Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Good to see the likes of Jacob Van Rooyen, Jake Bowey, Bailey Laurie and Blake Howes in the USA doing some intensive training over there in the off season.

I see Jake Lever being the leader that he is has joined the group which is a exactly what you want from your leaders showing the way.

Would be good to seeing JVR, Bowey and Howes take the next step next year with Laurie at least finally showing his worth.

 
7 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Good to see the likes of Jacob Van Rooyen, Jake Bowey, Bailey Laurie and Blake Howes in the USA doing some intensive training over there in the off season.

I see Jake Lever being the leader that he is has joined the group which is a exactly what you want from your leaders showing the way.

Would be good to see the likes of JVR, Bowey and Howes take the next step next year with Laurie at least finally showing his worth.

I was really hoping to see oliver join one of these training camps.

9 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

I was really hoping to see oliver join one of these training camps.

He’s probably going to do his altitude training in the You Yangs

 
5 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

He’s probably going to do his altitude training in the You Yangs

Well I guess that's higher than the MCG

9 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

He’s probably going to do his altitude training in the You Yangs

😄

But, geographically and to the ear, that still shouts 'yeah, nah, undecided'.

Mount Duneed on the other hand...


Dusty Martin achieved great results by doing his off-season training with Dane Swan in the US. 😁

  • Whispering_Jack changed the title to Young players training in the USA

It's the way to go these days. Players get access to facilities you could only dream of here. 

25 minutes ago, layzie said:

It's the way to go these days. Players get access to facilities you could only dream of here. 

Better than Casey Fields? Surely not!!!!

 
7 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Better than Casey Fields? Surely not!!!!

Way better than Caulfield unless you are a horse!

18 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Better than Casey Fields? Surely not!!!!

Well smart a..e it is a bit further than Casey or Goschs and costs a bit more also.

PS Have you ever seen the setup inside at Casey Fields? 

Or just marvelled at the extraordinary grass surface on the oval? 

Never forget that’s where our AFL VFL and AFLW premiership heroes trained for their flags. Used as the main ground. 


4 minutes ago, 58er said:

Well smart a..e it is a bit further than Casey or Goschs and costs a bit more also.

PS Have you ever seen the setup inside at Casey Fields? 

Or just marvelled at the extraordinary grass surface on the oval? 

Never forget that’s where our AFL VFL and AFLW premiership heroes trained for their flags. Used as the main ground. 

I think it was a joke 58er! Yes it has good facilities distance is the only problem. 

  • Author
5 minutes ago, 58er said:

Well smart a..e it is a bit further than Casey or Goschs and costs a bit more also.

PS Have you ever seen the setup inside at Casey Fields? 

Or just marvelled at the extraordinary grass surface on the oval? 

Never forget that’s where our AFL VFL and AFLW premiership heroes trained for their flags. Used as the main ground. 

And yet the players hate travelling out there.

The sooner we get Caufield up and going through quicker we can ditch Casey fields for good.

Edited by dazzledavey36

1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

And yet the players hate travelling out there.

The sooner we get Caufield up and going through quicker we can ditch Casey fields for good.

Don't hold your breath dd. It is not even approved yet and a new set of board members have moved in. They are not as happy with having a football team there as previous members. Next decade at the earliest. 

2 hours ago, mo64 said:

Dusty Martin achieved great results by doing his off-season training with Dane Swan in the US. 😁

Similarly, Brisbane won a premiership on the back of a pre-season at Vegas.

*Dips toes hesitantly into mire...*

Couple of things in your posts, @dazzledavey36 and @old dee:

Where do we find the players' views on travelling to Casey? (I'm not on any social media except here. And that's more than enough 😉)

Where, achievable earlier, do the new set of board members want the football team to be?

(And maybe I should have put this on another thread. Sorry to divert a positive story.)

Edited by Timothy Reddan-A'Blew


13 minutes ago, old dee said:

I think it was a joke 58er! Yes it has good facilities distance is the only problem. 

Thanks OD yes I understand but it is sarcasm and some of it does not amuse me when it reflects IMO unfairly or negatively on the Club.

Good on those boys and Jake also. Not doing his claims for next Captain any harm at all. 

5 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

*Dips toes hesitantly into mire...*

Couple of things in your posts, @dazzledavey36 and @old dee:

Where do we find the players' views on travelling to Casey? (I'm not on any social media except here. And that's more than enough 😉)

Where, achievable earlier, do the new set of board members want the football team to be?

(And maybe I should have put this on another thread. Sorry to divert a positive story.)

How do we know the two new recent members views on all things Melbourne? 

I imagine like most of us that the proposed new Caulfield base can be implemented as along with the stage/s outlined recently by the CEO that are to be approved. 

That’s  because they haven’t had to declare anything when you are co-opted to the Board. 

Just like Councilors Pollies at times and Cttee/Board members  being co-opted should not happen as an automatic decision without a “bye election”. 

 

25 minutes ago, old dee said:

Don't hold your breath dd. It is not even approved yet and a new set of board members have moved in. They are not as happy with having a football team there as previous members. Next decade at the earliest. 

Wow. If not caulfield than where? Surely these new board members realise a reasonable solution is better than no solution...

34 minutes ago, old dee said:

Don't hold your breath dd. It is not even approved yet and a new set of board members have moved in. They are not as happy with having a football team there as previous members. Next decade at the earliest. 

 

7 minutes ago, Gouga said:

Wow. If not caulfield than where? Surely these new board members realise a reasonable solution is better than no solution...

I read it as Old Dee referring to the new members of the Caufield/racing board not the MFC.

21 minutes ago, Left Foot Snap said:

 

I read it as Old Dee referring to the new members of the Caufield/racing board not the MFC.

Got it. Makes sense. 


1 hour ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

*Dips toes hesitantly into mire...*

Couple of things in your posts, @dazzledavey36 and @old dee:

Where do we find the players' views on travelling to Casey? (I'm not on any social media except here. And that's more than enough 😉)

Where, achievable earlier, do the new set of board members want the football team to be?

(And maybe I should have put this on another thread. Sorry to divert a positive story.)

Good question I have no idea. 

5 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Good to see the likes of Jacob Van Rooyen, Jake Bowey, Bailey Laurie and Blake Howes in the USA doing some intensive training over there in the off season.

I see Jake Lever being the leader that he is has joined the group which is a exactly what you want from your leaders showing the way.

Would be good to seeing JVR, Bowey and Howes take the next step next year with Laurie at least finally showing his worth.

Love Jake Lever. 👏👏

1 hour ago, Gouga said:

Wow. If not caulfield than where? Surely these new board members realise a reasonable solution is better than no solution...

Who knows Gouga. I just got the feeling it is not guaranteed from recent events of changes at the racing club.

 
1 hour ago, Left Foot Snap said:

 

I read it as Old Dee referring to the new members of the Caufield/racing board not the MFC.

Spot on sorry if there was confusion. 

2 hours ago, Gouga said:

Wow. If not caulfield than where? Surely these new board members realise a reasonable solution is better than no solution...

It’s OK Gough it is all hearsay let’s wait and see what happens.😁


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Like
    • 70 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies