Jump to content

Featured Replies

7 minutes ago, demon3165 said:

Ah someone who takes notice welcome to the few gang who say it.

We just need to beat them at the contest. Deny them clearances and our backs will do the rest. Tonight they destroyed us in that area - as they have done before but not every game in recent times.

 

At least we've banked some wins. 

In the end we only had 2 less scoring shots. 

But they set it up in the 1st quarter with hipwood and daniher kicking multiple goals 

Edited by dees189227

12 minutes ago, Garbo said:

Goodwin should have switched to a man on man

Exactly. Brisbane just chipped it to players in space while we guarded grass. They made us look lazy and foolish.

 
1 minute ago, Dragon 9 said:

How many of Maxy's hit outs end up in Brisbanes hands

They took a leaf out of Carltons book from last week set themselves up for the punch down the ground smart move.

Just now, Jaded No More said:

They also tell me that we don’t just give up. Would you rather lose by 60? 
I am not suggesting the final score was a reflection of the true result, because it wasn’t. But better to give something than give up. Those were the Neeld days. I don’t ever want to see that again. 

Why can't they start say in the third quarter? Boggles the mind that the pride of this team only comes out once we are 7 goals down.


Just now, ElDiablo14 said:

Why can't they start say in the third quarter? Boggles the mind that the pride of this team only comes out once we are 7 goals down.

Much easier to dominate a quarter when the opposition know they’ve won the game. Just saying. 

11 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Noah Answerth = [censored].

Yeah the AFL craps on about social issues but wont lay a glove on Answerth. To mock someone the way he did was pathetic. Petty was obviously in a distressed state at the Gabba so to bring it up again is a dog act.

 
Just now, Dragon 9 said:

How many of Maxy's hit outs end up in Brisbanes hands

EXACTLY! Max is an overated ruckman! At Centre bounces!!  Great Mark, great around the ground, but a dare I say it... poor centre bounce ruck! Thought this for a while, just check his stats, and not just today!

Haha. We haven't had an old-fashioned floggin' in yonks. I had a great morning so whatevs. No learnings. Look forward to the Kolt causing random chaos at the pointy end of the season. Go Dees!


4 minutes ago, DemonWA said:

Hate the fair weather posters on demonland.

It's April. Crack and beer and relax 

Felt like a 122 point loss. Was only 22 in the end. Rest up boys and put in a better showing on Anzac eve

Crack and beer? Or crack a beer?

9 minutes ago, layzie said:

Haha the old walk and type! Doing it right now and about to walk into a tree.

Hopefully I walk into the yarra after that performance. At least stress free weekend 

Just now, Jaded No More said:

Much easier to dominate a quarter when the opposition know they’ve won the game. Just saying. 

That's right,but a champion team can't/shouldn't dish out these soulless performances.

9 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

They also tell me that we don’t just give up. Would you rather lose by 60? 
I am not suggesting the final score was a reflection of the true result, because it wasn’t. But better to give something than give up. Those were the Neeld days. I don’t ever want to see that again. 

Of course I'd rather go down fighting. I was cheering every 4th quarter goal like a pathetic lunatic and telling my mate that I'd take a winning quarter.

But for anyone to look at that and actually suggest our performance as a whole was not that bad is seriously deluded. There were moments in that game that were literally 2014 Melbourne. Let's not pat ourselves on the back too much about getting towelled up by a team that everyone thought was our bunny's not long ago on our home deck. 

 

Edited by layzie

1 minute ago, Deesprate said:

Yeah the AFL craps on about social issues but wont lay a glove on Answerth. To mock someone the way he did was pathetic. Petty was obviously in a distressed state at the Gabba so to bring it up again is a dog act.

No smart move don't think we don't do that..


Easily the worst Melbourne has played since 2019, pathetic, woeful, weak, gutless tripe, about 3 half decent players

Just now, picket fence said:

EXACTLY! Max is an overated ruckman! At Centre bounces!!  Great Mark, great around the ground, but a dare I say it... poor centre bounce ruck! Thought this for a while, just check his stats, and not just today!


Max is a 6 time AA premiership captain. He is not overrated, he’s one of the greatest ruckman of all time. 
 

Give it a rest, this is never an argument that you’ll win. 

What’s overreaction ans what’s real?

Backline:

Honestly did ok all things considered, but they still aren’t linking run and handballs. And the switching game comes and goes. Kickout plan now requires Juddy to lace the ball rather than any movement to create kicks.

Midfield;

They got smacked. Tracc had no juice. Oliver upped last weeks fumbly disaster. Sparrow, I love him, he does his role, he’s not a primary on baller.

Forwards

[censored] plan, worse execution. Had very little help but we can’t keep playing the 3 talls and Fritsch if they can’t catch it and can’t work functional leads. No help bodying Harris. No leading up to create space.

His fan club will come out to defend him as usual but we are playing 17 on 18 with Bayley out the Back Fritsch in his current role. He’s nearly impossible to stick with on a well timed lead, so can he just once lead up at the ball? Give his mids a simple target and let the other forwards cruise in behind. Spread the backline.

He’s a player capable of so much more but his entire game is attempting to get goal side and have it laced out. He has to be challenged to grow as a footballer.


 

1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:

Much easier to dominate a quarter when the opposition know they’ve won the game. Just saying. 

I’d like to think they got to our level of fatigue aha. Junk time goals helping the % at least 

23 minutes ago, praha said:

I honestly don't even think we were that bad. We were slow and battered and Brisbane absolutely came out firing. If our worst equates to a 22 point loss against a full strength Brisbane then I'll take that. Richmond and Collingwood both had far worse outings in their Premiership winning years.

Can you point me to those outings please. Might help us all feel better 


1 minute ago, Jaded No More said:


Max is a 6 time AA premiership captain. He is not overrated, he’s one of the greatest ruckman of all time. 
 

Give it a rest, this is never an argument that you’ll win. 

Watch this and other replays closely! 

7 minutes ago, DemonWA said:

Crack and beer and relax 

I’ll have the beer, but I’m staying away from that other stuff.

1 minute ago, layzie said:

Of course I'd rather go down fighting. I was cheering every 4th quarter goal like a pathetic lunatic and telling my mate that I'd take a winning quarter.

But for anyone to look at that ans actually suggest our performance as a whole was not that bad is seriously deluded. There were moments in that game that were literally 2014 Melbourne. Let's not pat ourselves on the back too much about getting towelled up by a team that everyone thought was our bunny's not long ago on our home deck. 

 

Doubt anyone who actually watched the game is thinking that margin reflects the results. We were comprehensively beaten by a side that played much better football. 
Last week Norf went down by 70. I rather not see that from my team. 

 

Also I go to have an eye-test now and buy reading glasses while early afternoon tipsy. Should be interesting. 

The 22-point margin was the most misleading statistic of the night. For most of the game it looked like men against boys.

For three quarters our handling and kicking were sloppy, defensive pressure in midfield was non-existent, and delivery to the forward line was rare. Brisbane could hardly have believed the amount of time and space they were gifted to mount their attacks.

With Bowey still out and Salem facing a stint on the sidelines, there are now serious questions about our depth.

Sadly, Windsor found it hard to cope with the pressure tonight and Tholstrup is clearly far from AFL-ready.

Pickett's pace and guile were badly missed, and Woewoedin is certainly not an adequate replacement for Brayshaw.

Worst of all, Oliver is a country mile away from the player we know he can be. On his display tonight you would probably put him on the trade table.

Goodwin will have to do some serious thinking about the midfield mix.

 

 

Edited by Dee-monic


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 527 replies