Jump to content

Welcome to Demonland: Jake Lever

stevethemanjordan
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

My only issue with the deal is that there may be a bad taste in the mouth of current players not being paid as highly as they may deserve and feeling a little annoyed about that.

  • Quote
    •  
    5 minutes ago, AzzKikA said:

    My only issue with the deal is that there may be a bad taste in the mouth of current players not being paid as highly as they may deserve and feeling a little annoyed about that.

    Listen to Mahoneys interview from yesterday, the club has a system in place to ensure players are paid accordingly. I was also concerned, but not after hearing him speak about it.

  • Quote
    Just now, SFebey said:

    Listen to Mahoneys interview from yesterday, the club has a system in place to ensure players are paid accordingly. I was also concerned, but not after hearing him speak about it.

    Thats good to know, last thing we need is backstabbing inside the club.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     
    12 hours ago, picket fence said:

    We have been screwed yet again MASSIVE MASSIVE overs for a player who is "A  better mans Oscar Mac""!

    Our negotiation and management skills are Abysmal!!

    Should have played hardball !!No gonads!! MFC

     

    it might be argued ( for no real outcome ) that possibly we blinked first and maybe a slightly better deal would result if say sorted monday or tuesday after the Crows could "sweat" it out over the weekend. But that's probably more fanciful dreaming than practical.

    Lever  went at 14 in a fairly decent draft year. He's now had THREE years of development and conditioning . He landed an AA squad possie in only his third year and leads  ( or near to ) the comp in some very demanding and impressive  areas.

    So in effect he's now a value added #14...ready to go ...( and more )  player who seems for all intents able to keep his feet , not just stay on the field :rolleyes:

    It's very easy to talk up new acquisitions I grant you that.  What we are dealing with here is an absolute known.  There's no guessing. There's no real development required. And he's good to go  NOW. The various values ever applied to Picks are notoriously wanderous in nature. All picks come under the "What If" banner., all a bit Russian Roulette  only with more chambers full..i.e NO Guarantees about anything.

    I'm not sure what playing hardball would have achieved if at the expense of playing  'clever' ball.  Often in the trade period we see deals unfold , or indeed FOLD because of time constraints. Irrespective of how long trade periods are  many will go down to the wire...and many opportunities present as things  become fragmented.

    The one aspect of Josh that impresses me ( there might be some that don't ...but that's not for here )  is his teams ability to conjure. If  i would suggest to anyone anything about trade is judge it best at the end.

    I think we've paid just about market for Jake in terms of ability, availability  and expedience of business.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    14 hours ago, waynewussell said:

    Goodwin critics are premature...

    But there's a nasal spray for that apparently......

  • Quote
    • Like 3

    19 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

    Yes agreed I said Lever would cost more than the 2100 points you predicted and I was wrong - I owe Dland a donation - that's why it's a good deal.

    Perhaps you'll also agree that your assertion that we are "up to our eyeballs" in the Stringer trade is also incorrect?

    Cheers. The Stringer trade is very important to us - now you can read into that what you want. 

  • Quote
    14 hours ago, waynewussell said:

    Goodwin critics are premature...

    Anyone can be critiqued at any time. How much weight you or anyone wished to apply to it is another thing.

    Everyone gets evaluated.

    I hope Simon holds up the Cup one day. In reality though  I just want SOMEONE to hold up that bloody cup. My little jury of one is out currently. 

    When do you think a good time might be to appraise ?  ( for me it's continuous )

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    1 minute ago, DaveyDee said:

    Cheers. The Stringer trade is very important to us - now you can read into that what you want. 

    Don't back pedal now.  You've consistently maintained that we should be and are in the market for trading Stringer in to MFC.

  • Quote
    • Like 4
     
    1 minute ago, Fifty-5 said:

    Don't back pedal now.  You've consistently maintained that we should be and are in the market for trading Stringer in to MFC.

    Not sure I went that far - I've always wished the boy well, refused to listen to the internet rumours just like Essendon & Geelong have, thought it was going to be very difficult to land him. However, we are up to our eye balls in this trade because its very important to us. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    2 minutes ago, DaveyDee said:

    Not sure I went that far - I've always wished the boy well, refused to listen to the internet rumours just like Essendon & Geelong have, thought it was going to be very difficult to land him. However, we are up to our eye balls in this trade because its very important to us. 

    backpedal.jpg

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Haha 4

    3 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

    You fail to understand a fundamental FA fact in your spurious argument about 4 years vs Macca's very reasonable "10 year player" observation.  You're the one who looks silly.

    Thanks for your input fifty. Still doesn't change the fact we have him contracted for 4 yrs on not 10. We expect he will play 10 for someone likely to be us but no certainty. Also doesn't change the fact we paid overs but not by as much as some are suggesting.

    The best player in the comp came cheaper then Lever

    The Cats have given up young midfielder Dean Gore as well as picks No.9 and No.28 to snare the superstar midfielder.

    The Cats gain Dangerfield and Adelaide's third-round draft pick, currently No.50.

    Gore was recently delisted by the way and was really just the 'steak knives'

    Edited by Demons1858

  • Quote

    For those worried about us losing out on youth by trading out the two years of first rounders. Have a look at this demographic breakdown of the list. We don't need to worry about getting youth into the list. 22 players, half the list is 23 or under. 6 20 or under. 

    Melbourne players who are 20 years and under:

    Oliver, Weideman, McKenna, King, Johnstone, Filipovic

    23-21years :

    Viney, Petracca, Hogan,  Hunt, Brayshaw, Salem, Harmes, McDonald, Stretch, ANB, JKH, Kent, Hannan, Wagner, Joel Smith and now Lever.

    24 years: Tyson Frost Bugg are 24. 

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    1 hour ago, Demons1858 said:

    Thanks for your input fifty. Still doesn't change the fact we have him contracted for 4 yrs on not 10. We expect he will play 10 for someone likely to be us but no certainty. Also doesn't change the fact we paid overs but not by as much as some are suggesting.

    The best player in the comp came cheaper then Lever

    The Cats have given up young midfielder Dean Gore as well as picks No.9 and No.28 to snare the superstar midfielder.

    The Cats gain Dangerfield and Adelaide's third-round draft pick, currently No.50.

    Gore was recently delisted by the way and was really just the 'steak knives'

    For someone so keen on the facts you are very loose with them.  You'll find that the trade for Dangerfield represented more draft points than the trade for Lever.

  • Quote
    Just now, Fifty-5 said:

    For someone so keen on the facts you are very loose with them.  You'll find that the trade for Dangerfield represented more draft points than the trade for Lever.

    Can you have an independent opinion without making references to some sort modeled points system which is a guide at best.

    Points don't consider whether the players is out of contract. Points don't take into consideration that Lever was prepared to go to the draft and put a price on his head. They don't consider their current marketing value. They don't consider their proven (not potential) leadership etc etc.

    At best, we should be paying a fair bit below what the best player in the comp is worth and it shouldn't be so line ball. Tom Mitchell was a 1st rounder for Christ sake

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    35 minutes ago, Demons1858 said:

    Can you have an independent opinion without making references to some sort modeled points system which is a guide at best.

    Points don't consider whether the players is out of contract. Points don't take into consideration that Lever was prepared to go to the draft and put a price on his head. They don't consider their current marketing value. They don't consider their proven (not potential) leadership etc etc.

    At best, we should be paying a fair bit below what the best player in the comp is worth and it shouldn't be so line ball. Tom Mitchell was a 1st rounder for Christ sake

    So I should just take your word for it?  Someone loose with the facts?

  • Quote

    48 minutes ago, It's Time said:

    For those worried about us losing out on youth by trading out the two years of first rounders. Have a look at this demographic breakdown of the list. We don't need to worry about getting youth into the list. 22 players, half the list is 23 or under. 6 20 or under. 

    Melbourne players who are 20 years and under:

    Oliver, Weideman, McKenna, King, Johnstone, Filipovic

    23-21years :

    Viney, Petracca, Hogan,  Hunt, Brayshaw, Salem, Harmes, McDonald, Stretch, ANB, JKH, Kent, Hannan, Wagner, Joel Smith and now Lever.

    24 years: Tyson Frost Bugg are 24. 

    I'm not "worried" per se - however it is the under 20 bracket which could present an issue down the track. Oliver is the only surefire one to be there in 2 years let alone 7 or 8.

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, beelzebub said:

    Anyone can be critiqued at any time. How much weight you or anyone wished to apply to it is another thing.

    Everyone gets evaluated.

    I hope Simon holds up the Cup one day. In reality though  I just want SOMEONE to hold up that bloody cup. My little jury of one is out currently. 

    When do you think a good time might be to appraise ?  ( for me it's continuous )

    Someone in red and blue of course ...  ?

  • Quote
    26 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

    I'm not "worried" per se - however it is the under 20 bracket which could present an issue down the track. Oliver is the only surefire one to be there in 2 years let alone 7 or 8.

    Fair point. But we have plenty of time to start bringing in younger players in a few years time.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Calculated risk. Hope he stays injury free and helps lead our backline for years to come! 

    Welcome Jake!

  • Quote

    Adelaide were going to take what they could get.

    Which club was going to offer anywhere near what we did?

     

    Like going to an Auction, and bidding 200K above reserve with your first bid

  • Quote
    • Like 5

    2 hours ago, It's Time said:

    For those worried about us losing out on youth by trading out the two years of first rounders. Have a look at this demographic breakdown of the list. We don't need to worry about getting youth into the list. 22 players, half the list is 23 or under. 6 20 or under. 

    Melbourne players who are 20 years and under:

    Oliver, Weideman, McKenna, King, Johnstone, Filipovic

    23-21years :

    Viney, Petracca, Hogan,  Hunt, Brayshaw, Salem, Harmes, McDonald, Stretch, ANB, JKH, Kent, Hannan, Wagner, Joel Smith and now Lever.

    24 years: Tyson Frost Bugg are 24. 

    not to mention Lever is young as well.

  • Quote
    43 minutes ago, DemonAndrew said:

    Rationalize it as 7 first round picks over 7 years and you might feel better (2012-18)

    Lever is a jet; can’t wsit to see him run out for us in round 1

    Correct.

    We have hit the first round hard over the last 4 years. 

    An A grade defender wants to come to us and some are arguing the fact that we may have paid a little over. just get the the deal done.

    2012 - Hogan, Viney*

    2013 - Salem, Tyson*

    2014 Trac, Brayshaw, Lever*

    2015 - Oliver, Weed

    Thats 9 first round draft picks into the club from the last 4 drafts. Not using one in this year or next draft isn't going to make a huge difference with what we have done and planned for the last 3-4 years.

     

  • Quote
    • Thanks 1
     
    4 hours ago, Demons1858 said:

    The best player in the comp came cheaper then Lever

    The Cats have given up young midfielder Dean Gore as well as picks No.9 and No.28 to snare the superstar midfielder.

    The Cats gain Dangerfield and Adelaide's third-round draft pick, currently No.50.

    Gore was recently delisted by the way and was really just the 'steak knives'

    Dangerfield was also a free agent. Geelong could have got him for nothing, but instead paid more than we did for Lever.

  • Quote
    • Like 6
    • Thanks 1
    1 hour ago, Bay Riffin said:

    not to mention Lever is young as well.

    He's in there as one of the U23's. He's barely out of draft age. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Clap
      • 210 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Clap
      • 47 replies
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

      After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

        • Haha
      • 330 replies
      Demonland
    View All