N.Jones - never found rhythm

Grimes - excellent all game

Salem - a schoolboy footballer

Watts - classy but flawed

Dawes - disappointingly little influence

Viney - excellent tagging game

Frawley - succumbed when pressured

Tyson - few clear possessions

Dunn - surprisingly poor disposal

Kent - probably wasn't playing

Garland - career worst game

Pederson - great first half

Vince - great second half

Nicholson - crap , as expected

Barry - had little impact

Gawn - couldn't assert himself

Howe - most effective defender

Jamar - clearly our best

Bail - couldn't justify selection

M.Jones - was he playing?

Terlich - poor before injury

Jetta - useful both ends

Garland is a big issue. I know he is coming back from injury but his fumbling, poor decision making and touch are costing us.

It isn't a case of we are playing one down, he is contributing to the opposition.

He is a much better player but there has to be a time when he needs to back and find touch.

Nicho - Shouldn't have played

Watts frustratingly lazy disposal

Terlich - outlived his usefulness

Kent - poor for 2weeks

Jetta - loved his effort

Barry - deserves next week

Grimes - best game yet

Viney - shut down Libba

Salem - needs Casey time

Bail - doesn't offer enough

M Jones - same as Bail

Umpires - should be ashamed

Think you are being a little tough on a few.

Frawley - Jones, one disposal

M Jones - Played his role

Nicho - Played within limitations

Gawn - Presented when required

Barry - Showed some glimpses

N.Jones - never found rhythm < but still accumulated 23 possessions and was into everything

Grimes - excellent all game

Salem - a schoolboy footballer

Watts - classy but flawed

Dawes - disappointingly little influence < 2 goals isn't too bad

Viney - excellent tagging game

Frawley - succumbed when pressured < but still 22 possessions

Tyson - few clear possessions < (only 19 possessions)

Dunn - surprisingly poor disposal < but still took 8 marks and had 18 disposals

Kent - probably wasn't playing <played in some good passages

Garland - career worst game < 20 possessions

Pederson - great first half

Vince - great second half

Nicholson - crap , as expected

Barry - had little impact < what do you expect in 5 game time minutes?

Gawn - couldn't assert himself < but still took 5 marks and scored

Howe - most effective defender

Jamar - clearly our best

Bail - couldn't justify selection < 14 possessions and lifted in the second half

M.Jones - was he playing? < 16 possessions and played a good game (watch the replay)

Terlich - poor before injury

Jetta - useful both ends

N.Jones - never found rhythm

Grimes - excellent all game

Salem - a schoolboy footballer

Watts - classy but flawed

Dawes - disappointingly little influence

Viney - excellent tagging game

Frawley - succumbed when pressured

Tyson - few clear possessions

Dunn - surprisingly poor disposal

Kent - probably wasn't playing

Garland - career worst game

Pederson - great first half

Vince - great second half

Nicholson - crap , as expected

Barry - had little impact

Gawn - couldn't assert himself

Howe - most effective defender

Jamar - clearly our best

Bail - couldn't justify selection

M.Jones - was he playing?

Terlich - poor before injury

Jetta - useful both ends

Grimes- Gifted Crameri Goal

Frawley- What the [censored]

Bail- average at best

Barry- subby Too late

N.Jones - never found rhythm < but still accumulated 23 possessions and was into everything

Grimes - excellent all game

Salem - a schoolboy footballer

Watts - classy but flawed

Dawes - disappointingly little influence < 2 goals isn't too bad

Viney - excellent tagging game

Frawley - succumbed when pressured < but still 22 possessions

Tyson - few clear possessions < (only 19 possessions)

Dunn - surprisingly poor disposal < but still took 8 marks and had 18 disposals

Kent - probably wasn't playing <played in some good passages

Garland - career worst game < 20 possessions

Pederson - great first half

Vince - great second half

Nicholson - crap , as expected

Barry - had little impact < what do you expect in 5 game time minutes?

Gawn - couldn't assert himself < but still took 5 marks and scored

Howe - most effective defender

Jamar - clearly our best

Bail - couldn't justify selection < 14 possessions and lifted in the second half

M.Jones - was he playing? < 16 possessions and played a good game (watch the replay)

Terlich - poor before injury

Jetta - useful both ends

Possessions mean absolutely nothing when you continue to butcher it constantly like Garland and Bail did today.

Watts should read: Needs longer stops.

N.Jones - never found rhythm < but still accumulated 23 possessions and was into everything

Grimes - excellent all game

Salem - a schoolboy footballer

Watts - classy but flawed

Dawes - disappointingly little influence < 2 goals isn't too bad

Viney - excellent tagging game

Frawley - succumbed when pressured < but still 22 possessions

Tyson - few clear possessions < (only 19 possessions)Dunn - surprisingly poor disposal < but still took 8 marks and had 18 disposals

Kent - probably wasn't playing <played in some good passages

Garland - career worst game < 20 possessions

Pederson - great first half

Vince - great second half

Nicholson - crap , as expected

Barry - had little impact < what do you expect in 5 game time minutes?

Gawn - couldn't assert himself < but still took 5 marks and scored

Howe - most effective defender

Jamar - clearly our best

Bail - couldn't justify selection < 14 possessions and lifted in the second half

M.Jones - was he playing? < 16 possessions and played a good game (watch the replay)

Terlich - poor before injury

Jetta - useful both ends

SEN commentators gave Frawley the 3 votes? I didn't see the game and only listened to the last half but all agreed Chip was the most influential player.

SEN commentators gave Frawley the 3 votes? I didn't see the game and only listened to the last half but all agreed Chip was the most influential player.

That's because so many on here are letting his contractual situation completely colour their views regarding his play. Having said that he did make some mistakes and I didn't think he should have got the 3 votes.

Jamar:

Palmed to Footscray.

That's because so many on here are letting his contractual situation completely colour their views regarding his play. Having said that he did make some mistakes and I didn't think he should have got the 3 votes.

Agreed. Although there is no way he was top 3 today in any way shape or form. A few of his clangers were so so costly i'm still sore from them, definitely wasn't the only one who wasn't clean with the footy today though.

Dawes - Can't take marks

Jamar:

Palmed to Footscray.

I thought Russian had a pretty handy game but you're right. There were a couple where he beat Minson & then palmed the ball straight to him. Why would you bother ?

Frawley - Smashed spud Jones

M.Jones - was he playing? < 16 possessions and played a good game (watch the replay)

Hahaha.

M. Jones played a good game?

M. Jones? Watch the replay?

Your post is great because of you know, obviously terrible today.

SEN commentators gave Frawley the 3 votes? I didn't see the game and only listened to the last half but all agreed Chip was the most influential player.

That's because so many on here are letting his contractual situation completely colour their views regarding his play. Having said that he did make some mistakes and I didn't think he should have got the 3 votes.

I was at the game and I had Frawley clearly BOG. Liam Jones had 1 possession and was subbed off at 3/4 time. He absolutely dominated them in the defensive 50. As good as he's been presenting as a lead-up forward his real position if Full Back and he showed today that he is still AA quality.

Dawes - Can't take marks

It's a problem

I was at the game and I had Frawley clearly BOG. Liam Jones had 1 possession and was subbed off at 3/4 time. He absolutely dominated them in the defensive 50. As good as he's been presenting as a lead-up forward his real position if Full Back and he showed today that he is still AA quality.

You can't give BOG to a guy who regularly butchers the ball and somehow turns our advantage to a 50/50 with horrible execution.

Liam Jones is cold, cold, cold, hot, cold anyway; so keeping Jones quiet has been simple for most of the year.

For Frawley's sake, I hope he has his suitors conned as well as 70% of us MFC supporters. He is fool's gold.

Edited June 30, 201411 yr by TGR

You can't give BOG to a guy who regularly butchers the ball and somehow turns our advantage to a 50/50 with horrible execution.

Liam Jones is cold, cold, cold, hot, cold anyway; so keeping Jones quiet has been simple for most of the year.

For Frawley's sake, I hope he has his suitors conned as well as 70% of us MFC supporters. He is fool's gold.

Thats the same Jones who was the probably the reason the Dogs got over the line against Collingwood 2 weeks ago ?

And as for turning advantage into 50/50's - as opposed to a lot of what I saw yesterday - where we turned advantage into disadvantage.

He wasn't in my opinion BOG but we have a lot more footballers that I am scratching my head over other than Frawley.

Edited June 30, 201411 yr by nutbean