Jump to content

Featured Replies

4 minutes ago, Leoncelli_36 said:

? these blokes are literally just making it up on the run

They just talk for the sake of talking. It is incredible really, I wonder how much they are getting paid for this c*rap?

Dal Santo yesterday saying Tyson is a good user on the outside.... seriously no idea! He's an inside mid with questionable disposal who's been forced to play on the wing.

McClure suggesting Hogan isn't worth two first round picks when he is one of the best young key forwards in the game.....

I'd suggest stop listening and giving them air time.

 
5 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Agree with this and others above - 1 x First Rounder (even plus scraps) is way unders

I just find it interesting that the sentiment is so far progressed to him being gone, even from Mahoney saying ball is completely in Jesse's court. Couple this with Freo having limited draft pick currency and aspirations for Lobb and/or others this year. I feel I'm missing something, or the deal is not all that feasible givem Freo's position.

If I'm missing something, what is it?

I really think we see an opportunity to really balance our list & push for a flag in the near future if we move on Hogan now. We probably know he is leaving next contract and don't see the need to hang onto him for one last year. 

Mahoney can't let it seem like he is blowing his load at the opportunity moving on Hogan gives us. 

If we make it look like its his decision and we are losing a key contracted player then in theory he holds more value. 

Just my opinion however :)

 
1 minute ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Probably because the way the story is being reported, i've heard trade radio say freo may hold off a year and then Hogan can walk from melbourne. 

He is out of contract at the end of 2019 but he is not a free agent then.  Scroll back through the thread if you need verification, it has been explained a number of times.

Edited by Fifty-5

1 minute ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

Probably because the way the story is being reported, i've heard trade radio say freo may hold off a year and then Hogan can walk from melbourne. 

....but we have already established they are idiots and are just looking for something to fill 500 hours of radio time.


2 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

He is out of contract at the end of 2019 but he is not a free agent then.  Scroll back through the thread if you need verification, it has been explained a number of times.

 

1 minute ago, jnrmac said:

....but we have already established they are idiots and are just looking for something to fill 500 hours of radio time.

I am not arguing that he is a free agent... just saying why people may assume he is. People on demonland get so salty over the littlest things. 

37 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

We have a crack at the flag with Hogan in 2019, telling him it's only one more year until he's a free agent. 

 

1 minute ago, GCDee said:

I really think we see an opportunity to really balance our list & push for a flag in the near future if we move on Hogan now. We probably know he is leaving next contract and don't see the need to hang onto him for one last year. 

Mahoney can't let it seem like he is blowing his load at the opportunity moving on Hogan gives us. 

If we make it look like its his decision and we are losing a key contracted player then in theory he holds more value. 

Just my opinion however :)

and that is why we are in the market.

He has apparently said he does not want to re sign this year.

Same position with May. GCS have asked him to re sign a year in advance. He has said ... maybe ... but I want to look around first.

Imagine having him on the list next year without him being re contracted... whatever you might say it isn't ideal.

We need the MFC story for 2019 to be about success not about Hogan moving West.

 
1 minute ago, Fifty-5 said:

He is out of contract at the end of 2019 but he is not a free agent then.

Correct. 

Where this is confusing is Hogan was at the Demons in 2012 which means 8 years at the end of 2019.

BUT he was not eligible to play senior football in 2012 because he was too young with 2013 being his first eligible year.

Under current rules he is eligible for free agency after 2020 season but would need to extend his contract with Melbourne to qualify.

Melbourne definitely hold the cards in this deal so long as Hogan is OK to keep playing with Melbourne and all signs point to him not having a super firm view either way (which is good for Melbourne).

8 minutes ago, Lampers said:

Correct. 

Where this is confusing is Hogan was at the Demons in 2012 which means 8 years at the end of 2019.

BUT he was not eligible to play senior football in 2012 because he was too young with 2013 being his first eligible year.

Under current rules he is eligible for free agency after 2020 season but would need to extend his contract with Melbourne to qualify.

Melbourne definitely hold the cards in this deal so long as Hogan is OK to keep playing with Melbourne and all signs point to him not having a super firm view either way (which is good for Melbourne).

If Jesse comes back to the club and says he wants to go, is our position then severely diminished?

I think it must be. It would be much harder to keep him on the list having told us he'd prefer not to be there...

Mahoney coming out publicly and saying this seems to me to dent our bargaining position - unless the deal has been done in principal already.

Does this explain Bell seemingly moving the goal posts? If so it's a pretty good negotiating ploy, get all the cards laid bare and then drop offer.

Edited by Graeme Yeats' Mullet


16 minutes ago, Is Dom Is Good said:

They just talk for the sake of talking. It is incredible really, I wonder how much they are getting paid for this c*rap?

Dal Santo yesterday saying Tyson is a good user on the outside.... seriously no idea! He's an inside mid with questionable disposal who's been forced to play on the wing.

McClure suggesting Hogan isn't worth two first round picks when he is one of the best young key forwards in the game.....

I'd suggest stop listening and giving them air time.

Funny that's just what i did yesterday, just got so sick of them.

I’ve had a quick chat to contact at the club.

A little bit if guesswork to fill in blanks, but Hogan isn’t a standard cat. He’s a bit introverted, aloof and hard to get to know.

Just like any workplace, there is a prevailing culture and Hogan doesn’t quite fit in. So he’s probably never going to have the pull of staying to be with his boys, because he isn’t one of the boys.

The culture extends to the broader footy department and the relatively young staff that relates reasonably well to the current player group.

So this means despite his obvious talent, there is more openness from the footy department to explore options than there would be than if Hogan was “one of the boys”.

It just reinforces a footy club has far more dynamics at play than pure onfield footy ability. There are those on the inner, those on the outer, favourites, politics etc.

These dynamics play out in week to week team selection too and can explain why some guys seem to play irrespective of form, whereas others always seem one mediocre game away from getting dropped.

13 minutes ago, Lampers said:

Correct. 

Where this is confusing is Hogan was at the Demons in 2012 which means 8 years at the end of 2019.

BUT he was not eligible to play senior football in 2012 because he was too young with 2013 being his first eligible year.

Under current rules he is eligible for free agency after 2020 season but would need to extend his contract with Melbourne to qualify.

Melbourne definitely hold the cards in this deal so long as Hogan is OK to keep playing with Melbourne and all signs point to him not having a super firm view either way (which is good for Melbourne).

No. He was drafted in 2012 and was with us at Casey in 2013. His first year on the senior list was 2014.

1 minute ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

If he stays for 2019, due to Freo and Melbourne not agreeing to a trade, then what happens?

How does trading an un-contracted non-free agent work?

Exactly like Lever for us last year. 

Either a trade gets made or he nominates for the draft. 


Just now, Lord Neville X Flash said:

If he stays for 2019, due to Freo and Melbourne not agreeing to a trade, then what happens?

How does trading an un-contracted non-free agent work?

Same as trading a contracted non-FA except he can walk to the draft if no trade gets done and he doesn't want to stay with Melbourne. Risks getting picked up by someone else though. Rarely happens, I think the last was Luke Ball in 2009.

5 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

If Jesse comes back to the club and says he wants to go, is our position then severely diminished?

I think it must be. It would be much harder to keep him on the list having told us he'd prefer not to be there...

Absolutely, IF Hogan is adamant he doesn’t want to play at Melbourne then Melbourne’s hand is hurt.

But that is the case for any player at any time.

2 minutes ago, GCDee said:

Exactly like Lever for us last year. 

Either a trade gets made or he nominates for the draft. 

Exactly. We are in a strong bargaining position regardless. The only way we don't get what we want is to cave in, or Hogan chooses to go to the draft next year, which will not happen and hasn't happened since Luke Ball. We will get 2 first rounders this year or next year if Hogan wants to go to Freo and we stick to our guns.

2 minutes ago, Lampers said:

Absolutely, IF Hogan is adamant he doesn’t want to play at Melbourne then Melbourne’s hand is hurt.

But that is the case for any player at any time.

Agree, so I'm kinda surprised then that this is playing out publicly

5 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

No. He was drafted in 2012 and was with us at Casey in 2013. His first year on the senior list was 2014.

You’re right, so that puts his free agency eligibility out to end of 2021 which is even better for Melbourne.


3 minutes ago, Lampers said:

You’re right, so that puts his free agency eligibility out to end of 2021 which is even better for Melbourne.

NO

2020. because it goes by contract date, not by senior eligibility

4 minutes ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Agree, so I'm kinda surprised then that this is playing out publicly

Bit like Jack Watts last year, bit different though Watts wanted to stay but the club wanted to trade him, seems we are happy for Hogan to stay but we are unsure what he wants.  The club is a bit torn at the moment they see the benefits of trading Hogan  but also the downside is losing a very good player

Possibly outcomes, in descending order of likelihood:

1) We get the deal done for fair trade

2) we can’t get the deal done, Hogan plays for us next year and we all have another crack at the end of next season 

3) we can’t get the deal done, Hogan plays for us next year and walks at the end of the year

I honestly can’t see 3) happening. He’s had multiple opportunities to shaft the club in his time here and he never has. I believe the club will get the job done, but I equally believe Hogan won’t screw us over if we negotiate in good faith. Going to the draft is not a threat we should concern ourselves with, and hopefully that’s a message Jesse’s manager gives to Freo.

 
Just now, Nasher said:

Possibly outcomes, in descending order of likelihood:

1) We get the deal done for fair trade

2) we can’t get the deal done, Hogan plays for us next year and we all have another crack

3) we can’t get the deal done, Hogan plays for us next year and walks at the end of the year

I honestly can’t see 3) happening. He’s had multiple opportunities to shaft the club in his time here and he never has. I believe the club will get the job done, but I equally believe Hogan won’t screw us over if we negotiate in good faith. Going to the draft is not a threat we should concern ourselves with, and hopefully that’s a message Jesse’s manager gives to Freo.

equal 2) we get a poor deal but take it so as we get May

Well Trade Radio on a week before any actual trades can be done has brought about some of the worst radio ever. Like others I was on the verge of calling in but then I thought that's exactly what Hutchy wants to happen to fill in the hours. But dead set that muppet Sam Scoop McClure saying Melbourne will do that pick 5 trade for Hogan because they want May, no they wont, they will do the deal when they get two first rounders for Hogan. Then to top it off he says how Essendon will need to give up this years and next years first round pick for Shiel but look out Carlton will get Shiel for just next years first round pick what an idiot.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 10

    The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Thanks
    • 53 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 9 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 188 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 53 replies
    Demonland