6:20 2km time trial, all at 191cm and a strong frame. Most importantly all that athleticism shows up on field with his fierce competitiveness and appetite for the contest makes him really good defensively in the midfield or down back, certainly leaps and bounds better defensively than Smilie & Langford. He plays with more of a presence than those other 2 but they at this stage certainly have him beat for skills but I think thereโ€™s a lot of scope for him to also make that a strength as heโ€™s got a huge leg can kick the ball probably almost 60m and has flashed good decision making lowering his eyes when he needs to itโ€™s just more about executing those short kicks he needs to get better at. To me reminds me a lot of Elliot Yeo with his power and versatility, Iโ€™d be very happy if we got him at 9.

It wouldnโ€™t surprise if we picked Bo Allan at 9. ย Heโ€™s got lots of very good AFL qualities. ย 
It would certainly cause an outcry by the Eagles fans who all think they perfectly traded out โ€œ3โ€ to get Baker and then steal Allan back at โ€œ12โ€ . If heโ€™s gone, there is no other home grown talent out of the West at this level. ย 

i think given the likelihood 5 is a mid, for mine langford i would be taking a different type at 9. so travaglia is my target and maybe a bid on lombard as they fit needs and are high quality players, targetting needs with late picks is good however theyre also less likely to succeed so taking a high end needs based player can fix a hole for a decade. hence travaglia. i believe he'd be playing regularly by the byes and would move ahead of quite a few similar types almost immediately.ย 

given the loss of ANB is somewhat covered by sharp whilst lombard bid will almost certainly be matched, if they surprised everyone and let him through i wouldnt be upset either.ย 

if we go tauru at 5 (i predict the roos at 6 for him) then bo allen would make sense at 9

On 23/10/2024 at 17:16, spirit of norm smith said:

Whatโ€™s the DL senate view on drafting Bo Allan?
He looks a very strong midfielder with good strong contested footy in centre clearance and stoppages. Tackles extremely well. ย Good long left foot kick. ย Whilst didnโ€™t always hit targets, he played above his years and under pressure. ย His pace is good. His body size 190cms and shape is a plug and play in todayโ€™s AFL World. ย Because MFCSS, only knock is the WA go home factor. ย Iโ€™m still perhaps scarred by Jackson. ย Thankful and hopeful that we can retain Kozzy, Riv, JVR, McVee & Kolt. JT shouldnโ€™t be afraid of Allanโ€™s WA origins. ย 

ย 

On 25/10/2024 at 09:45, demoncat said:

He looks a gun in every part of his game except his kicking, which looks genuinely shocking at timesย 

If you could fix that he could be an absolute steal, but after the past few years I think a lot of Dees fans are nervous about taking any player who isnโ€™t at least a competent kickโ€ฆ

I wouldn't be at all opposed to taking him at pick 9. I imagine in the interviews we've already had with him during the combine that there would be a fair amount of querying his intentions as to whether he is open to living and playing on the other side of the country. Of course you might not get a definitive answer but if there were any doubts from him or he even mentioned wanting to play back home one day you would simply take him off the board. I know the Jackson history scares people but we've had some success as SONS mentions with Rivers, McVee, JVR etc signing on and looking like long term dees.

His kicking isn't as poor as what his main youtube highlights portray. In the heat of the WAFL finals he played in he definitely made some mistakes by foot. I would encourage other Demon landers not to judge on short highlight clips in this regard and look at draft profile reports as well. From all accounts of friends of mine in Perth who have seen him live at games, he is actually a good user with his kicking. Reports are mainly that he needs to work on his decision making which will come in time.ย 

He's going to be a gun. Start him down back and build him up over time with midfield bursts where he'll wreak havoc.

Edited by Young Blood


The last few years we've tried trading up. For Watson last year (I think). Humphries year before.

Really wouldn't surprise if we go for Norths pick 2.

15 minutes ago, kurtneverdied said:

The last few years we've tried trading up. For Watson last year (I think). Humphries year before.

Really wouldn't surprise if we go for Norths pick 2.

Iโ€™m comfortable sitting on 5 & 9 thanks very much. We will get two future โ€œacesโ€ย 
All In Reaction GIF by Travis

On 23/10/2024 at 08:48, spirit of norm smith said:

Hereโ€™s my top groupย 

1. Richmond. Sam Lalor.ย 

**Matched bid**Lions. Levi Ashcroft.ย 

2. North Melbourne. Alix Tauru
3. Carltonย (via West Coast). Finn Oโ€™Sullivanย 
4. Adelaide. Sid Draper
5. Melbourneย . Harvey Langford
6. Richmondย (via Gold Coast). Jagga Smith

**matched bid**Suns. Leonardo Lombardย 

7. St Kilda. Josh Smillie
8. St Kildaย (via Josh Battle compensation pick). Harry Armstrongย 
9. Melbourneย (via Essendon). Xavier Lindsay ย 
10. Richmondย (via Fremantle) Luke Trainor
11. Richmondย (via Fremantle,ย Collingwood) ย Tobie Travaglia
12. West Coastย (via Carlton) Bo Allanย 

**matched bid**ย Ess. Isaac Kako

13. Port Adelaideย (via Gold Coast,ย Western Bulldogs). Joe Berry
14. Fremantleย (via Richmond,ย Hawthorn, Carlton).ย ย Taj Hotton.ย 
15. Greater Western Sydney. Jobe Shanahanย 
16. Greater Western Sydneyย (via Harry Perryman compensation pick). Murphy Reid.ย 
17. Western Bulldogsย (via Geelong). Cooper Hynesย 

**matched bid** ย Lions. Sam Marshallย 

18. Richmondย (via Fremantle,ย Port Adelaide). Jack Whitlock.ย 

**matched bid** Blues. Ben Camporeale

19. Sydney. Harrison Oliver
20. Richmondย (via Brisbane). Alex Dodson

ย 

Fair enough that looks better but I think we need either Tauru or Armstrong in our 5 or 9 selections.ย 

83 might surprise ( if we have it this year) and a good mid is easier to find in subsequent drafts. Yes a great one like Clarry Trac or Gus or Jack is greater I now but an X factor CHF or CHB is a win win IMO.ย 

ย 
On 23/10/2024 at 08:50, adonski said:

I don't think you trade into a draft to take a kid with a busted knee

Joel Selwood says ย Hi !!ย 

  • Author
5 minutes ago, 58er said:

Joel Selwood says ย Hi !!ย 

Give him my regards


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

    • 36 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Mondayโ€™s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from eitherโ€™s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demonsโ€™ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last yearโ€™s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Clubโ€™s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.ย Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Letโ€™s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the teamโ€™s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and โ€ฆ it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterdayโ€™s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourneโ€™s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldnโ€™t get any worse. Well, it did. And whatโ€™s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasnโ€™t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyonโ€™s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourneโ€™s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourneโ€™s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterdayโ€™s 7 goals 21 behinds.ย 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. Iโ€™ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?ย Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?ย 

    • 4 replies