Jump to content

What Makes a De$tination Club?

pewpewpew
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Dollars?

Premiership Window?

Chance to help develop and build a list?

Are we no longer a Destination club because we don't have the $$$ or the picks to throw around?

There are some big names bandied about, (Gaff, Shiel) but none of them want to play for the Dees. Why?

I'm not counting Steven May because his priority seems to be to desperately get out of the Suns rather than specifically go to the Dees.

So is there such a thing as a destination club or does the timing of $$$ and picks have to be right to be considered one?

  • Quote
    •  

    A destination club is a status that enables clubs to get big, important players onto their list for little financial expense, because they have nominated the club as their choice destination. Invariably, the deal gets done.

    Having lots of money to throw around usually means you don't have the stars, otherwise you'd be paying those stars.

    Edited by A F
    As SWYL says below... yes, being in your premiership window is a significant factor at play too.

  • Quote
    •  
    • Author
    10 minutes ago, A F said:

    A destination club is a status that enables clubs to get big, important players onto their list for little financial expense, because they have nominated the club as their choice destination. Invariably, the deal gets done.

    Having lots of money to throw around usually means you don't have the stars, otherwise you'd be paying those stars.

    So are we no longer perceived as a destination club?

    Gaff is either chasing dollars or thinks North are better placed at a Premiership tilt. He obviously wants to come home but what is his other motivation.

    If Shiel is choosing the Blues then his decision is purely cash based.

    Why not choose the Dees? I'd play for us given ability and the choice and I'm not biased at all.

    Edited by pewpewpew

  • Quote

    this year apparently it is:  missing the 8 and throwing buckets of money around

    potentially: Hannebery, Shiel, gaff. Polec, Hogan etc

    seems to be a shift from glory hunters to money grabbers

  • Quote

    Interesting topic and I am not sure of the answer.

    As a related question do clubs have different characters or are they merely one homogeneous group such as the world's shopping malls.

    If I was a player at the top end I would be motivated by the crowds (they are entertainers after all) and the team environment whatever that  means.

    Certainly winning but perhaps more importantly not constantly losing would be relevant.

    Whatever makes a destination club I am sure that the MFC is not one at present.

  • Quote
    38 minutes ago, pewpewpew said:

    So are we no longer perceived as a destination club?

    Gaff is either chasing dollars or thinks North are better placed at a Premiership tilt. He obviously wants to come home but what is his other motivation.

    If Shiel is choosing the Blues then his decision is purely cash based.

    Why not choose the Dees? I'd play for us given ability and the choice and I'm not biased at all.

    Because as I say, having lots of money to throw around usually means you don't have the stars, otherwise you're paying those stars.

    North and Carlton are both outside the 8 and are purely attracting players with cash.

    The problem/danger of this is that you put your list structure/payment structures out of whack and it hurts you big time down the line.

    Edited by A F

  • Quote
    • Author
    1 minute ago, A F said:

    Because as I say, having lots of money to throw around usually means you don't have the stars, otherwise you're paying those stars.

    North and Carlton are both outside the 8 and are purely attracting players with cash.

    It does seem to be the case of cash making a club a destination club.

    I think we were all fooling ourselves that we were a destination club due to the direction that we were heading in.

  • Quote
    •  

    There's no such thing as a destination club, that's just media BS to hype up whatever agenda their trying to get through at the time. Each year there are more than 30 players (normally a lot more) who change clubs, either through trades or free agency, some are superstars some have other uses (role player, depth etc.).

    Given the media is currently driven by a heap of people trying to stay relevant to stay employed - Kane Cornes, Dal Santo, McClure, Llyod, etc, etc. They throw up terms like destination club, even if it's just getting a role player like J.Lewis for us a couple of year back, not downgrading Lewis' contribution (overall not in the prelim), but he was no longer a star when he came to us, but has been more than handy. 

  • Quote

    Yeah, see, I don't think North are a destination club just because they're paying way above the market value to attract players. That's not how I'd define 'destination club'.

    Edited by A F

  • Quote

    2 minutes ago, Red and Blue realist said:

    There's no such thing as a destination club, that's just media BS to hype up whatever agenda their trying to get through at the time. Each year there are more than 30 players (normally a lot more) who change clubs, either through trades or free agency, some are superstars some have other uses (role player, depth etc.).

    Given the media is currently driven by a heap of people trying to stay relevant to stay employed - Kane Cornes, Dal Santo, McClure, Llyod, etc, etc. They throw up terms like destination club, even if it's just getting a role player like J.Lewis for us a couple of year back, not downgrading Lewis' contribution (overall not in the prelim), but he was no longer a star when he came to us, but has been more than handy. 

    Hawthorn 08-17 got every player they wanted I think. First miss was Tom Lynch. All without paying big money.

    Plenty of teams wanted Burgoyne, Hale, Gunston, O’Rourke, Frawley, Mitchell, O’Meara. They all chose the Hawks. That’s a destination club.

    They had the list, the coach, proven premiership success and medical/fitness staff to develop players.

    Getting the guys you want without having to pay top dollar is a huge advantage.

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Paying extra cash is what non-destination clubs do to be competitive with destination clubs

  • Quote

    A club players don’t want to go to unless they’re asked, because they’d struggle to get a game... ;)

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    13 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    Hawthorn 08-17 got every player they wanted I think. First miss was Tom Lynch. All without paying big money.

    Plenty of teams wanted Burgoyne, Hale, Gunston, O’Rourke, Frawley, Mitchell, O’Meara. They all chose the Hawks. That’s a destination club.

    They had the list, the coach, proven premiership success and medical/fitness staff to develop players.

    Getting the guys you want without having to pay top dollar is a huge advantage.

    Naturally it's a lot easier to get players in when you are successful, a lot of players will sacrifice $ for the chance of a premiership. Does that make you a destination club or just a successful one? If Hawthorn crash and burn from here will they still be a 'destination club' in 3/4 years, who knows, plus there's heaps they have also been linked with but never went there, just Lynch is the biggest this year - Carlisle, Prestia, Wines, Wingard etc. 

    What I was saying is that destination club is a term used by ordinary media performers to hype up any club doing a trade (if it suits their narrative at the time), we became a destination club because we got Lewis, last year Essendon and Port were because they got a few in. Nth, Brissy, Freo, Saints are apparently this years destination clubs.

  • Quote

    Who knows? The media seem to be raven on about nuff melbourne, paper bags mob, and of course methodon so far this trade period, which makes me want to use one of those calscum paper bags and? in it

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    18 minutes ago, Red and Blue realist said:

    Naturally it's a lot easier to get players in when you are successful, a lot of players will sacrifice $ for the chance of a premiership. Does that make you a destination club or just a successful one? If Hawthorn crash and burn from here will they still be a 'destination club' in 3/4 years, who knows, plus there's heaps they have also been linked with but never went there, just Lynch is the biggest this year - Carlisle, Prestia, Wines, Wingard etc. 

    What I was saying is that destination club is a term used by ordinary media performers to hype up any club doing a trade (if it suits their narrative at the time), we became a destination club because we got Lewis, last year Essendon and Port were because they got a few in. Nth, Brissy, Freo, Saints are apparently this years destination clubs.

    Certainly a vastly overused term.

    But I think the Hawks up until this year were a club that players were very keen to get to. They didn't have to sell themselves to recruits, they had recruits coming to them.

    I also think the dynamics have changed over the last 18 months with North going really hard at big names and the Tom Boyd deal not exactly crippling the Dogs. Lower teams were previous afraid to make big moves that could hurt their salary caps in the years to come. With the salary cap rising quickly the bottom teams can offer huge money and not worry too much about the depth of their list. 

    When everyone was offering similar money the top clubs and the big off field clubs had a huge advantage. 

  • Quote
    28 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    Certainly a vastly overused term.

    But I think the Hawks up until this year were a club that players were very keen to get to. They didn't have to sell themselves to recruits, they had recruits coming to them.

    I also think the dynamics have changed over the last 18 months with North going really hard at big names and the Tom Boyd deal not exactly crippling the Dogs. Lower teams were previous afraid to make big moves that could hurt their salary caps in the years to come. With the salary cap rising quickly the bottom teams can offer huge money and not worry too much about the depth of their list. 

    When everyone was offering similar money the top clubs and the big off field clubs had a huge advantage. 

    Successful clubs have always got the best of the players who move - Danger to Geel, Buddy to Swans, Lynch to Tigs etc. I don't think the lower clubs were afraid to make moves, the issue was that players choose the most successful clubs.

    It's a big issue in the equalisation the AFL wants, often lower clubs have to pay a lot more for NQR's just to met salary cap demands, I remember someone connect with the club once saying with Dawes contract that we had to pay someone.

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, pewpewpew said:

    Dollars?

    Premiership Window?

    Chance to help develop and build a list?

    Are we no longer a Destination club because we don't have the $$$ or the picks to throw around?

    There are some big names bandied about, (Gaff, Shiel) but none of them want to play for the Dees. Why?

    I'm not counting Steven May because his priority seems to be to desperately get out of the Suns rather than specifically go to the Dees.

    So is there such a thing as a destination club or does the timing of $$$ and picks have to be right to be considered one?

    Facilities would play a part too I would think.

  • Quote

    1. Premiership window 

    2. Respected coach and line coaches whom the player feels will help them reach their potential 

    3. Off field stability, reputation for integrity

    4. Opportunity to play in front of large crowds in blockbuster games 

    5. Quality of training facilities 

     

    Edited by EnterTheDragon

  • Quote
    • Like 2
     
    30 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Still don't think we have got a top FA yet.

    We haven't. But the top line guys so far have been Buddy, Frawley (just), Lynch and Gaff (overpriced).

    Buddy and Lynch were head and shoulders above the rest.

    I'm not convinced Goddard or Dal Santo were top liners when they moved. Higgins and Waite weren't. Dale Thomas wasn't. Eddie Betts not really either, although a huge success.

    May, Neale, Shiel and Wingard are the best players from next years crop of free agents - the so called pre agents - and all 4 might be traded this year. Clubs don't want to go through the uncertainty.

  • Quote
    14 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

    We haven't. But the top line guys so far have been Buddy, Frawley (just), Lynch and Gaff (overpriced).

    Buddy and Lynch were head and shoulders above the rest.

    I'm not convinced Goddard or Dal Santo were top liners when they moved. Higgins and Waite weren't. Dale Thomas wasn't. Eddie Betts not really either, although a huge success.

    May, Neale, Shiel and Wingard are the best players from next years crop of free agents - the so called pre agents - and all 4 might be traded this year. Clubs don't want to go through the uncertainty.

    Higgins was a very good get by the Roos.

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

        • Thanks
      • 61 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 300 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All