Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

"Lies, damned lies and Bloody statistics" poetic license..

10 hours ago, A F said:

You're massively overselling Daw and as usual way off with Petty. It's laughable you think the club will drop Petty for Daw. Ever.

Petty has been good but he was well below average against the crows. 

But then again apart from Lever our defence was a shambles. Not unlike our forward line either.

 

 
On 5/22/2021 at 8:29 PM, picket fence said:

BROWN should never have been dropped in the first place, would he have missed that easy goal from 35 out that Weeds chocked on? Nar, Melksham should almost not be picked until he shows some intensity was woeful tonight!

Agreed. He was good in one game. Average in another and below standard in his third.

You should not drop players after one bad game. Having said that the same argument could be used for sam w. He was ok in his first game.

But agreed the club was way too hasty in dropping bb and did so in a juggling act.

Perhaps sam should have come in first.

Three games is alright to make a decision upon but not on the way bb played in all of his.

He kicked five goals in two of them.

 

4 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Agreed. He was good in one game. Average in another and below standard in his third.

You should not drop players after one bad game. Having said that the same argument could be used for sam w. He was ok in his first game.

But agreed the club was way too hasty in dropping bb and did so in a juggling act.

Perhaps sam should have come in first.

Three games is alright to make a decision upon but not on the way bb played in all of his.

He kicked five goals in two of them.

 

Someone earlier in this thread (or another perhaps) made a great point that BBs value isnt just his raw goals and stats. He draws the best defender and then also draws another to nearly every marking contest (and he's rarely outmarked) Both Frit and McDonald had career standout games with him in the side. None of that goes on his stat sheet


In: covid

Out: every mfc player.

 

On 5/25/2021 at 4:57 PM, Demons11 said:

Complete rubbish.  Inside players can definitely be tagged.  Libba feeds it out to all their runners, so stopping it at the source is imperative 

I don’t agree with this, in terms of hedging bets because we’ve been at our best when losing the clearances but providing immediate heat and pressure to the ball carrier.  Libba feeds it out and that is where he does the damage, but it’s not as damaging as the players who are setting up entries by foot once it gets outside.

Shut down Macrae and give him no room so even if he gets it every disposal is under pressure. Same with Bont and Daniel

Just my opinion 

 

Similar to what is being discussed with Tom Mitchell right now.

His effect is being nullified because he's got no one of use to give the ball to.

 
2 hours ago, Jjrogan said:

Someone earlier in this thread (or another perhaps) made a great point that BBs value isnt just his raw goals and stats. He draws the best defender and then also draws another to nearly every marking contest (and he's rarely outmarked) Both Frit and McDonald had career standout games with him in the side. None of that goes on his stat sheet

Played one poor game out of only three for the year and was dropped. Very impatient in view.

Compare that to Melkshams record and constant selection.

2 hours ago, BW511 said:

Similar to what is being discussed with Tom Mitchell right now.

His effect is being nullified because he's got no one of use to give the ball to.

But mostly because he just wasn't all that good to begin with, then had a nasty injury.

I think Libba has to be sat on at the coal face and Bont can't be allowed easy kicks, they're deadly players in those situations, otherwise it's a team effort.

Dealing with the Dogs inside to out flick around handball game is a whole different beast though. We have to win our share of the ball and then we have to pressure like mad to stand a chance of shutting that down. I'm very worried about the likes of Brayshaw and Melksham who don't have that quick change of direction and constant energy, they'll leave glaring gaps in the net of pressure required to close down the Dogs.


I believe Ben Brown will always draw the oppositions best defender. Its my belief that Weiderman will draw the 2nd best behind TomMc (If no BB) or maybe 3rd best behind either of,  Luke Jackson or Fritta depending on matchups.

How other teams regard our firepower should resonate and give a clue in regard to giving Sam Weiderman chances to 'come good". How many good games is it fair to say he has had? I think 10 is generous. He has played nearly 50 games IIRC.

3 hours ago, Pennant St Dee said:

I don’t agree with this, in terms of hedging bets because we’ve been at our best when losing the clearances but providing immediate heat and pressure to the ball carrier.  Libba feeds it out and that is where he does the damage, but it’s not as damaging as the players who are setting up entries by foot once it gets outside.

Shut down Macrae and give him no room so even if he gets it every disposal is under pressure. Same with Bont and Daniel

Just my opinion 

 

I believe Mcrae is the danger...apart from the HB's he's the generator.

Bont is a good player but it's Macrae, he's gettable and I think we need to put work into him.

39 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Dealing with the Dogs inside to out flick around throw game is a whole different beast though.

I fixed it up for you.

9 minutes ago, Damo said:

I believe Ben Brown will always draw the oppositions best defender. Its my belief that Weiderman will draw the 2nd best behind TomMc (If no BB) or maybe 3rd best behind either of,  Luke Jackson or Fritta depending on matchups.

How other teams regard our firepower should resonate and give a clue in regard to giving Sam Weiderman chances to 'come good". How many good games is it fair to say he has had? I think 10 is generous. He has played nearly 50 games IIRC.

Good games 5, average 5 below average 36. In his sixth season for 46 games says it all for me.

Edited by old dee

59 minutes ago, rjay said:

I believe Mcrae is the danger...apart from the HB's he's the generator.

Bont is a good player but it's Macrae, he's gettable and I think we need to put work into him.

Agree, tag Mcrae (Harmes).

We could play Bont like we did Dusty:  have a midfielder 'stand him' (a big ask for Jordon; maybe Melksham) when in the middle and let Hibberd close tag him when he goes forward. 

Those moves won't stop the Bulldogs entirely but they may be enough to stifle their forward forays and slow down their ball movement, giving our defence more time to structure up when they do get the clearances. 

Bevo is not shy about making in game changes so if our tactics work he will make moves to counteract them.  We need to be very alert to his tactics.  Not give it a quarter to see how it pans out like we have in the past, by which time they will pile on a bunch of goals and the game is gone.

Edited by Lucifer's Hero


2 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Agree, tag Mcrae (Harmes).

We could play Bont like we did Dusty:  have a midfielder 'stand him' (a big ask for Jordon; maybe Melksham) when in the middle and let Hibberd close tag him when he goes forward. 

Those moves won't stop the Bulldogs entirely but they may be enough to stifle their forward forays and slow down their ball movement, giving our defence more time to structure up when they do get the clearances. 

Bevo is not shy about making in game changes so if our tactics work he will make moves to counteract them.  We need to be very alert to his tactics.  Not give it a quarter to see how it pans out like we have in the past, by which time they will pile on a bunch of goals and the game is gone.

Probably let Trac & Bont go head to head in the middle...Hibbo pick him up forward.

Wonder if they will tag Oliver or Trac?

Probably Libba & Oliver will fight it out around the ball.

Brayshaw to work hard on Hunter, he gets too much ball on us.

Let them worry about Langdon.

8 hours ago, Doug Reemer said:

I 100% beleive in UFO's. Which by definitions are just Unidentified Flying Objects. Doesn't necessarily mean they are alien.

99.99% of UFO sightings are either BS or explainable by terrestrial phenomena 

The eyewitness accounts of David Fravor (a very sober and credible navy commanader) and his crew who saw that object, the radar tracking, the fact their radar was jammed when they got close (which is an act of war byw) and the speeds and maneuverability of the object are very hard to explain. a real head scratcher.

Probably a conversation for a different thread

Teams announced in about 30 minutes.

Andy  @Demonland  will need to get the 'Teams' thread ready.

3 hours ago, Damo said:

I believe Ben Brown will always draw the oppositions best defender. Its my belief that Weiderman will draw the 2nd best behind TomMc (If no BB) or maybe 3rd best behind either of,  Luke Jackson or Fritta depending on matchups.

How other teams regard our firepower should resonate and give a clue in regard to giving Sam Weiderman chances to 'come good". How many good games is it fair to say he has had? I think 10 is generous. He has played nearly 50 games IIRC.

Hes certainly not tracking the way most expected. Fifty games is starting to look like enough. 

At this stage Im leaning towards bb but sw deserves another game or two.

Bb was unjustly dropped after three ...they didnt give him a fair run so lets at least give Sam a few more  games 

5 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Hes certainly not tracking the way most expected. Fifty games is starting to look like enough. 

At this stage Im leaning towards bb but sw deserves another game or two.

Bb was unjustly dropped after three ...they didnt give him a fair run so lets at least give Sam a few more  games 

I am perplexed as to why? He is all of a sudden going to be better than his previous 46 games? 

Edited by old dee


Due to integrity of selection they won't do this but I'd bring in BBB and drop the Weid to Casey for the rest of the year and thus rendering him a depth player.

Last week we were crying out for a key forward to take the game by the scruff of the neck against a team with a perceived lack of key defenders. Instead we got a 3 mark/1 goal game and he was largely invisible in that critical last quarter.

A pity BBB won't be playing at his suited venue - one would assume.

30 minutes ago, leave it to deever said:

Bb was unjustly dropped after three

Bb//A

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 150 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Haha
    • 111 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 32 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Like
    • 252 replies