Jump to content

Featured Replies

8 hours ago, Left Foot Snap said:

I don't think enough has been said about Woey keeping his spot with other players available. Well done lad, keep it going.

Absolutely.

He will keep improving with experience.
Is very composed with his disposal and that is something a few in our side lack.

We have found another soldier.

 
11 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Is corridor football the equivalent of Bazball

I love it. High risk.  High reward. And more entertaining!!! 

2 hours ago, Kent said:

Is Hibbo still being ,managed? I want him Cherry ripe for later in the year 

will allow Bowey to go forward where he will be a great link man

JS the sub? 

Not sure why people are hung up on this.  Bowie is not going forward.  we would have seen it already.

 
17 minutes ago, Travy14 said:

Not sure why people are hung up on this.  Bowie is not going forward.  we would have seen it already.

Not a hang up just think he would really impact with good decisions and skill

Allow Hibbo to do what he does I want both in the team

23 minutes ago, Travy14 said:

Not sure why people are hung up on this.  Bowie is not going forward.  we would have seen it already.

This. 

I think his current position is as forward as he’ll get, he’s a lock in the defensive set up but the press allows him to get up to 50 and occasionally sneak in and be a target or have a shot if his opponent isn’t paying attention.

Wouldn’t expect to see him ever playing as a forward. 


11 minutes ago, Kent said:

Not a hang up just think he would really impact with good decisions and skill

Allow Hibbo to do what he does I want both in the team

he has been training and playing as a def all year, it's not a smart move to put someone into a new system and expect them to learn it in 5 weeks.

Very good way to confuse a player and stunt development too.  Bowie is a great backman and should stay there.  the players that would move for Hibbo would be Brayshaw and Rivers who have both had midfield roles this year so have been training in that area. 

1 minute ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

This. 

I think his current position is as forward as he’ll get, he’s a lock in the defensive set up but the press allows him to get up to 50 and occasionally sneak in and be a target or have a shot if his opponent isn’t paying attention.

Wouldn’t expect to see him ever playing as a forward. 

agree 100% he is very damaging up higher, but as a def. as is Salem.  

37 minutes ago, Travy14 said:

Not sure why people are hung up on this.  Bowie is not going forward.  we would have seen it already.

You need to consider we have had many weeks with no Salem or Hibberd injured/managed and no Oliver meaning Brayshaw into the pivot meaning he has generally had a spot in the back 7 most weeks. McVee and Rivers sustained impact and Bowey’s recent return to form means something has to give if they want Hibbo into the run for finals. Bowey is too good to be at VFL so considering his skill set may fill the gap left by Spargos current and Chandlers recent form it seems a alternative we should consider over omission even if not tried before now.

Edited by Lil_red_fire_engine

 
15 hours ago, DubDee said:

Good changes. Chandler lucky to come back in after not showing too much at Casey but we need his run and pressure.

I reckon if he kicks a goal or two the wheel will turn for him

Crows significantly impacted by their outs. Laird is huge

I think Goody is showing who he wants in the finals side. Jvr didn't knock the door down but is back. Having said that, I think Goodwin will test both of these players and he's not afraid of dropping them again. Despite Goody saying there's plenty of time left to sort things out, there isn't. It's crunch time. Jvr, Chandler and Bbb are all in the mix. We need at least one tall so Jvr or Bbb are a lock one would think. Hopefully Grundy comes in soon to pick up the slack so to speak. Big game for Melksham again . If Fritta returns to fitness, he's definitely coming in for finals so it's up to Milk to keep his spot. No reason we can't have two mediums.

Just now, Lil_red_fire_engine said:

You need to consider we have had many weeks with no Salem or Hibberd injured/managed and no Oliver meaning Brayshaw into the pivot. McVee and Rivers sustained impact and Bowey’s recent return to form means something has to give if they want Hibbo into the run for finals. Bowey is too good to be at VFL so considering his skill set may fill the gap left by Spargos current and Chandlers recent form it seems a alternative we should consider over omission even if not tried before now.

He doesn't play those positions, he hasn't trained for it and doesn't know the system properly.  Yes he is a brilliant by foot but thats no good if he isn't putting on pressure and in the right spots.

Brayshaw is a midfielder and i think thats where he wil be even at full strength, its exactly what we did last year this time.

Why would he be omitted? Rivers is playing more up the ground in the Wing rotation Brayshaw is in the middle.


Prediction Tomlinson to kick 5 .J.Smith to play defence Dees to win by 29,39,49 ..... pts anything with a 9 in it.

1 minute ago, Travy14 said:

He doesn't play those positions, he hasn't trained for it and doesn't know the system properly.  Yes he is a brilliant by foot but thats no good if he isn't putting on pressure and in the right spots.

Brayshaw is a midfielder and i think thats where he wil be even at full strength, its exactly what we did last year this time.

Why would he be omitted? Rivers is playing more up the ground in the Wing rotation Brayshaw is in the middle.

Rivers has played a few rotations in the middle but to my knowledge has never lined up on a wing. If Hibberd plays this week who is your back 7 or are we changing our structure to a back 8. To be clear my preference would be stick with the back 7 and manage Hibbo as next up if required. However I would not want to see Bowey out of the 22 and would prefer a creative solution if that becomes a potential possibility in a role that would be available on recent form of Spargo and. Chandler.  

 

16 minutes ago, COOLX said:

Prediction Tomlinson to kick 5 .J.Smith to play defence Dees to win by 29,39,49 ..... pts anything with a 9 in it.

I'd reconsider those brekky bongs if I were you.

12 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

Is corridor football the equivalent of Bazball

Neither work in wet weather 🤞

Whats Bazball? Ive heard that word pop up occassionally.

I assume its  one if those mindless forms of TV entertaintment thought up by corporate execs for couch potatoes.


3 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Danger game.   Crows on the rebound after last quarter fade out. They’ve got some talent and we will need to watch Rankine who usually plays well against us.  Judd Mcvee gets the job imv and I’ll back him in. May gets Tex and Tomlinson on Fogarty.  Backs with Lever as intercept look ok.  
Without Laird, our midfield clearly should win the day. Gawn and the Mids will give us plenty of supply so like to see JVR and BBB actually hit the scoreboard and nail a few goals each.  Kozzzy to light it up hopefully.  

Do the have a backline, Is that their weakness?

36 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

Does anyone know with the AFL app to watch games whilst abroad can you watch replays or only live?

 

thanks

My overseas mate (UK) watches replays on Watchafl (either that or he'd had to be up in the middle of the night for live games).

Edited by sue

20 hours ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

Actually, it’s the complete reverse. The player in question is arguably the player least bagged on DL. Besides that, he couldn’t give a fat rat’s about anything that’s said about him or his teammates. That’s as much of a hint as I’ll give since I know that people who you’d think don’t read DL, actually do. 😉 

 

2023 pick #4?

10 minutes ago, sue said:

My overseas mate (UK) watches replays on Watchafl (either that or he'd had to be up in the middle of the night for live games).

Much appreciated.


Between all the cricket talk, a night with WCW at the pub and reading trip advisor this thread is officially rooted.

25 minutes ago, speed demon said:

2023 pick #4?

The young kids are by far and away the most approachable and the least impatient, without exception.

Anyways, I need to apologise to *anyone who read my comments very late last night on this thread (which have since been deleted, thank you Andy and it won’t happen again, I promise). I just need to remember in future to hide my phone from drunk me.

*except for the two posters who rattled my cage last night. I don’t remember what I said but a very good buddy of mine on here screenshot it before the mods deleted and just sent it to me and yeah, I still don’t apologise to those two. But sincere apologies to everyone else. 💕

 

5 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

Between all the cricket talk, a night with WCW at the pub and reading trip advisor this thread is officially rooted.

Bring on GameDay thread! I’ve got a tonne of off-topics to share!!!

JK Andy. I’ll behave myself henceforth. 

 
18 hours ago, Fromgotowoewodin said:

Edit: Never mind, this speculation doesn’t end anywhere good

Speculation. LOL. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Clap
      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 164 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Vomit
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Haha
    • 4 replies