Jump to content

Featured Replies

I'm happy to take the advice from others on here that have spoken to Gaff's management that it is North or WCE.

In the meantime - I can't help but think though, that his choice when he makes his announcement will be based on Hogan getting to Fremantle or not...

 
1 minute ago, Danelska said:

I'm happy to take the advice from others on here that have spoken to Gaff's management that it is North or WCE.

In the meantime - I can't help but think though, that his choice when he makes his announcement will be based on Hogan getting to Fremantle or not...

expand if you would ?

 
7 minutes ago, hells bells said:

Close the thread. Mahoney mentioned that they've been told to stop asking. WCE or North

 

8 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

expand if you would ?

Well, the first language of AFL is lying... or not airing your intentions...since when has Mahoney ever been overt when it's come to bigger names coming into the club.

Not to say he is lying of course... but as someone else said...the deals are done, the rest is theatre.

So, the vibe I have is that I can't help but think that if/when Hogan goes to Freo...Gaff will shortly announce the Dee's, as his asking price is more closely matched due to more cap $ -  if the trade to Freo fails... well, who cares really...

 

Edited by Danelska

10 minutes ago, Danelska said:

I'm happy to take the advice from others on here that have spoken to Gaff's management that it is North or WCE.

In the meantime - I can't help but think though, that his choice when he makes his announcement will be based on Hogan getting to Fremantle or not...

Peak Demonland


Just now, jnrmac said:

Peak Demonland

Is that a compliment or not? ?

10 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Is that a compliment or not? ?

On what planet would Gaff base his decision to go to North or stay at WCE based on whether Hogan goes to Freo?

5 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

On what planet would Gaff base his decision to go to North or stay at WCE based on whether Hogan goes to Freo?

cap space @jnrmac

 
38 minutes ago, Danelska said:

cap space @jnrmac

You miss the point. The two are totally unrelated.

10 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

You miss the point. The two are totally unrelated.

I’m sure I read elsewhere on here that, with Hogan going it’s frees up $ for anyone - in this case Gaff who is a FA to meet an asking price.

if this is wrong - walk me through what point I am missing

TIA

 


  • Author
1 hour ago, hells bells said:

Close the thread. Mahoney mentioned that they've been told to stop asking. WCE or North

Well not quite... His comments were: 

"We don't stop asking the question, but we've been told to stay away for a fair period of time. We're reading what you guys are reading on that."

Being told to stay away for a period of time can be construed two ways.

  1. MFC has been told time and time again to F off but are annoyingly persistent, or;
  2. MFC has been advised to take a step back and let things unfold safe in the knowledge that they're still in the picture.
3 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Well not quite... His comments were: 

"We don't stop asking the question, but we've been told to stay away for a fair period of time. We're reading what you guys are reading on that."

Being told to stay away for a period of time can be construed two ways.

  1. MFC has been told time and time again to F off but are annoyingly persistent, or;
  2. MFC has been advised to take a step back and let things unfold safe in the knowledge that they're still in the picture.

hes quite clever with words is Josh  ;)

I like 2 personally

3 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Well not quite... His comments were: 

"We don't stop asking the question, but we've been told to stay away for a fair period of time. We're reading what you guys are reading on that."

Being told to stay away for a period of time can be construed two ways.

  1. MFC has been told time and time again to F off but are annoyingly persistent, or;
  2. MFC has been advised to take a step back and let things unfold safe in the knowledge that they're still in the picture.

He answered this in response to Barrett asking if he thought it was down to two, being North and WC. The end of the sentence was that, based on the above,  Melbourne are reading it the same way.

Pretty sure he was confirming that we had been told to bugger off, not let it play out. Would love to be wrong.

1 hour ago, jnrmac said:

On what planet would Gaff base his decision to go to North or stay at WCE based on whether Hogan goes to Freo?

Uranus. 

38 minutes ago, Good Lord George said:

He answered this in response to Barrett asking if he thought it was down to two, being North and WC. The end of the sentence was that, based on the above,  Melbourne are reading it the same way.

Pretty sure he was confirming that we had been told to bugger off, not let it play out. Would love to be wrong.

"Told to stay away" Interesting turn of phrase. Something feels off about this whole Gaff scenario. I know he's going through a lot, but to be completely shattered as your teammates win a premiership seemed pretty self absorbed. Couldnt put the chin up and put on a smile and be happy for teammates like nic nat? I know im playing the DL cliche of disliking those who turn us down, but Gaff has seemed like a very odd and brittle indecisive person this past week. 

 

Edited by johndemonic


  • Author
28 minutes ago, johndemonic said:

"Told to stay away" Interesting turn of phrase. Something feels off about this whole Gaff scenario. I know he's going through a lot, but to be completely shattered as your teammates win a premiership seemed pretty self absorbed. Couldnt put the chin up and put on a smile and be happy for teammates like nic nat? I know im playing the DL cliche of disliking those who turn us down, but Gaff has seemed like a very odd and brittle indecisive person this past week. 

 

Apples and Oranges.

No need to elaborate.

I’d have thought until the Eagles finished finals we (and other suitors) would have been told to “stay away”... now it’s time to mak e our play, as if he’s leaving the West as seems evident, it’s fairly likely he’d consider us a good option, assuming the numbers at North are not too insane...

Edited by PaulRB

I’ll do a desk pop if Gaff comes to us. Gaff’s manager has stated it’s between staying at West Coast and going to North. The way Mahoney’s words are being read into is amusing, he’s a straight shooter. I know it’s nice to still hold out hope Gaff may come to us but it isn’t happening. 

Edited by Ethan Tremblay

 

32 minutes ago, McQueen said:

Apples and Oranges.

No need to elaborate.

Fair enough. And ill rightly cop criticism for the harshness of my post

But let me just surmise that maybe Gaff is not the type of person that will thrive with the weight of $1.1m/yr expectations on his shoulders all the while adapting to a new environment. That might be a factor in him being indecisive currently. Time to let this one play out, happy to be wrong.

Edited by johndemonic


Gaff's manager said on Trade Radio today it's between West Coast and North. When asked if it was only those clubs, he said "yes.". We've asked, we've been told no, and now his manager says West Coast or North. There's no way we come close to matching Norths offer of 1.2 million a year for 5-6 years. Probably time to shut this thread down. The club has clearly sent their focus elsewhere since, hopefully on Shiel?

33 minutes ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I’ll do a desk pop if Gaff comes to us. Gaff’s manager has stated it’s between staying at West Coast and going to North. The way Mahoney’s words are being read into is amusing, he’s a straight shooter. I know it’s nice to still hold out hope Gaff may come to us but it isn’t happening. 

The ollllld 'desk pop'. I like it.

  • Author
9 minutes ago, Demons11 said:

About 5 years I’d say 

You’re either completely Shyte at math or haven’t bother to click on the links. 

 
13 minutes ago, McQueen said:

You’re either completely Shyte at math or haven’t bother to click on the links. 

Point 2. I actually thought there was a bigger age difference

Edited by Demons11

Two things Gaff would have seriously learnt in the last two weeks:

He's got the monkey on his back from WC/Flag, and all who sail in her, and

He's not going to readily get rid of it at North.....

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • WHAT’S NEXT? by The Oracle

    What’s next for a beleagured Melbourne Football Club down in form and confidence, facing  intense criticism and disapproval over some underwhelming recent performances and in the midst of a four game losing streak? Why, it’s Adelaide which boasts the best percentage in the AFL and has won six of its last seven games. The Crows are hot and not only that, the game is at the Adelaide Oval; yet another away fixture and the third in a row at a venue outside of Victoria. One of the problems the Demons have these days is that they rarely have the luxury of true home ground advantage, something they have enjoyed just once since mid April. 

      • Thanks
    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 174 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 231 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 41 replies