Jump to content

The colour RED, is it that hard?

Featured Replies

Posted

This is another one of those off-season topics that may have been touched upon before, but seriously what is with the colour red the club is using on its website and why do we seem to be stuck between two shades of it?

Yes, I realise this will be a non issue among many here, but I find it odd that our jumper colour (2015) does not match the logo and the shade used on Promotional Material. Demonland is much the same, you only need to look to the banner on the site to see that while our jumper appears to be the traditional RED the logo and pro forma all appear to be a deeper shade akin to purple.

The MFC website is much the same. The team colours are red and blue, not purple and blue. This a yet another hangover from the Schwabb era, when he tried to 'deepen' the red on the jumper without any success, as modern fabrics mad it look purple. I am still at a loss to explain why the club's website still appears to be using the purpl-ish red and Demonland for that matter?

Is it just me? or does it bother other posters too?150224_SeasonLaunchSocial.jpg

150225_1Social620x370FA.jpg

Edited by Leoncelli_36

 
 

I thought it was blue & black?

Haha, white and gold for me.


I don't like the 'purple' or more accurately 'maroon' colour.

But I certainly don't like orange style light tomato colour or the Sydney Swans style pink.

In the OP I think the branding is certainly much too maroon, but the jumper on Jonesy is just a slight too orange.

The polo shirt Roosy is wearing seems just about perfectly red. A rich, strong, deep red that is still 100% red. Like a beautiful classic ferrari.

I think the club knows what colour it wants, but getting that on to the jumper might not be as easy as it sounds. Fixing the branding is probably an issue, but I'd rather we spend money on football than worry about the website being a bit off colour.

This is another one of those off-season topics that may have been touched upon before, but seriously what is with the colour red the club is using on its website and why do we seem to be stuck between two shades of it?

Yes, I realise this will be a non issue among many here, but I find it odd that our jumper colour (2015) does not match the logo and the shade used on Promotional Material. Demonland is much the same, you only need to look to the banner on the site to see that while our jumper appears to be the traditional RED the logo and pro forma all appear to be a deeper shade akin to purple.

The MFC website is much the same. The team colours are red and blue, not purple and blue. This a yet another hangover from the Schwabb era, when he tried to 'deepen' the red on the jumper without any success, as modern fabrics mad it look purple. I am still at a loss to explain why the club's website still appears to be using the purpl-ish red and Demonland for that matter?

Is it just me? or does it bother other posters too?150224_SeasonLaunchSocial.jpg

150225_1Social620x370FA.jpg

Agree 100%. It annoys me too.

Last year the socks didn't even match the jumpers - the socks were the deeper red and the jumper the regular red. In addition, all the off-field gear (eg. media polo, coach's clothes, training gear) were the deeper red / maroon colour which didn't match the on-field jumpers.

I know it's only a little thing but it looks unprofessional in my opinion.

I personally hate that deep red colour as it didn't work. Everything came out looking maroon and more like an old Fitzroy jumper than Melbourne.

My understanding is that after people complained about the deep red jumper a few years ago, they agreed to change it back to the regular red. However, I was told that this would be the only change - the deeper red would appear on all other club merchanise.

I think club colours needs to be consistent across the board and therefore we should just do away with that awful deep red / maroon colour on everything (including logos and promotional material) and go back to the normal red that is on the current jumper and that all other teams wear.

Agree 100%. It annoys me too.

Last year the socks didn't even match the jumpers - the socks were the deeper red and the jumper the regular red. In addition, all the off-field gear (eg. media polo, coach's clothes, training gear) were the deeper red / maroon colour which didn't match the on-field jumpers.

I know it's only a little thing but it looks unprofessional in my opinion.

I personally hate that deep red colour as it didn't work. Everything came out looking maroon and more like an old Fitzroy jumper than Melbourne.

My understanding is that after people complained about the deep red jumper a few years ago, they agreed to change it back to the regular red. However, I was told that this would be the only change - the deeper red would appear on all other club merchanise.

I think club colours needs to be consistent across the board and therefore we should just do away with that awful deep red / maroon colour on everything (including logos and promotional material) and go back to the normal red that is on the current jumper and that all other teams wear.

In fairness to the club and suppliers, matching colours on fabris is not easy. However, I do agree with the sentiments and for digital artwork there should be no excuse to not get the colours right.

 

Demonland is much the same, you only need to look to the banner on the site to see that while our jumper appears to be the traditional RED the logo and pro forma all appear to be a deeper shade akin to purple.

On here I'd probably say it's because the deeper shade is a bit easier on the eyes, not as bright so makes the viewing a little better


Of course the colour you see on your screen or monitor is heavily dependent on the settings you have for them...

I won't go into the intricacies of RGB, CMYK or spot colours, or the concept of colour composition, but it is a complex subject.

Of course the colour you see on your screen or monitor is heavily dependent on the settings you have for them...

I won't go into the intricacies of RGB, CMYK or spot colours, or the concept of colour composition, but it is a complex subject.

Christ Machsy don't even mention that shite!!


I have been led to believe that we are playing in white against Freo, unconfirmed

It is a disgrace that 'away' jumper. It looks like a Saints jumper if anything. Why can't we b like Collingwood? One (distinctly unique) jumper and just change the colour of your shorts!

  • Author

I have been led to believe that we are playing in white against Freo, unconfirmed

I almost guarantee we will not wear that red jumper at all this year as the AFL and the Networks deem red to be dark, which is the greatest load of [censored] of all time.

It is a disgrace that 'away' jumper. It looks like a Saints jumper if anything. Why can't we b like Collingwood? One (distinctly unique) jumper and just change the colour of your shorts!

No, it doesn't.

melbourne-clash-2015-628.jpg

  • Author

No, it doesn't.

melbourne-clash-2015-628.jpg

You are right CB, not sure how that looks anything like the Saints jumper. It is very Carlton'esue, or a bit Fitzroy even, either way its a massive improvment on the Swans jumper we have had for the last few years

No, it doesn't.

melbourne-clash-2015-628.jpg

Ignorance alert.

Who's the bloke in the middle? I had assumed it was Jeremy Howe, but doesn't he now have a sleeve tattoo?

Back on topic. I'm not going to die in a ditch about it, but there should be a consistent colour scheme used across all products and media.


lol... four different shades of red on the homepage.

4pzjgw.jpg

I almost guarantee we will not wear that red jumper at all this year as the AFL and the Networks deem red to be dark, which is the greatest load of [censored] of all time.

I'll reckon we'll wear the red jumper against Carlton.

lol... four different shades of red on the homepage.

4pzjgw.jpg

Wow, that is outrageous....

FMD!

 

I would have thought:

Home jumper

-Collingwood, Geelong, GWS, GC, Hawthorn, North, Richmond, Sydney, Dogs

Red

-Carlton, Fremantle, St Kilda (even though I don't think we clash), Port, West Coast

White

-Adelaide, Brisbane, Essendon

I would have thought:

Home jumper

-Collingwood, Geelong, GWS, GC, Hawthorn, North, Richmond, Sydney, Dogs

Red

-Carlton, Fremantle, St Kilda (even though I don't think we clash), Port, West Coast

White

-Adelaide, Brisbane, Essendon

Would have thought Red was closer to Purple than white was


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 50 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 174 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Like
    • 32 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Haha
    • 546 replies
  • PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    The Gold Coast Suns find themselves outside of the top eight for the first time since Round 1 with pressure is mounting on the entire organisation. Their coach Damien Hardwick expressed his frustration at his team’s condition last week by making a middle-finger gesture on television that earned him a fine for his troubles. He showed his desperation by claiming that Fox should pick up the tab.  There’s little doubt the Suns have shown improvement in 2025, and their position on the ladder is influenced to some extent by having played fewer games than their rivals for a playoff role at the end of the season, courtesy of the disruption caused by Cyclone Alfred in March.  However, they are following the same trajectory that hindered the club in past years whenever they appeared to be nearing their potential. As a consequence, that Hardwick gesture should be considered as more than a mere behavioral lapse. It’s a distress signal that does not bode well for the Queenslanders. While the Suns are eager to remain in contention with the top eight, Melbourne faces its own crisis, which is similarly deep-seated but in a much different way. After recovering from a disappointing start to the season and nearing a return to respectability among its peer clubs, the Demons have experienced a decline in status, driven by the fact that while their form has been reasonable (see their performance against the ladder leader in the Kings Birthday match), their conversion in front of goal is poor enough to rank last in the competition. Furthermore, their opponents find them exceptionally easy to score against. As a result, they have effectively eliminated themselves from the finals race and are again positioned to finish in the bottom half of the ladder.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 287 replies