Jump to content
  • Podcast:      

george_on_the_outer

Wait for this to be rorted!

Recommended Posts

Talk that Collingwood are working out a settlement to rid them of Beams and clear up cap space for this year and next. Apparently this could free up $1.5m

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Talk that Collingwood are working out a settlement to rid them of Beams and clear up cap space for this year and next. Apparently this could free up $1.5m

Is it any different to the Lamumba situation, where we were denied any 'get out'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, FireInTheBennelly said:

Is it any different to the Lamumba situation, where we were denied any 'get out'?

Yes, our president doesn't have a radio show where he can s*** all over the AFL management if he doesn't get his way.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

Yes, our president doesn't have a radio show where he can s*** all over the AFL management if he doesn't get his way.

Hah-hah! Another slice of accuracy from MR!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

AFL also later clarified that the contract of any free agent move must be paid out in full even if the player retired, this doesn't apply to any other contracts, it started with buddy but now applies to all free agents 

Edited by Garbo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still don’t see the issue.

We paid out Colin Garland when both parties agreed to terms.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Still don’t see the issue.

We paid out Colin Garland when both parties agreed to terms.

Did he free up $1.5m space?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Still don’t see the issue.

We paid out Colin Garland when both parties agreed to terms.

I think the difference is that while there is a formula for paying out injured players as to how much goes into which salary cap it gets murky with long term contracts such as Franklin. Not sure about Beams but it is a discretionary exercise for the AFL.

Rance was of course different. Whatever he was paid went into the salary cap. May have been some discussion over amounts into different year's caps

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Will the Salary Cap survive this issue, long term?

I must be dumb - I still cannot see the rort here.

If player A has 2 years left on his contract at $500K per year. He retires and club pay him out $250K for this year.

Surely the club has the right to add $250K to their payment purse this year and $500K next year?

Could someone please explain the issue here? As I said, I must be dumb

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Did he free up $1.5m space?

Was he due to be paid 1.5m?

6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

I think the difference is that while there is a formula for paying out injured players as to how much goes into which salary cap it gets murky with long term contracts such as Franklin. Not sure about Beams but it is a discretionary exercise for the AFL.

Rance was of course different. Whatever he was paid went into the salary cap. May have been some discussion over amounts into different year's caps

The issue with free agents - most particularly restricted free agents - is that you could offer them a huge contract with no intention of ever paying it so their existing team doesn't match it. So for cap purposes that amount has to be locked in to stop that loop hole. 

To pay someone out in different years they have to stay on the list (main or rookie). You can't just kick money to future years without holding a list spot. Someone like Rance retiring on his own accord will have the contract changed for the year in which they retired and that should be it. Rance has a list spot for this year, he's settled on an amount to get paid for his 2 months or so work, maybe with some extra for being a loyal servant and that's done. Beams is likely more complicated because he seems to have physical and mental issues as well as possibly concerns over behaviour, but if they reach a settlement to pay him less to not play then that's fine.

5 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Will the Salary Cap survive this issue, long term?

Yes. It's called a salary cap, if players are retiring and agreeing to part ways with money owed (in return for retiring) then they are giving up salary. Logical that the cap reflects what players have agreed to settle for rather than hold clubs to a salary that will never be paid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, Neil Crompton said:

I must be dumb - I still cannot see the rort here.

If player A has 2 years left on his contract at $500K per year. He retires and club pay him out $250K for this year.

Surely the club has the right to add $250K to their payment purse this year and $500K next year?

Could someone please explain the issue here? As I said, I must be dumb

You watch Clubs will back end a final contract to an older player, and extra cap will be available for the following year. 
the Power Clubs will rort this black and Blue

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

 

Yes. It's called a salary cap, if players are retiring and agreeing to part ways with money owed (in return for retiring) then they are giving up salary. Logical that the cap reflects what players have agreed to settle for rather than hold clubs to a salary that will never be paid.

You are missing the point. 
Clubs will be writing ✍️ contracts for older players with this scenario as the Template. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That was my point DS. 

The Pies poach a star on big coin back ended, but when it turns sour they aim to ditch the player so as to use the coin elsewhere.

I would prefer the AFL not agree to this as it clearly favours larger clubs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

That was my point DS. 

The Pies poach a star on big coin back ended, but when it turns sour they aim to ditch the player so as to use the coin elsewhere.

I would prefer the AFL not agree to this as it clearly favours larger clubs

Careful rorting could create a huge war chest for clubs, if this goes through, look out. 
Anyone over 28-29 will be on huge back ended coin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neil Crompton said:

I must be dumb - I still cannot see the rort here.

If player A has 2 years left on his contract at $500K per year. He retires and club pay him out $250K for this year.

Surely the club has the right to add $250K to their payment purse this year and $500K next year?

Could someone please explain the issue here? As I said, I must be dumb

The rort:

"How are we going to lure de Goey from the Pies? They're offering him 5 mil over 6 years. And WCE are offering 6 mil over 7. We can't match that."

"We'll offer 12 mil over 8 years. His management won't be able to sign fast enough."

"Sure, but we can't afford that!"

"No, but we can afford 4 mil over 8 years. We'll back end the 12 mil, and when he's old and useless we'll pay out half a mil and won't have to wear the rest on our salary cap."

 

---

If "player A" is Alex Neal-Bullen, no one is going to upset at us getting an extra 250K back on our cap. People will get upset when "player A" is a star player that clubs will throw ridiculous money at without having to live with the consequences.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

The rort:

"How are we going to lure de Goey from the Pies? They're offering him 5 mil over 6 years. And WCE are offering 6 mil over 7. We can't match that."

"We'll offer 12 mil over 8 years. His management won't be able to sign fast enough."

"Sure, but we can't afford that!"

"No, but we can afford 4 mil over 8 years. We'll back end the 12 mil, and when he's old and useless we'll pay out half a mil and won't have to wear the rest on our salary cap."

 

---

If "player A" is Alex Neal-Bullen, no one is going to upset at us getting an extra 250K back on our cap. People will get upset when "player A" is a star player that clubs will throw ridiculous money at without having to live with the consequences.

Absolutely. It will become the new standard in writing contracts. 
suprised it has taken this long to become an issue 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Moonshadow said:

Did he free up $1.5m space?

Again, that's irrelevant.

Free agents are a different case and, as has already been clarified, Sydney is not allowed to pay out Franklyn's contract early and his entire salary will be included in the cap.

This is simple list management - if a players wants to quit or the club wants them out, you pay them out.  I imagine if KK succumbs to his concussion injuries this year and decides to retire, do you honestly expect our club to pay out the remaining years of his contract in full or would you want to see a reduced settlement??

Jumping at shadows.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Mazer Rackham said:

The rort:

"How are we going to lure de Goey from the Pies? They're offering him 5 mil over 6 years. And WCE are offering 6 mil over 7. We can't match that."

"We'll offer 12 mil over 8 years. His management won't be able to sign fast enough."

"Sure, but we can't afford that!"

"No, but we can afford 4 mil over 8 years. We'll back end the 12 mil, and when he's old and useless we'll pay out half a mil and won't have to wear the rest on our salary cap."

 

---

If "player A" is Alex Neal-Bullen, no one is going to upset at us getting an extra 250K back on our cap. People will get upset when "player A" is a star player that clubs will throw ridiculous money at without having to live with the consequences.

Free agent contracts are locked in to the cap to stop that situation happening.

Your example is also missing about 7.5 million dollars worth of money! 

Players can only get paid what goes in the cap, so whilst managers might agree to longer term deals like Buddy's and some back-loading of pay to join a good club (like Tom Lynch's) they aren't going to sign deals that will pay their clients peanuts and see them retire with huge sums of money unpaid.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

You are missing the point. 
Clubs will be writing ✍️ contracts for older players with this scenario as the Template. 

Go offer Max Gawn a new contract extension at 500k a year for 5 years and then 1.5 million a year when he's 33. His manager will laugh in your face.

Players aren't going to defer their payments until they are older and likely to retire any more than any of us would if our bosses suddenly wanted to pay us half as much now and the rest if we still are up to working at 70.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Go offer Max Gawn a new contract extension at 500k a year for 5 years and then 1.5 million a year when he's 33. His manager will laugh in your face.

Players aren't going to defer their payments until they are older and likely to retire any more than any of us would if our bosses suddenly wanted to pay us half as much now and the rest if we still are up to working at 70.

They will do it. Contracts will be longer

Year 1 Front loaded and then progressively Back ended for a “Final” contract  some players will see the contract through, they win, but most won’t

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The AFL has set a precedent already in these situations that the contract still counts towards the salary cap.  It would be a stretch, even for them, to not at least count his entire salary for this year.  After that becomes more debatable. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone seriously think the AFL will hold the Swans to all of Buddy's contract if he retires early? Of course they say they will, but as we know, Gil is a fluid fella when it comes to rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Mazer Rackham said:

The rort:

"How are we going to lure de Goey from the Pies? They're offering him 5 mil over 6 years. And WCE are offering 6 mil over 7. We can't match that."

"We'll offer 12 mil over 8 years. His management won't be able to sign fast enough."

"Sure, but we can't afford that!"

"No, but we can afford 4 mil over 8 years. We'll back end the 12 mil, and when he's old and useless we'll pay out half a mil and won't have to wear the rest on our salary cap."

Your scenario on page 1 was feasible but this is fantasy land. If I'm the player I demand you pay me the money when I'm old and useless.  It's a contract, I'm fine with spending 3 years in the rehab group on full pay.  You can delist me but you have to pay me out the full whack.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

Your scenario on page 1 was feasible but this is fantasy land. If I'm the player I demand you pay me the money when I'm old and useless.  It's a contract, I'm fine with spending 3 years in the rehab group on full pay.  You can delist me but you have to pay me out the full whack.

... or promise me an assistant coaching role or set me up with a good job outside of football, which won't come from the salary cap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Social Media

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles

    SUNSMART by George on the Outer

    If you don’t want to get sunburnt, you follow the Sunsmart rules.  Melbourne took the advice and with their season on the line, avoided getting burnt by the Gold Coast Suns, with a gripping 17 point win. It was a match that could have gone either way, with the sides within a kick of each other for all but the final minutes of the final quarter. Melbourne had stretched the lead earlier in the game to 18 points, but that quickly evaporated to a neck and neck race to the finish.  Finally,

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    NORTH OF THE BORDER by The Oracle

    The outcomes of Melbourne’s recent games against the Gold Coast Suns are a pretty good barometer of how the teams are faring. The Demons easily accounted for them twice in 2018, the last win being a 96-point cakewalk at the MCG in Round 20 when they scored a whopping 21.17.143 to 7.5.47. Ironically, Melbourne’s score of 9.3.57 at the first break that afternoon is leading its highest score for a full game to date this year by 3 points. In those days, they played fast, skillful football, moved th

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 5

    PACK YOUR BAGS by George on The Outer

    The scene was captured by the TV camera’s before the match with a view of the Melbourne side’s bags packed next to the team bus to facilitate their flight up north to the AFL hub where they will play their next matches. However, on the basis of the efforts against Richmond, unless things change, and change rapidly, there will be some who will be told to pack their bags on a more permanent basis. Once again, the supporters got much the same story from this match against Richmond, as

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    SOUTH OF THE BORDER by the Oracle

    Thankfully they moved this week’s game from Sydney where the sun shines and the virus breeds ever so slowly and almost nobody returns a positive test. The change of fixture comes at precisely the right time to allow everyone in town to head to the MCG on Sunday at around 3:30pm, not to catch up with what’s going on inside the ground but rather, to do what’s fashionable for woke folk in 2020 — pulling down statues. It’s time for Kevin Bartlett and Leigh Matthews to go but you can’t touch Norm Smi

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    LESSONS IN LOSING by George on the Outer

    Turn up for the game and look like you want to win it.  Melbourne lost this game to Geelong, a game after a couple of extended breaks, looking like they were at the end of a 22 game season. Right from the start there was a lack of intensity across the board, as the Demons played exactly the type of game that the ageing Geelong list wanted. Geelong repeatedly played possession footy, to avoid having to run those ageing legs, something that Melbourne failed to exploit.  To use the oft quot

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    QUARRANTINO by Whispering Jack

    At a little after 4.00pm last Saturday, the MCG ceased to be the centre of the AFL universe. That was when the AFL’s el supremo Gil McLaughlin announced that the Bombers’ Conor McKenna had returned a COVID-19 positive result and declared that the game set for the following day between Essendon and Melbourne was postponed.  What followed was truly the stuff of a pulp fiction novel. We witnessed a suitcase load of mental gymnastics and spin calculated to let McKenna (and the Essendon Football

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    WHADDA WE SING? by Whispering Jack

    When the Melbourne team sang “The Grand Old Flag” last Saturday at Marvel Stadium in the absence of skipper Max Gawn, Ed Langford and Adam Tomlinson who were first time winners at their new club and Jayden Hunt, the leading goal kicker of the day it was passed off as an honest mistake. Taken in isolation, it most probably was accidental but the problem is that little accidents have been happening far too often in the club’s recent history and, in this case, it was symptomatic not only of a day t

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    A POINT OF DIFFERENCE by George on the Outer

    It was Melbourne v Carlton at the comics stadium; a game between 16 and 17 in 2019. How could anyone pick a winner?  There had to be a point of difference, and so it would prove to be as the Demons literally fell over the line at the end, by a solitary point. In an almost complete replica of the Richmond v Collingwood game two nights previously, one of the sides (Melbourne in this case) rushed out to a five goal lead in the first quarter, while the Blues failed to bother the goal umpir

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    EXPOSED FORM by The Oracle

    Carlton fancies itself to beat Melbourne at Marvel Stadium on Saturday and, based on exposed form, why not? The Blues took it right up to the reigning premiers in their last up start and the Demons were simply horrible against the Eagles at Optus Stadium. That opening game of the season revived all of the nightmares of 2019 for a team that went inside the 50 metre arc 45 times, an advantage of 10 times over the home side and yet lost by almost five goals. Such statistics sum it up for a gam

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    SOCIAL DISTANCING by George on the Outer

    It was good to see the MFC players practicing the directives about social distancing at the game against West Coast.  Pity was that they continued to do so after the first bounce of the ball, as they allowed numerous WCE players run around un-hindered, with not a Melbourne player within 1.5 metres of them! They then found themselves looking at nearly a 5 goal deficit at the first break, which was to be essentially the final margin for the game. It is difficult to judge exactly what is going

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

    BEST IN SHOW by Whispering Jack

    I am writing this knowing that the AFL has deemed that the opening round of competition will proceed but fully believing that it should not.  The world is going through cataclysmic change as a result of the overwhelming spread of the Covid-19 virus and I agree that a distraction like sport would be good for the public. However, while the physical threat to the population is bad enough, there are other  issues to be addressed including the mental health of the community and the effects on th

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews

    TASSIE DEVILS by Van Demon

    If you were looking for something new from the Demons that wasn’t there last year, you didn’t have to look further than the perfectly trimmed grass surface of UTAS Stadium last night as the team steamrolled the Hawks to record a comprehensive 32-point victory to complete their Marsh Community Series commitments for 2020. One new thing was the fact that for the second Marsh game in a row, the team finished full of running and they dominated the second half without the presence or the dominan

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports

×
×
  • Create New...