Jump to content

Featured Replies

15 hours ago, Rab D Nesbitt said:

The Children's Hospital have just announced they'll be holding an appeal for North Melbourne next easter. 

Each year I have my 'quote of the year". This is the winner for 2021 so far, by the length of the Flemington Straight.

Love your style Rab.  

 
13 hours ago, Better days ahead said:

A decent game this between the Crows and the Suns. Both teams have improved a lot. Adelaide will be tough to beat when we play them over there.

The footy has been great this year. Kudos to the rules committee and the coaches for getting back to what we love about the game. Long may it last.

 
13 minutes ago, Jontee said:

Is Mark Neeld coaching North?

Not really fair on Noble given the task he has taken on,  I hope he was very clear upfront on what was going to happen after their purge and the board stick with their plan.  Though to be honest its a crap plan and does not work in the modern AFL work, as we are the perfect case study of it.  It simply destroys the culture of the playing group and they forget how to win, eventually it destroys player potential. 

2 minutes ago, Darkhorse72 said:

Not really fair on Noble given the task he has taken on,  I hope he was very clear upfront on what was going to happen after their purge and the board stick with their plan.  Though to be honest its a crap plan and does not work in the modern AFL work, as we are the perfect case study of it.  It simply destroys the culture of the playing group and they forget how to win, eventually it destroys player potential. 

something strange went on with North late last year. Shaw's unfortunate departure seemed to unleash a rash of barely understandable delistings.

Rebuilds just don't work anymore simply because the draft is so compromised and drafting itself is so imprecise.

Logically the only way out is Tassie and a load of priority picks...not even sure that path is still open.

Even as a merger for another team they offer very little


6 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

Richmond versus Sydney will be a belter, I rate the Swans very highly (that’s what happens when you can cherry pick talent through an academy).

Yeah they lose the COLA to supposedly even things up and then they get gifted all the best NSW talent which is a way bigger advantage than the COLA.   

Just searched GA tickets for Tigers v Swans match out of curiosity.

Only availability is top deck Ponsford stand and one section on the Southern stand wing where you could buy single tickets

Will be interested to see final crowd numbers

 
On 3/28/2021 at 11:04 PM, Wadda We Sing said:

I hate it when we are favourites.....

Need to learn to cope. 
After all to be at the top you need to beat those below.  

A bit like saying the team that finishes top has had an easier draw, because they only play teams below then, whilst the 18th only play teams above them ?


14 hours ago, willmoy said:

If he's not sooking, he's looking at himself. Skips around like a big fairy

Who are you referring to?

Swans should be up by more. Missed some getable goals. 

Good to see them resting Buddy to get him right to take on the bummers next week. 

I'll take Sydney seriously if they keep this up.

Don't currently rate their wins vs Brisbane (didn't show up in Round 1) or Adelaide (still a bottom 10 side). 

Having said that, there don't really appear to be too many bad sides this year. North obviously is appalling, as bad as anything we've seen since us in 2013. Essendon looks bad too. But who else is a bottom 4 contender? GWS? Hawthorn? Carlton?

20 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Check out the Dogs draw.  Made the finals last year, got gifted the #1 pick in the draft and then on top of it get the easiest draw you will ever see.

They have repeat games against Port Adelaide, West Coast, Gold Coast, us and North. They've still got six interstate trips and a trip to Geelong. Not sure it's the "easiest" at all. 


Meanwhile the advantage rule is broken IMO. So many umpires wait to see if the team who takes advantage retains possession and if they don't, they recall it. That's not how the rule works. If you take it, and immediately turn it over, bad luck.

Case in point just now: Sydney had a free, player picked it up and kicked it, turned it over, so the umpire called it back and that gave Sydney a new possession and a goal.

26 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

I'll take Sydney seriously if they keep this up.

 

They should have been taken seriously since round one, they still have a core of star players and a host of academy players.

Just switched over from the womens game..

Wow. Is there a changing of the guard underway?


We should take credit for Sydney’s rise. Round 15, 2020 we played them into form.

Swans killing them.   They stuck with John Longmire for the rebuild and it looks like the payoff will be tremendous.

 

Edited by Pickett2Jackson

7 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

They should have been taken seriously since round one, they still have a core of star players and a host of academy players.

As I said, Brisbane didn't show up in Round 1 and Adelaide is still Adelaide.

It's easy to get carried away when a younger/rejuvenated squad starts a season well but it wouldn't have been surprising at all for them to slump today.

The fact that they're not means they deserve to be rated.

Richmond are getting pantsed in the middle and it's not just because Prestia is injured. No midfield pressure on Sydney means they can take their pick of forward half options, and that's without Franklin in the side.

It's incredible that Tom Hickey is playing well. A journeyman in every sense of the word.

 

Sydney's next two are Essendon and GWS.

Even if they lose this from here, you'd expect them to be 4-1. 

Their repeat games are GWS, Essendon, Fremantle, St Kilda and Gold Coast. Really, really favourable list there, which happens when you finish bottom 4 I suppose.

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 0 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 134 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 421 replies