Jump to content

Wildcard Weekend

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

 

At the end of the day it's us who are the idiotic morons in their eyes for not instantly accepting things like these and getting on board. 

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

    There's already a buck in letting 9th and 10th play 2 extra finals games. The logistics of selling off a final when you don't know who's playing seems way too impractical, so much so that it would be hard to get a great price anyway.

    Imagine if it was Collingwood - Essendon and you're giving up 100k at the G to have 50k scramble to Adelaide, many of whom would just drive given it's last minute.

    And what if the other game was GWS - Gold Coast in Perth and you'd have a grand total of 3 men and a dog travelling over for it.

    fans travelling to go to the game is almost completely irrelevant 

    also, those falling in the likely 7-10 spots should know that they'll be heading for a destination location to play their elimination 'wildcard' game, so if they desperately 100% want to get there, they can

    it's all about broadcast revenue and gambling $$s

    as always

  • Quote
    •  
    17 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

    Let’s just make the season 12 months long. We need games daily, we need more special rounds, I want a clown round where everyone has to play in clown shoes. 
    What could go wrong? It’s not like we have the highest number of injuries on record or anything… 🙄

    Ironically I think making the season much longer could have a good outcome for the game.

    - Shorter preseason means players can't be "as fit" in round one. It means overall fitness levels might plateau closer to what is sustainable year round and get rid of the assymetrical "loading" and fitness issues that plague June and July.

    - Lower fitness probably means more one on one and less gut running zone, which seems to be a preferred feature for many viewers

    - More games means more equitable fixture, playing everyone home and away

    - Need for larger squads to manage fitness, injuries, etc. means that there is more depth kept on AFL lists (instead of using the list mostly for development).

    - Longer season might even see a reduced reluctance to rest players when injured.

     

    I can see a good case for this. Not saying it isn't without its issues, I haven't actually thought this through. But I think it's worth considering if they can secure the grounds.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • 2 weeks later...

    Collingwood 10th V Melbourne 12th heading into round 24.

    Winner likely finishes 10th.

    Next year that would get you a spot in the wild card. That would’ve meant our win over Gold Coast last week would’ve had massive ramifications under the wild card model.

    A disastrous season actually could’ve turned into September action.

    Everyone still dead against the wild card?

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1

    22 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Collingwood 10th V Melbourne 12th heading into round 24.

    Winner likely finishes 10th.

    Next year that would get you a spot in the wild card. That would’ve meant our win over Gold Coast last week would’ve had massive ramifications under the wild card model.

    A disastrous season actually could’ve turned into September action.

    Everyone still dead against the wild card?

    Yes. 

    I hate that we’re in the bottom half of the competition after 22 games and yet would, if there was a wildcard round, still get a chance to play finals. 

    Talk about rewarding mediocrity. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Clap 1
    31 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Collingwood 10th V Melbourne 12th heading into round 24.

    Winner likely finishes 10th.

    Next year that would get you a spot in the wild card. That would’ve meant our win over Gold Coast last week would’ve had massive ramifications under the wild card model.

    A disastrous season actually could’ve turned into September action.

    Everyone still dead against the wild card?

    Absolutely against the whole idea. 
    we were not good enough or consistent enough in 2024. 
    rewarding mediocrity is just wrong…

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Clap 1
    1 minute ago, titan_uranus said:

    Yes. 

    I hate that we’re in the bottom half of the competition after 22 games and yet would, if there was a wildcard round, still get a chance to play finals. 

    Talk about rewarding mediocrity. 

    We’ll I’d imagine if the Wild Card was implemented this year, we’d definitely get back the 10,000 people that you were concerned about were not going to turn up this Friday, because it was a dead rubber.
     

  • Quote
    •  
    2 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

    Yes. 

    I hate that we’re in the bottom half of the competition after 22 games and yet would, if there was a wildcard round, still get a chance to play finals. 

    Talk about rewarding mediocrity. 

    1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

    Absolutely against the whole idea. 
    we were not good enough or consistent enough in 2024. 
    rewarding mediocrity is just wrong…

    Those who have reflected glass-half-full on our several games and close losses against teams firmly in not-mediocre ladder positions might dispute that we are mediocre?

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, Timothy Reddan-A'Blew said:

    Those who have reflected glass-half-full on our several games and close losses against teams firmly in not-mediocre ladder positions might dispute that we are mediocre?

    We haven’t won enough games to Reach the 8

    Deal with it and get better….

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Clap 1

    Giving a team finishing 10th, usually after losing more than half its games, even a theoretical chance to call itself the season's premiers is simply absurd.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Clap 2
    2 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Collingwood 10th V Melbourne 12th heading into round 24.

    Winner likely finishes 10th.

    Next year that would get you a spot in the wild card. That would’ve meant our win over Gold Coast last week would’ve had massive ramifications under the wild card model.

    A disastrous season actually could’ve turned into September action.

    Everyone still dead against the wild card?

    Yes it’s a shocking idea, but the AFL don’t care it’s all about money. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Angry 1

    Imagine if the Bulldogs in 2016 had to play in the wildcard round after finishing 7th. The giants last year

     

    it will ruin the first actual week of AFL finals

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    3 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Collingwood 10th V Melbourne 12th heading into round 24.

    Winner likely finishes 10th.

    Next year that would get you a spot in the wild card. That would’ve meant our win over Gold Coast last week would’ve had massive ramifications under the wild card model.

    A disastrous season actually could’ve turned into September action.

    Everyone still dead against the wild card?

    Yes.

    It's absolutely ridiculous, the aim is to win the flag. Doing that from outside the 4 is nigh on impossible (apart from the Dogs aberration) let alone winning from 9th or 10th.

    It's just more pointless money grabbing from the AFL, trying to find more ways to appease the broadcasters with more content, not giving a stuff about the supporters or the integrity of the competition. They are an absolute clown show.

    Wildcards make sense in the NFL because of the division structure. So you might have a division winner with a 7-10 or 8-9 record make playoffs while another division has 3 teams with records of 10-7 or better so it makes sense for the better teams in the stronger division to qualify for playoffs as "wildcards" despite not winning their division to qualify.

    The AFL does not have divisions or conferences, we have one ladder with the qualifying for finals being finishing in the top 8. After 22 (now 23) rounds if you haven't done enough to qualify for at least 8th spot then you aren't a serious threat for the flag are you?

    Edited by Dr. Gonzo

  • Quote
    • Thanks 2
    13 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    We’ll I’d imagine if the Wild Card was implemented this year, we’d definitely get back the 10,000 people that you were concerned about were not going to turn up this Friday, because it was a dead rubber.

    That’s twice you’ve run an “ends justify the means” argument. 

    I don’t agree. 

    We’d get bigger crowds with a whole host of bad or annoying ideas. That doesn’t stop them being bad or annoying. 

    At any rate, we will see crowds and viewership diminish if we keep playing more games. Scarcity is an important concept and one the AFL doesn’t appreciate.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Clap 1

    10 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    Yes.

    It's absolutely ridiculous, the aim is to win the flag. Doing that from outside the 4 is nigh on impossible (apart from the Dogs aberration) let alone winning from 9th or 10th.

    It's just more pointless money grabbing from the AFL, trying to find more ways to appease the broadcasters with more content, not giving a stuff about the supporters or the integrity of the competition. They are an absolute clown show.

    Wildcards make sense in the NFL because of the division structure. So you might have a division winner with a 7-10 or 8-9 record make playoffs while another division has 3 teams with records of 10-7 or better so it makes sense for the better teams in the stronger division to qualify for playoffs as "wildcards" despite not winning their division to qualify.

    The AFL does not have divisions or conferences, we have one ladder with the qualifying for finals being finishing in the top 8. After 22 (now 23) rounds if you haven't done enough to qualify for at least 8th spot then you aren't a serious threat for the flag are you?

    👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • Quote
    14 hours ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Collingwood 10th V Melbourne 12th heading into round 24.

    Winner likely finishes 10th.

    Next year that would get you a spot in the wild card. That would’ve meant our win over Gold Coast last week would’ve had massive ramifications under the wild card model.

    A disastrous season actually could’ve turned into September action.

    Everyone still dead against the wild card?

    Imagine using a dead rubber game to justify a stupid idea which only aims to generate more money, specially broadcasting money. 😮‍💨😮‍💨

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    It will happen and it will be fine. Fun even.

    8 teams from 18 teams playing finals leave mechanisms like the ‘wildcard weekend’ as useful to keep people interested in their team, and by extension, footy in general.

    Get upset about more important things.

  • Quote
    25 minutes ago, rpfc said:

    It will happen and it will be fine. Fun even.

    8 teams from 18 teams playing finals leave mechanisms like the ‘wildcard weekend’ as useful to keep people interested in their team, and by extension, footy in general.

    Get upset about more important things.

    You'll be happy when the league has two conferences and super wild car, just copy the yanks 🙄🙄

  • Quote
    • Vomit 1

    I'd support the wildcard if it reduced the length of the H&A season. A widcard weekend of 4 teams would at least save 3 otherwise meaningless games 

  • Quote

    I do find it odd that most posters are against it, and yet which club would get one of the most benefits out of it this year?

    Which club would still be in the hunt heading into this weekend?

    Which club's supporters would be genuinely pumped up about this week with the chance of still playing in September?

    Which club's supporters would've enjoyed the GC win with the knowledge that genuine finals implications were on the line, not just a late season 'feel good' dead rubber.

    I refuse to believe that passionate die hard posters against the wild card would thumb their nose at an opportunity of playing a stand alone round of football with the chance to play finals. I know the club and its sponsors would embrace the opportunity.

    And lastly, for those that state the wild card weekend rewards mediocrity. It actually places a premium on finishing top 6 which guarantees you a final berth. 

     

     

  • Quote
    • Shocked 1
    1 hour ago, ElDiablo14 said:

    Imagine using a dead rubber game to justify a stupid idea which only aims to generate more money, specially broadcasting money. 😮‍💨😮‍💨

    Imagine beating Collingwood this week with the opportunity of playing finals.

     

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, rpfc said:

    It will happen and it will be fine. Fun even.

    8 teams from 18 teams playing finals leave mechanisms like the ‘wildcard weekend’ as useful to keep people interested in their team, and by extension, footy in general.

    Get upset about more important things.

    I don't like the idea and feel it's stupid but I do think you might be right. Wasting energy on hating something like this is futile, like moving the Grand Final to night, there are more important things to be angry at.

    I'll say it again, I don't like it. Can I say that after 5 years of using this format that people won't wonder what they were worried about in the first place? I cannot. If it happens, just gotta lean into the change. 

  • Quote
    •  
    28 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    I do find it odd that most posters are against it, and yet which club would get one of the most benefits out of it this year?

    Which club would still be in the hunt heading into this weekend?

    Which club's supporters would be genuinely pumped up about this week with the chance of still playing in September?

    Which club's supporters would've enjoyed the GC win with the knowledge that genuine finals implications were on the line, not just a late season 'feel good' dead rubber.

    I refuse to believe that passionate die hard posters against the wild card would thumb their nose at an opportunity of playing a stand alone round of football with the chance to play finals. I know the club and its sponsors would embrace the opportunity.

    And lastly, for those that state the wild card weekend rewards mediocrity. It actually places a premium on finishing top 6 which guarantees you a final berth. 

     

     

    So are you saying that if we were 1-6 on the ladder, or no chance of finishing 9-10, you wouldn’t be in favour of it?

    If we’re saying 8/18 isn’t enough, but that we’re rewarding the top 6, isn’t that inconsistent? Why not just reward the top 8?

    Using the outcomes of an H&A season where there is no wildcard to justify how good it is also doesn’t make sense. Teams would likely do things differently in the lead up rounds if they’re targeting 10th instead of 8th. 

    But if you want to do that, go the other way. Would Fremantle v Port have any interest this week if Fremantle were already locked into wildcard round? Would there have been any excitement over Carlton’s final fortnight if they were already locked in?

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    Imagine beating Collingwood this week with the opportunity of playing finals.

     

    As if we deserve it. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 09

      Round 9 kicks off out west with the Dockers hosting a Collingwood side resting several stars. Fremantle need to make a statement on their home deck after some disappointing form on the road, while the Magpies will be keen to maintain their Top 2 position. Friday night sees a must-win clash between two sides desperate to stay in touch with the eight. St Kilda have shown glimpses while Carlton are clinging to relevance after a flat start to the season. Saturday’s twilight game at Marvel pits the Bombers against a struggling Sydney outfit. Essendon can’t afford another close match against a lower-ranked side, while the Swans risk sliding down the ladder even further. Up in Darwin, the fourth-placed Suns will look to extend their stay in the top four. The Bulldogs have hit their stride with three big wins on the trot and will be very keen to consolidate on their momentum. The always fiery Showdown looms as pivotal for both clubs. Adelaide are eyeing a spot in the Top 4 with a win, while Port Adelaide’s season could slip away if they drop another game and fall further behind the pack. Sunday begins with a yawn fest between Richmond and West Coast. The Tigers need to bank the points to stay clear of the bottom two, while the Eagles are still chasing their first win of the year. The Giants face one of the league’s toughest road trips as they travel to GMHBA Stadium to face the Cats. With GWS at risk of a third straight loss, Geelong will be eager to consolidate their position inside the eight and start their climb up the ladder. The round wraps up with the top-of-the-table Lions heading to Ninja Stadium to take on the second-last Roos. The Lions should easily take care of the struggling Roos who might be powerless against the best in the comp. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • 142 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Hawthorn

      Melbourne and Hawthorn who face off against each other this week have more in common than having once almost merged and about to wear a blue jumper with a red v triangle and an embroidered picture of a bird on the front. They also share the MCG as their main home ground, their supporters are associated with the leafy suburbs of Melbourne and in recent times, James Frawley graced the colours of both teams. Even more recently, both have bounced back from disastrous five game losing streaks to start off a season. Of course, the Hawks turned their bounce into a successful leap from the bottom of the ladder into a finals appearance, making it to the semifinals in 2024 and this year, they’re riding high in third place on the AFL table. The Demons are just three games into their 2025 bounce back, and are yet to climb their way out of the bottom four although they are sitting a game and percentage out of the top eight. However, with the current sportsbet odds of $3.90 to win this week’s encounter, it seems a forlorn hope that their upward progression will continue much longer.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Harvey Langford Interview

      On Wednesday I'll be interviewing the Melbourne Football Club's first pick in the 2024 National Draft and pick number 6 overall Harvey Langford. If you have any questions you want asked let me know. I will release the interview on Wednesday afternoon.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 35 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • REPORT: West Coast

      On a night of counting, Melbourne captain Max Gawn made sure that his contribution counted. He was at his best and superb in the the ruck from the very start of the election night game against the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium, but after watching his dominance of the first quarter and a half of the clash evaporate into nothing as the Eagles booted four goals in the last ten minutes of the opening half, he turned the game on its head, with a ruckman’s masterclass in the second half.  No superlatives would be sufficient to describe the enormity of the skipper’s performance starting with his 47 hit outs, a career-high 35 possessions (22 of them contested), nine clearances, 12 score involvements and, after messing up an attempt or two, finally capping off one of the greatest rucking performances of all time, with a goal of own in the final quarter not long after he delivered a right angled pass into the arms of Daniel Turner who also goaled from a pocket (will we ever know if the pass is what was intended). That was enough to overturn a 12 point deficit after the Eagles scored the first goal of the second half into a 29 point lead at the last break and a winning final quarter (at last) for the Demons who decided not to rest their champion ruckman at the end this time around. 

      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Hawthorn

      The Demons return to the MCG to take on the High Flying Hawks on Saturday Afternoon. Hawthorn will be aiming to consolidate a position in the Top 4 whilst the Dees will be looking to take a scalp and make it four wins in a row. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Like
      • 332 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: West Coast

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 5th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons 3rd win row for the season against the Eagles.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

        • Like
      • 25 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All