Jump to content

The Science Behind Cale Morton

Featured Replies

Posted

With the drafting season well and truly upon us and the memories of skinny first-round draft picks being unable to stack on any kilos still fresh in our minds, I thought it might be wise to understand the science behind why some boys stay boys and others become men.

And with any hope our recruiters have watched this video and will stay away from the 'skinny and tall high-half forward, great aerobic capacity and the potential to develop into that Nick Riewoldt type player after a couple preseasons in the gym' draft prospects...

 
 

"So I thought that we should just try some of this experimental myostatin blocker on our guys. Hopefully it is safe, but, hell, time will tell"

"Sure James - should I deliver it to Windy Hill, through the same back door as the other stuff?"

Cale Morton had the same build as The Late Robert Flower.

Just couldn't play footy with the same panache.(Few could)

Your body shape is irrelevant in Aussie rules.

Edited by Biffen


Cale Morton had the same build as The Late Robert Flower.

Just couldn't play footy with the same panache.(Few could)

Your body shape is irrelevant in Aussie rules.

It's not the same anymore. Flower definitely was a once-in-a-generation player but these days you need a good balance between core strength and pace.

Cale had neither.

It's not the same anymore. Flower definitely was a once-in-a-generation player but these days you need a good balance between core strength and pace.

Cale had neither.

Libba?

Brad Hardie?

Dale Weightman?

KB?

Core strength is great but being a very good player is the most important thing.This is where we [censored] it up royally every time because we pay too many experts.

AFL recruiters seem to have lost sight of the fact that the kids need to be able to play. With all the tests of pace, endurance and agility, a great football brain and instincts seem to have taken a secondary place. They are looking for people who fit the athletic profile in the belief that they can be turned into footballers. There is no way a player like Tom Rockliff should have slipped to the PSD, but he was a pure footballer who didn't fit in the athletic profile clubs thought they needed so despite his excellent year he was overlooked. Likewise, Melbourne repeatedly drafted kids with specific athletic attributes without looking at the whole package and wound up with Morton, Bennell, Blease, Nicholson etc. All runners with question marks on their ability to play, but it was assumed that they could be taught to play.

I think it's clearly time to re-think the priorities. If we can get a kid who fits the athletic profile and can play, great. If not, get a kid who can play the game first and foremost.

 

I doubt recruiters are ignoring whether the guys can play or not. Morton looked absolute gun as an underage player.

And his first season with us was very promising. He looked like he was going to make it.


Morton was not developed properly and the year under Neeld completely broke him.

Cale Morton had the same build as The Late Robert Flower.

Just couldn't play footy with the same panache.(Few could)

Your body shape is irrelevant in Aussie rules.

courage & deesire, courage & deesire, courage & deesire. = the NEED to have a crack

I doubt recruiters are ignoring whether the guys can play or not. Morton looked absolute gun as an underage player.

Thrashed Goodes once.

Somehow.

Libba?

Brad Hardie?

Dale Weightman?

KB?

Core strength is great but being a very good player is the most important thing.This is where we [censored] it up royally every time because we pay too many experts.

Players from totally different eras. The way the game is played now, size and strength are extremely important.


I doubt recruiters are ignoring whether the guys can play or not. Morton looked absolute gun as an underage player.

Proves PRs theory,let other clubs develop them and when their ready to shine,offer a great deal and get at their prime.

Did Birchall, Suckling, Stratton, Langford, Hill, Isaac Smith,and Gunston all play in the grand final or am I mistaken?

Hill was tiny when he was drafted and is hardly bulky now. The other 6 were all tall and thin.

What was the difference between Morton's physique when drafted and that of Fyfe? Very little I would have thought. In a lot of ways Morton fits the mould for the taller midfielders that seem so prevalent these days, but he was never able to add the extra muscle that he needed to become a genuine contested ballwinner.

I doubt recruiters are ignoring whether the guys can play or not. Morton looked absolute gun as an underage player.

And his first season with us was very promising. He looked like he was going to make it.

Morton was not developed properly and the year under Neeld completely broke him.

I agree with all three of these posts, particularly the last. Morton was a far better player than most around here give him credit for, and was yet another player whose career was destroyed by Neeld.

What was the difference between Morton's physique when drafted and that of Fyfe? Very little I would have thought. In a lot of ways Morton fits the mould for the taller midfielders that seem so prevalent these days, but he was never able to add the extra muscle that he needed to become a genuine contested ballwinner.

I agree with all three of these posts, particularly the last. Morton was a far better player than most around here give him credit for, and was yet another player whose career was destroyed by Neeld.

I think the game changed a bit on Morton.

It got faster and he went from having a yard of speed over guys to being just average pace. And it got more congested meaning more pressure on kicks. Morton was a very good kick as a junior as he found space and could kick long to advantage.

He was destined to be a wingman. And this current Hawthorn team have brought the position back in to fashion a little. His job was pretty much to just run up and down the field and be an option, plus with his height you could kick it up to him 1 on 1 v other wingmen.

When Morton came in only Hawthorn played full ground zoning. Then St Kilda and Collingwood perfected the press. What should've happened is after a good first season, Dean Bailey should've put Morton back to the 2's and made him develop his contested ball, made him develop his kicking under pressure etc. Instead he coasted along in the team.

Neeld was right to put Morton back to Casey but ambitiously tried to make him a centre square midfielder. It didn't really work. Also tried him at half forward.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

    It seems like only yesterday that these two sides faced off against each other in the centre of the continent. It was when Melbourne was experiencing a rare period of success with five wins from its previous six matches including victories over both of last year’s grand finalists.  Well, it wasn’t yesterday but it was early last month and it remains etched clearly in the memory. The Saints were going through a slump and the predicted outcome of their encounter at TIO Traeger Park was a virtual no-brainer. A Melbourne victory and another step closer to a possible rise into finals contention. Something that was unthinkable after opening the season with five straight defeats.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 5 replies
  • REPORT: Carlton

    I am now certain that the decline in fortunes of the Melbourne Football Club from a premiership power with the potential for more success to come in the future, started when the team ran out for their Round 9 match up against Carlton last year. After knocking over the Cats in a fierce contest the week before, the Demons looked uninterested at the start of play and gave the Blues a six goal start. They recovered to almost snatch victory but lost narrowly with a score of 11.10.76 to 12.5.77. Yesterday, they revisited the scene and provided their fans with a similar display of ineptitude early in the proceedings. Their attitude at the start was poor, given that the game was so winnable. Unsurprisingly, the resulting score was almost identical to that of last year and for the fourth time in succession, the club has lost a game against Carlton despite having more scoring opportunities. 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 3 replies
  • CASEY: Carlton

    The Casey Demons smashed the Carlton Reserves off the park at Casey Fields on Sunday to retain a hold on an end of season wild card place. It was a comprehensive 108 point victory in which the home side was dominant and several of its players stood out but, in spite of the positivity of such a display, we need to place an asterisk over the outcome which saw a net 100 point advantage to the combined scores in the two contests between Demons and Blues over the weekend.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: St. Kilda

    The Demons come face to face with St. Kilda for the second time this season for their return clash at Marvel Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 310 replies
  • PODCAST: Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Tuesday, 22nd July @ 8:00pm. Join Binman & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to Carlton at the MCG.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 40 replies
  • VOTES: Carlton

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Kozzy Pickett & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 23 replies