Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, BDA said:

I've seen it all now. The worst possible way to decide a match. If i was North fan i would be spewing right now

Who is on their bench keeping track of interchange numbers??? What the [censored]!

 
1 minute ago, BDA said:

I've seen it all now. The worst possible way to decide a match. If i was North fan i would be spewing right now

Taken the heat off the boundary ump from last night.

1 minute ago, dees189227 said:

Nth made to many interchange rotations. So the umps are correct and that's the rule.

Gee nth can't take a trick

gifting the game based on that infringement is a ludicrous rule. 

make Nth play with 17 players for 5 minutes or any other punishment 

 
1 minute ago, Dee Zephyr said:

You can’t make this shiit up. 
FMD North 

How do you reckon Clarkson's going now if he was watching 

On 5/19/2023 at 9:39 AM, Diamond_Jim said:

Bulldogs have a nice little deal going with their Ballarat games. Reportedly they get $1M from the State Government to play there.

Could we have a game in say sunny Mildura.

The irony is that the ground capacity in Ballarat is so small most Dog supporters don't bother with the trip

Yet AGL HQ insist that Hobart needs a $300,000,000 stadium.  What a pack of hypocrites.  


Just now, DubDee said:

gifting the game based on that infringement is a ludicrous rule. 

make Nth play with 17 players for 5 minutes or any other punishment 

It was because the ball was inside there 50. The free kick is where the ball is. But yeah it's harsh but all the other teams have managed to count

 

North are competing with Melbourne for the decade from hell. They cannot do anything right and cannot take a trick. 
My Swans supporting friend is at the game. Said s young North fan next to them is bawling their eyes out. It’s just so heartbreaking because you know what that feels like!

1 minute ago, DubDee said:

gifting the game based on that infringement is a ludicrous rule. 

make Nth play with 17 players for 5 minutes or any other punishment 

Yet when players on the ACTUAL FIELD don’t line up in THE CORRECT PLACES THAT COULD DIRECTLY IMPACT THE GAME, everyone gets a warning????

That makes no sense.

 


No doubt the steward got it right, but as a hypothetical it would be interesting what would happen if, when North review their interchanges, it shows they only did 75. 

3 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

How do you reckon Clarkson's going now if he was watching 

5E565DAC-90B1-4A8F-A7EF-99A13E2BD59A.gif.bc4791a1e8a15a9985aaa06d280a9be9.gif

  • Author

The North bench stuffed it up and paid a massive price.  What a rotten way to lose a match.

Look on the bright side.  The win edged Sydney above Freo on the ladder.

Bloody hell.  I'm no friend of Norf but even I'm wondering how many times the footy gods can fart in their faces. Brutal way to lose. 


2 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

It was because the ball was inside there 50. The free kick is where the ball is. But yeah it's harsh but all the other teams have managed to count

100%

Everyone knows what the rule is - it's not hard. Is a real pity for North though.

10 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

No conspiracy. Nth stuffed up there interchange rotations. Surely there is someone on the nth bench that counts these

I’m not doubting the free kick - but the delivery system for that from a gamesmanship perspective is horrific.

’Hi, I’m a voice from above that no one can hear but you. Yeah, that team wins. Cheers’

4 minutes ago, Kit Walker said:

100%

Everyone knows what the rule is - it's not hard. Is a real pity for North though.

Yet what happens, if, sometime in the future a similar thing happens but the interchange steward and not the club got the count wrong?

Interesting. Last night a Port Player did not leave the field though the interchange gate. Someone posted the footage and asked the question last night.

 

L AWS OF AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL 2022 25PART C
7. INTERCHANGE
7.1 INTERCHANGE STEWARD – APPOINTMENT AND DUTIES
A Controlling Body may appoint two Interchange Stewards to officiate during
a Match. The Interchange Stewards shall:
(a) be positioned throughout the Match at or near the Interchange Area;
(b) monitor and approve the interchange of Players made by each Team
during a Match; and
(c) report to the field Umpire any infringement by a Team of this Law 7.
7.2 PROCEDURE FOR INTERCHANGE
The following procedure shall apply to the interchange of Players during
a Match who are listed on the Team Sheet:
(a) unless Law 7.3 applies, the Players intending to interchange shall leave
and enter the Playing Surface through the Interchange Area;
(b) where a Player does not leave or enter the Playing Surface as specified under
Law 7.2(a), the Interchange Steward shall report the breach to a field Umpire
and the following shall apply:
(i) the field Umpire shall stop play at the first available opportunity;
(ii) a field Umpire shall award a Free Kick to the nearest Player of the
opposing Team; and
(iii) a Fifty Metre Penalty shall then be imposed from the position where the
Free Kick was awarded. For the avoidance of doubt, Law 7.2 operates
in conjunction with Law 5.5 where a Team has more than the permitted
number of Players on the Playing Surface

Just now, YearOfTheDees said:

Interesting. Last night a Port Player did not leave the field though the interchange gate. Someone posted the footage and asked the question last night.

 

L AWS OF AUSTRALIAN FOOTBALL 2022 25PART C
7. INTERCHANGE
7.1 INTERCHANGE STEWARD – APPOINTMENT AND DUTIES
A Controlling Body may appoint two Interchange Stewards to officiate during
a Match. The Interchange Stewards shall:
(a) be positioned throughout the Match at or near the Interchange Area;
(b) monitor and approve the interchange of Players made by each Team
during a Match; and
(c) report to the field Umpire any infringement by a Team of this Law 7.
7.2 PROCEDURE FOR INTERCHANGE
The following procedure shall apply to the interchange of Players during
a Match who are listed on the Team Sheet:
(a) unless Law 7.3 applies, the Players intending to interchange shall leave
and enter the Playing Surface through the Interchange Area;
(b) where a Player does not leave or enter the Playing Surface as specified under
Law 7.2(a), the Interchange Steward shall report the breach to a field Umpire
and the following shall apply:
(i) the field Umpire shall stop play at the first available opportunity;
(ii) a field Umpire shall award a Free Kick to the nearest Player of the
opposing Team; and
(iii) a Fifty Metre Penalty shall then be imposed from the position where the
Free Kick was awarded. For the avoidance of doubt, Law 7.2 operates
in conjunction with Law 5.5 where a Team has more than the permitted
number of Players on the Playing Surface

Footage of this anywhere?


3 minutes ago, The heart beats true said:

Footage of this anywhere?

Was on Twitter last night. Will see if I can find it. They asked the question 'When did the rule get changed" Never thought much of it until I read the rules just then.

Edited by YearOfTheDees

28 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Yet what happens, if, sometime in the future a similar thing happens but the interchange steward and not the club got the count wrong?

Then that would be an equally massive stuff up.

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies