Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 minute ago, Fifty-5 said:

He was clearly either injured or sick.  Get off his back!

Why then would you not play someone who is neither injured nor sick ? 

 
3 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Why then would you not play someone who is neither injured nor sick ? 

Because our next best would have probably delivered less.  With Viney out it was important he played.  Who would you have brought in for him?

 
15 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Jones across half back to replace either Lewie or Bernie. 

Half backs need to be able to hit targets these days.
A skill Jones struggles with.
Which is why he loves the inside 50 stat.
Huge target.

23 minutes ago, Nasher said:

Those guys were all still playing AFL grade footy - North were trying to help correct the age imbalance on their list, ie push it in the direction of youth to avoid severe pain down the track once they decided they weren’t a premiership threat. We’re still on the youthful side of perfect when it comes to that balance, although we are approaching thr sweet spot now, so there is no need for us to start cutting away experience that still has some meat on the bones at this stage. I expect Jones to be around for another 4 years at least.

Players like Vince who are clearly now on the slippery slope are a different story, but I wouldn’t put that in the category of “tough call”.

Four years might be a stretch, but after this year, he needs to change his role to become a permanent forward pocket to see out his time


27 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

He was clearly either injured or sick.  Get off his back!

Amen. People on here need to settle down and not be in such a rush to kill off one of the best Demons ever.

5 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Four years might be a stretch, but after this year, he needs to change his role to become a permanent forward pocket to see out his time

I imagine that if we land a Gaff or similar player that may just be on the horizon for Jones. 

4 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Amen. People on here need to settle down and not be in such a rush to kill off one of the best Demons ever.

Hyperbole much

Transition into a new role - you know it makes sense

 

Seeing the combination of Brayshaw, Oliver and Petracca dominating the centre clearances and streaming us forward in the third quarter really hit home why we were so bad for so long.

We had Jones as our only capable mid for years , and he was always at best a B grader.

We now have a fleet of young A graders in the midfield.  

So we play the sick and/or  injured now ? Irregardless ?

Strange days


40 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

Because our next best would have probably delivered less.  With Viney out it was important he played.  Who would you have brought in for him?

Probably Bugg

2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Probably Bugg

Coach killer.

 

trade to Hawthorn for 3rd rounder. When Gaff comes,Ginga ninja improves no need to rely on him. Perhaps Jones could do us a favour and retire.

1 hour ago, praha said:

He has always been a one-way runner that goes through the motions. In a poor side he stood out because he was the only one that won contested ball, clearances, and disposals. For many years, some here have lauded his commitment and effort. You cannot question either. However, he has always been a limited albeit serviceable player. He is very much our Richie Vandenberg equivalent: a favourite son, stuck around in bad times and helped with the transition into a new era.

I would argue he is still comfortably top 22 on experience and opposition knowledge alone: even when not at his best as yesterday, he is still serviceable, and opposition teams are still wary of his potential. His trade value would have been at its highest in 2015, but has now reached the point of no return and will likely play out his career at Melbourne. TBH I think he would struggle to crack a spot in the midfield of any current top 8 side.

In 2015 he was 28. I agree that was probably when his public recognition peaked and when he was aconsistent stand out for Melbourne but most players hit their prime earlier, around 25.

What do you think his trade value would have been at 25 or 28?

What is a 25 year old midfielder who averages 25 disposals and 4.5 tackles worth?

I love his effort and he'll go down as a demon legend, and as someone who stuck through with us in the darkest times, but I'm not sure he was ever AFL top line.  But that's hard to say given the lack of quality on the list at the time!

I think the trip to Darwin took more out of him than anyone would have admitted, as you get older long trips and the heat would be more taxing on the aging body.


Jones to me seems to have played exactly the same game week after week throughout his career from when we were bad to now when we are better.  Robotic player who only surprises when he does something out of character like lowering his eyes to hit up a lead or yesterday when he had an under 20  possession game. Still going OK but he can’t go on forever.

Edited by america de cali

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Amen. People on here need to settle down and not be in such a rush to kill off one of the best Demons ever.

Agreed. We can’t afford to treat a club legend like Jones the way McDonald was handled.

He’s had a good year with a couple of off games recently but gee, retiring him at the end of the season is way premature 

5 minutes ago, america de cali said:

Jones to me seems to have played exactly the same game week after week throughout his career from when we were bad to now when we are better.  Robotic player who only surprises when he does something out of character like lowering his eyes to hit up a lead or yesterday when he had an under 20  possession game. 

Robot who stayed with a crap side and won 3 B & F’s.

2 hours ago, Redleg said:

Amen. People on here need to settle down and not be in such a rush to kill off one of the best Demons ever.

You've put a B grader at the top of the Best Demons Ever list.
You must be high.


3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Robot who stayed with a crap side and won 3 B & F’s.

And was rewarded with above pay for a B grader.

I'm not sure anyone is talking about retiring him but we do need to start thinking about it.  He is nearly 31 and will slow down soon, if he isn't already slowing down. So it is prudent to prepare for replacing him. 

Our headache at the moment is that we have another inside mid on the list (Tyson) who would take his spot if he left this year.  But as he will stay another year or two we'll probably lose Tyson as he seeks opportunity. That'll be a real issue if Viney also continues on/off foot injuries. We're can't afford to play without all three of them. 

Also if next year happens to be his last, then we are looking at replacing all the of Jones, Lewis and Vince in the space of 2 seasons, and we don't currently have replacements for all of them. 

After reading the OP I was expecting some backlash, I'm quiet shocked at the amount of Jones bashing going on here. The bloke is still easily in our best 22, he still offers a lot to the team & midfield. One bad game & you all want him retired... Settle down.

 
1 minute ago, Fork 'em said:

You've put a B grader at the top of the Best Demons Ever list.
You must be high.

Didn’t put him at the top of the Best Demons Ever List. I said he would be on the List. Obviously you don’t. 3 Blueys doesn’t happen every day. 

I don’t understand the venom for Jones. Some on here should be ashamed to call themselves  Demon fans. 

 

4 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Didn’t put him at the top of the Best Demons Ever List. I said he would be on the List. Obviously you don’t. 3 Blueys doesn’t happen every day. 

I don’t understand the venom for Jones. Some on here should be ashamed to call themselves  Demon fans. 

 

Exactly! Now that we’re a good team, Jones can “perhaps do us a favour and retire” FMD


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 527 replies