Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

I rate Houston. But I’m a bit relieved we didn’t get Houston.
Adding picks 5 and 9 to our list of young talent should see us seriously competitive for a very long time and should JT nail one or both picks in a super talented draft we could have a superstar. 

 
5 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Can someone explain how they can possibly fit Houston into their salary cap?

Cripps and Weitering are surely on very very good money. McKay, Walsh and Curnow just behind them, I assume. And they went on a multi-year recruitment extravaganza, presumably putting forward tempting financial offers to get Cerra, McGovern, Williams, Hewett and Saad. 

I know their depth is highly questionable, but is everyone else on $300,000 a year?


3 minutes ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

Can someone explain how they can possibly fit Houston into their salary cap?

Cripps and Weitering are surely on very very good money. McKay, Walsh and Curnow just behind them, I assume. And they went on a multi-year recruitment extravaganza, presumably putting forward tempting financial offers to get Cerra, McGovern, Williams, Hewett and Saad. 

I know their depth is highly questionable, but is everyone else on $300,000 a year?

I'd suggest that they will let Kennedy and Owies go. Their combined salary wouldn't be much different to Houston + a late draftee. And Houston isn't leaving Port for more money. 

56 minutes ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

Can someone explain how they can possibly fit Houston into their salary cap?
...
I know their depth is highly questionable, but is everyone else on $300,000 a year?

Brian Cook is a very good operator. If anyone can 'restructure' player payments he can.

 
2 hours ago, mo64 said:

And Houston isn't leaving Port for more money. 

More money was one of his main reasons for moving. He signed a long term contract for only reasonable money and then went two times AA and his value sky rocketed.

He'd be wanting $800k plus p.a.

Edited by Diamond_Jim

1 hour ago, M_9 said:

Brian Cook is a very good operator. If anyone can 'restructure' player payments he can.

I just found out who the President of Carlton is. Say no more. 


47 minutes ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

I just found out who the President of Carlton is. Say no more. 

CEO.
I've no doubt that BC would operate by the letter of the (AFL) law as regards player payments but if there are any loopholes, and I've no doubt there are, he'd find them.
An example would be the prospect of Clarry going to Geelong and taking a pay cut. I mean, really?

34 minutes ago, M_9 said:

CEO.
I've no doubt that BC would operate by the letter of the (AFL) law as regards player payments but if there are any loopholes, and I've no doubt there are, he'd find them.
An example would be the prospect of Clarry going to Geelong and taking a pay cut. I mean, really?

How much is a Ford Ranger + farm + free veg.

Looks like Houston is heading to the Pies with GC providing some charity. How GC is allowed to function as a football team is mind blowing.


That’s a heist from Collingwood. The suns are something else 

51 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

wtf. Suns are crazy at trading. Why do the Pies get Houston for a future 1st and Noble.  That’s it??? Wow. 

Plus Joe Richards and maybe other pick swaps.

7 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Plus Joe Richards and maybe other pick swaps.

Richards is steak knives, certainly not the 2xfirsts Port were asking. I think GC are salary dumping Atkins as well. Either way GC and Port with egg on their face, Pies laughing.

Pretty sure they left out the 2nd most important piece in Lukosius going to Port. Atkins is a salary dump. Richards is more than steak knives, and offers Port midfield depth. I think Port have done well.

But surely some later picks must be going to the Suns so they get points for Lombard.

Edit: Tom Morris was way off the mark. The Suns get 2 future 1st as part of the deal. Makes more sense now.

Edited by mo64


17 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Pretty sure they left out the 2nd most important piece in Lukosius going to Port. Atkins is a salary dump. Richards is more than steak knives, and offers Port midfield depth. I think Port have done well.

But surely some later picks must be going to the Suns so they get points for Lombard.

 

But Port paid a F1 for Luko which is pretty expensive for my tastes.

Maybe they get cap relief. But they’re taking on Ratkins so that counters that?

Just now, DeeSpencer said:

But Port paid a F1 for Luko which is pretty expensive for my tastes.

Maybe they get cap relief. But they’re taking on Ratkins so that counters that?

Yeah I just saw the deal in totality. GC haven't done too bad. Getting rid of Ratkins is a win. Lukosius could be another Jack Watts for Port, or he could fulfill his talent. 

4 minutes ago, mo64 said:

Yeah I just saw the deal in totality. GC haven't done too bad. Getting rid of Ratkins is a win. Lukosius could be another Jack Watts for Port, or he could fulfill his talent. 

They chose a Collingwood first over North. That’s a stinker.

Port’s deal a bit of a shocker.

Pies laughing 

 

Collingwood massive losers in that. Sure it gets them one step closer next year but they're really giving up depth and the future.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 113 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 31 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 22 replies
  • POSTGAME: Carlton

    A near full strength Demons were outplayed all night against a Blues outfit that was under the pump and missing at least 9 or 10 of the best players. Time for some hard decisions to be made across the board.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 329 replies