Trade rumours

[Ethan Tremblay 30,994]

4 minutes ago, Tram 74 said:

They are the picks we are about to receive for Hogan, see the earlier posts. You can do this in make believe.

Been reading Twitter have you? Hogan isn’t going anywhere. Love #ETthetradebreaker. 

Edited October 17, 2017 by Ethan Tremblay

[Tram 74 80]

How are things North of the river tradebreaker, we must catch up to vilify the other posters sometime soon.

[Gator 17,486]

7 hours ago, Tram 74 said:

Hope I’m wrong.

You hope your unsubstantiated "feelings" are wrong ?

[Wiseblood 24,637]

I'm happy to brand anyone who even remotely believes Hogan will be traded as slightly thick. 

It ain't happening. 

[Little Richard 6,265]

Wow!! This thread is bizarre.

[Moonshadow 17,677]

51 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

I'm happy to brand anyone who even remotely believes Hogan will be traded as slightly thick. 

It ain't happening. 

Ever?

[Wiseblood 24,637]

12 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

Ever?

Just for now, my good friend.  There are still a few poor souls trying to argue him being traded is still a chance in this trade period.  It just isn't happening.

[hardtack 10,637]

8 hours ago, Tram 74 said:

Part of feeling the Hogan trade may still be an option and I acknowledge it is still only a remote possibility is that Melbourne , Freo and Hogan May have known about this for some time. If so the targets for those picks may have already been identified.

Still? It never was!

[AzzKikA 2,371]

7 hours ago, Tram 74 said:

They are the picks we are about to receive for Hogan, see the earlier posts. You can do this in make believe.

So they will trade a player that literally just signed a new contract ummm ok.

[DistrACTION Jackson 9,262]

Any rumours on what we are doing from here?

Obviously Balic should get done today. Wonder if we will be packaging picks up for a player or higher pick?

[kurtneverdied 244]

Matt Thompson‏Verified account @MattThompson 1m1 minute ago

 

 

Harley Balic will officially be a Demon within minutes. His manager has just arrived at AFL HQ to sign paperwork. @AFLcomau

 

 

[Adam The God 30,431]

Gives us plenty of time to court some clubs RE: a pick upgrade with our second rounders.

Am I clinging to hope unrealistically? 

[Skuit 10,031]

12 minutes ago, A F said:

Gives us plenty of time to court some clubs RE: a pick upgrade with our second rounders.

Am I clinging to hope unrealistically? 

I'm thinking that sending #66 to Freo means that #47 is in play for the draft. Just vague speculation.

[old55 23,709]

1 hour ago, Skuit said:

I'm thinking that sending #66 to Freo means that #47 is in play for the draft. Just vague speculation.

Maybe.

Off: 6? = Watts, Lumumba, Trengove, Hulett, Kennedy, Garland?
On: 3? = Lever, Balic, J.Smith?, 29, 31, 36

Edit: This is incorrect - please see below post from LH

Edited October 18, 2017 by Fifty-5

[Skuit 10,031]

Just now, Fifty-5 said:

Maybe.

Off: 6? = Watts, Lumumba, Trengove, Hulett, Kennedy, Garland?
On: 3? = Lever, Balic, J.Smith?, 29, 31, 36

Only speculation as mentioned, but my thinking was that we would have better compensated Freo if we weren't using a later pick. Thus for the three ins: 47, a second-rounder, and something packaged. Still, I wouldn't be surprised though if we just see the #47 used in some odd positional jockeying up and down the draft order.

[DistrACTION Jackson 9,262]

10 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

Maybe.

Off: 6? = Watts, Lumumba, Trengove, Hulett, Kennedy, Garland?
On: 3? = Lever, Balic, J.Smith?, 29, 31, 36

I'd say they may be looking to do a 2 for 1 upgrade and maybe pick up a de-listed free agent as well.

[Tram 74 80]

11 minutes ago, Fifty-5 said:

Maybe.

Off: 6? = Watts, Lumumba, Trengove, Hulett, Kennedy, Garland?
On: 3? = Lever, Balic, J.Smith?, 29, 31, 36

I thought we would be able to use all 4. If we add J Smith to the list doesn’t that give us 36 and we are permitted 40.

[Lucifers Hero 40,369]

 

On 10/18/2017 at 11:46 AM, Fifty-5 said:

Maybe.

Off: 6? = Watts, Lumumba, Trengove, Hulett, Kennedy, Garland?
On: 3? = Lever, Balic, J.Smith?, 29, 31, 36

Slight update, Fifty:

 

Spencer has also left.  So 6 out (exl Garland).  J. Smith is in and we will use pick 84 for him.

So atm we have 3 list spots but 4 live picks.  

Re other poster comments, we can only use pick 47 if Garland agrees to retire before the Draft (or we delist someone else, highly unlikely as all players are contracted).

Edited August 28, 2022 by Lucifers Hero

[old55 23,709]

1 minute ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

Slight update, Fifty:

Spencer has also left.  So 6 out (exl Garland).  J. Smith is in and we will use pick 84 for him.

So atm we have 3 list spots but 4 live picks.  

Re other poster comments, we can only use pick 47 if Garland agrees to retire before the Draft (or we delist someone else, highly unlikely as all players are contracted).

OK you're absolutely correct thanks!

So I should have posted:

Off: 7? = Watts, Lumumba, Trengove, Hulett, Spencer, Kennedy, Garland?
On: 3? = Lever, Balic, J.Smith?, 29, 31, 36, 47

[Tram 74 80]

Sorry, I thought Garland was a done deal.

[Clintosaurus 7,874]

Should be asking Richmond if 29 and 31 for 15 would work.

[Sydee 4,529]

6 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Should be asking Richmond if 29 and 31 for 15 would work.

Pretty sure the two word answer would start with F and end in F

[Skuit 10,031]

7 minutes ago, Sydee said:

Pretty sure the two word answer would start with F and end in F

Fold-down sunroof?

[Bay Riffin 1,481]

5 minutes ago, Skuit said:

Fold-down sunroof?

Fair Enuff ?

[Skuit 10,031]

2 minutes ago, Bay Riffin said:

Fair Enuff ?

Fair Enuff is only one word in Richmond.