Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 hours ago, Mickey said:

Judd McVee played on him a bit

Dusty got some stats but his overall effect on the game was low, unreliable and just that little bit 'slip-shod'. Against his normal and anticipated influence on games, he was 'well below par' in my mind and, was rather simply avoided by Dees' players.

 
39 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Yes we did!!!

 

PLAYED

WIN

LOSS

FOR

AGAINST

%

POINTS

MELBOURNE

2

2

0

226

117

193.16

8

BRISBANE

2

2

0

190

99

191.92

8

ADELAIDE

2

2

2

188

118

159.32

8

WESTERN BULLDOGS

1

1

0

143

85

168.24

4

GWS

1

1

0

122

77

158.44

4

GEELONG

2

1

1

183

144

127.08

4

FREMANTLE

2

1

1

158

138

114.49

4

ESSENDON

2

1

1

80

75

106.67

4

SYDNEY

2

1

1

151

153

98.69

4

COLLINGWOOD

2

1

1

180

184

97.83

4

ST. KILDA

2

1

1

113

137

82.48

4

CARLTON

2

1

1

138

171

80.70

4

RICHMOND

2

1

1

146

194

75.26

4

WEST COAST

2

1

1

136

187

72.73

4

GOLD COAST

2

0

2

75

80

93.75

0

PORT ADELAIDE

2

0

2

137

176

77.84

0

NORTH MELBOURNE

2

0

2

158

218

72.48

0

HAWTHORN

2

0

2

153

244

62.70

0

Damn. Adelaide are going to be tough this year. Played 2 games for 2 wins and 2 losses. ;)

3 hours ago, Ollie fan said:

And I think we need to do a LOT of work on our leading patterns in the forward line - there were too many times when we got a great centre clearance tgat was crying out for a good forward lead but instead went nowhere. 

That is true - but I have that feeling that it will be more self-evident and be progressively addressed by the players themselves as the early rounds of the season get underway. Fritta's return will help address 50% of the opportunity problems in this regard.

 
18 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Clydeaho still stinks to high heaven. Richmond supporters live locally and would rock up to Baghdad for a game of footy.

But they’ve finally added a second entrance to the fields so you can get in and out. Plus almost enough car parks given the only way to get there is to drive. I literally heard Richmond supporters bragging about drink driving which is always nice.

A stack of roadworks down Clyde road widening the road because they were too stupid or greedy to do that before they built all the housing.

Not nearly enough toilets, food or drink facilities and there wasn’t enough capacity on the hill for todays game either.

At least the usual gale force winds were replaced with sticky humidity. A nice change, especially when there’s next to no shade out there. 

And yet… 

So many people.
Toy Story Disney GIF

3 hours ago, Lil_red_fire_engine said:

Great to see a strong win against good oppo. The Tap Brothers dominant. Our midfield and half back spread excellent and our speed of ball movement and execution frightening for this time of year. The only concerns for me were Brown (who should come out for Fritsch) and Harmes constant ability to turn the ball over after doing all the hard work to win it. Great to see McVee get the chance to take Dusty and Taj get a look in in the last  (and look up to the pace).

And of course the most important thing no injuries.

Could not have asked for much more from the hit out.

Brown for Fritch NOT IN A MONTH OF SUNDAYS but Fritta comes back .... but not for BBB


2 hours ago, Demi Dee said:

Little things I loved perched on the fence today:

The confidence the players have in each other. 

Clarey working off half back on occasion 
Lachie Hunter- so wonderful to have two damaging and solid wings

Grawndy positioning on either side of the ground for the kick down the line. Had Richmond second guessing on numerous occasions 

Bowey. Nailed the little things and was creative. 
fluid , creative mid field rotations (thought ANB and Kozzie really added to this, as did Rivers)- Harmes let himself down with the turnovers  

second half forward structure had, at times, two talks deep and all smalls on the half forward line. 
 

BBB haircut, but think with the rucks floating forward and Fritsch to come in, the forward line might be better running a little smaller. JVR could also provide a different focus, will be interesting to see. 

I" say this again JVR might be  a future solution ,but right now is VERY VERY RAW

Give me BBB ANYTIME😁

2 hours ago, monoccular said:

Is anyone else worried about Angus?   From where I was looking he appeared slow and not very involved. Maybe I just didn’t notice him. 

When the players are under increased pressure with the ball in their possession - and they have to move it on, positively to a teammate ASAP / immediately to avoid losing a possession no matter how brief it might have been - Angus is your man. Today, against Richmond, he read the tackles and the set-ups in such moments and nearly always, positioned himself to perfection - particularly in the second half - to achieve or gather the wanton pass/handball/tap and move it on for the team to better effect. Mr Fix-it.

11 minutes ago, picket fence said:

I" say this again JVR might be  a future solution ,but right now is VERY VERY RAW

Give me BBB ANYTIME😁

Love BBB. Just making note of the forward setup I saw today in the second quarter and it had an exciting feel about it. BBB was there and helped create that feel, but with the rucks dropping in I felt the extra tall forward role could be well served by a more fluid player. No denying the benefits of the big man himself. Just opening the question on the delivery and conversion into our forward half and whether a new approach could provide us with a more effective outcome. Happy to discuss further, just an observation, not a dogmatic statement. 

 
3 hours ago, Willmoy1947 said:

Checking his nuts.

he got a "tap" to the solar plexus from Baker

Just finished watching on replay. 
My main take away is that Kamdyn McIntosh should just shave his head. C’mon mate, you’re not fooling anyone. 


Thought we did well when we didn't have ball. The Tiges got nailed multiple times because they couldn't find the outlet. 

Great pressure game, forcing turnovers and then rebounding. Many of the Tiges best couldn't get enough of the ball.

How about Gotchin putting the elbows into Harmes head, when he had him pinned on the ground. Stupid, unnecessary, poor self control, should get cited by the match review. 

Our spread was good, as was the field kicking, noticed some of our kick outs went to the right.

They were making good separation from their opponents, we are fit, fast and smart.

Thought Chandler and McVee have done enough to keep their spots. Hibbo is possibly depth, the same as Melky. 

BBB and TMac still need to find their straps. Hopefully on the big stage. Less spear passes into the forwards today, hope they lift the eyes and find those short kicks. 

Tracc dominant, loved his on the run goal, in the face of Dusty. Wait till Clarry tries (thought he was half intensity), he will kill it. We seemed to do alright at the stoppages. 

Brody taking marks forward, May taking them in the backline, beautiful.

Wings are taken care of.

So many rotating through the on ball mids, I wonder if that will be how we go next time or the coaches were just trying things out. 

Back-line looked steady, though never really under pressure. Great ball movement off that line.

How about the way Kossie moves! Wow, get the ball in his hands MFC players.

 

Edited by kev martin

26 minutes ago, kev martin said:

How about Gotchin putting the elbows into Harmes head, when he had him pinned on the ground. Stupid, unnecessary, poor self control, should get cited by the match review.

Didn't Viney get suspended for that a year or two back?

6 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

In a practice game 🤦

Which makes it all the more pleasing… it means we were performing against a team that was 100% committed, as opposed to just going through the motions in a practice match.


6 minutes ago, Demonland said:

here is the Cotchin incident 

He hit Harmes twice in the head with his elbow.

Looks like Yeo's is into the neck area.

Edited by kev martin

Do the casuals on here still think Grundy was a bad acquisition? 🤪

Spargo is playing good football! 

Edited by kev martin

  • Author
19 minutes ago, kev martin said:

He hit Harmes twice in the head with his elbow.

Looks like Yeo's is into the neck area.

Both are bad. The head was meant to be sacrosanct last year but the MRP turned a blind eye to “name” players. No name players of course are canon fodder for the MRP. 

Cotchin will get off scot-free


5 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Didn't Viney get suspended for that a year or two back?

This action seems to be Cotchin's modus operandi in so many matches - certainly, many times against the Dees over the past few seasons. He is a strangler, attempting to damage the larynx and trachea of players with that forearm, elbow and full body weight driven vertically into the sensitive frontal neck area when a player is on the ground. Viney did get a reprimand for this action a while ago and learned his lesson - but Cochin never does. It is a seriously dangerous action poorly regulated by umpires from a number of exponents across the 'popular' clubs.

4 hours ago, kev martin said:

Spargo is playing good football! 

His performances have risen and he is 'sought' by teammates for his vision, passing and innovative ball retention. Sparrow and Rivers are producing great contributions, as well. Both are now 'courageous' interceptors, 'beautiful' kicks and surprisingly adept distributors. ANB was impressive against the Tigers, producing nifty intercepts and multiple area tackles to interrupt the flow of ball-handling and distribution amongst the Tigers' best efforts. His ground coverage was extensive, rapid and highly valuable.

 
6 hours ago, Deemented Are Go! said:

Just finished watching on replay. 
My main take away is that Kamdyn McIntosh should just shave his head. C’mon mate, you’re not fooling anyone. 

Yes that jumped out at me too.

Surprised it wasn’t on the commentary really. 

They’re always missing things…

8 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Haven’t seen the game but I’m loving what I’m reading in this thread. All sounding positive with Viney, Fritsch and Salem all still to work back into the side. 

Why?

Petty’s played 2 years in defence, and done very well at it. Why are so many so obsessed with Petty as a forward?

Van Rooyen’s trained all summer as a forward. What makes you recommend him as a defender option?

Gawn or Grundy will be forward 50-70% of game time. It looked fine yesterday because Gawn and Grundy dominated the air, but there will be times that we will not be so dominant and we will look too slow and lack defensive pressure. 

van Rooyen is a better ground level player may complement the Tap Brothers better. I’m just not convinced he’s got the game to be the 50 goal forward that we need in 2023. Our ball movement is going to be a lot more attacking this year because we have two true wingers, so whoever plays forward is going to get great supply. Petty is the only one I’m confident would kick 50+ goals and not be a defensive liability.

I would also add that key forwards often take a long time to become accretive players. Even some of the top liners like Hawkins and Kennedy took years to develop. Others like Neitz, TMac and Lynch, who started in defence, were much more productive early in their careers. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies