Agreed

Dunn was a fool to make that post

no Hawk players would have stuck up for Buddy after he ditched them, in fact as soon as he announced he was gone he became the enemy

And all Buddy did was leave via free agency, Clark burned us in the most disgusting way possible

I hope the players despise Clark after what he did to us, although its now obvious Dunn isnt one of them

So if no Hawk players stuck up for buddy then why is he part of Jordan Lewis wedding party?

FFS some people need to think before posting rubbish as usual.

So if no Hawk players stuck up for buddy then why is he part of Jordan Lewis wedding party?

FFS some people need to think before posting rubbish as usual.

The issue wasn't that Dunn stuck up for Mitch. It was that he criticised Dee supporters for their angry response to Mitch leaving. He probably intended to criticise the poor taste comments made but the way it came across was that he was potting his own (Dee's) supporters.

The Lewis/Buddy comparison isn't the same. Frawley and other Dee players are attending Rivers' forthcoming wedding and supporters aren't commenting on that.

The Dunn/Clark thing was completely different.

BTW, Hawks players didn't let their friendship stop them from physically going after Buddy in the GF. I hope ours do the same with Clark (and Frawley).

Edited October 2, 201411 yr by Lucifer's Hero

The club probably advised him to remove it because he should not be conversing with the nuff-nuffs who are frothing at the mouth.

Dunn knows Frawley, probably is good friends with him, that doesn't change because he leaves the Demons.

It's pathetically naïve of you to think that the players should spurn other players that leave a club. Clubs treat players as chattel to achieve an end, players are aware that their careers are at the mercy of those at the clubs.

Many on here want to trade out all but a few players - if the club can spurn a player on a whim, why should the players spurn each other for a similar decision by one of their colleagues?

This is not some emotional investment in the club for them, it is their career. Frawley made the best decision for his career (and it happens to be the best decision for the Demons too), and we should get over what the club got over ages ago.

Doesn't seem like the best decision for the Dees. If he's on 1.8m over 4 years we'll be lucky to get pick [censored] 20.

Doesn't seem like the best decision for the Dees. If he's on 1.8m over 4 years we'll be lucky to get pick [censored] 20.

We will see.

High time Frawley now indicates who he wants to play with so that the finality and planning for us can begin in earnest!

Cmon James, time to come clean and let all know!

High time Frawley now indicates who he wants to play with so that the finality and planning for us can begin in earnest!

Cmon James, time to come clean and let all know!

Nothing can happen until the Free Agency period begins on Friday.

High time Frawley now indicates who he wants to play with so that the finality and planning for us can begin in earnest!

Cmon James, time to come clean and let all know!

What on earth difference does it make. Until the FA period opens AND the paperwork goes to the AFL AND they advise the compensation nothing can happen.

There's a hole in the demonland banner.

There's a hole in the demonland banner.

Cross, Dunn, Jetta or even Hogan perhaps?

Edited October 2, 201411 yr by ignition.

High time Frawley now indicates who he wants to play with so that the finality and planning for us can begin in earnest!

Cmon James, time to come clean and let all know!

You clown.

In spite of all your rubbish, he did not make up his mind long ago, as you claimed.

He's still negotiating and playing the clubs off against one another.

I can tell you I 100% believe he's now headed for Hawthorn, whether he has decided it or not.

Where's your "ships in the night" rubbish now, ya peanut?!

You clown.

In spite of all your rubbish, he did not make up his mind long ago, as you claimed.

He's still negotiating and playing the clubs off against one another.

I can tell you I 100% believe he's now headed for Hawthorn, whether he has decided it or not.

Where's your "ships in the night" rubbish now, ya peanut?!

All this because we front loaded his contract....

The club probably advised him to remove it because he should not be conversing with the nuff-nuffs who are frothing at the mouth.

Dunn knows Frawley, probably is good friends with him, that doesn't change because he leaves the Demons.

It's pathetically naïve of you to think that the players should spurn other players that leave a club. Clubs treat players as chattel to achieve an end, players are aware that their careers are at the mercy of those at the clubs.

Many on here want to trade out all but a few players - if the club can spurn a player on a whim, why should the players spurn each other for a similar decision by one of their colleagues?

This is not some emotional investment in the club for them, it is their career. Frawley made the best decision for his career (and it happens to be the best decision for the Demons too), and we should get over what the club got over ages ago.

Dunn went in to bat for CLARK not FRAWLEY

nice work

All this because we front loaded his contract....

No all of this because we were [censored].

The backline want out. Rivers, Chip, and watch Garlo take off when he gets his chance.

We all thought the shitness these guys had to endure would make them a stronger, more cohesive unit when the worm turns, but this is our team and we should have realised we have a bunch of downhill skiing sooks. So I expect Colin to have a good year, and then decide whether he wants to reunite with his old mate Rivs at the cats, or Chippa at the Hawks.

On the topic of front ended contracts should we start offering back ended ones if a players coming up for FA?

All this because we front loaded his contract....

Even if he was a RFA, given his form and efforts I don't believe we would have matched any offer anyways.

Even if he was a RFA, given his form and efforts I don't believe we would have matched any offer anyways.

Exactly

Restricted free agency is a farce

What club would want to keep a player that doesn't want to be there?

Edited October 2, 201411 yr by hogans_heroes

According to Jay Clark Chip has chosen the Hawks. Not surprising or unexpected.

Has chosen Hawthorn.

Has chosen Hawthorn.

jared and mitch will be sad

jared and mitch will be sad

And poor Chris Scott...

At least James has smart people advising him. I doubt the Hawks are paying as much as the Cats which could be a problem for us.

Edited October 2, 201411 yr by Robbie57

According to Jay Clark Chip has chosen the Hawks. Not surprising or unexpected.

This could be very very bad for us............

He can let the Hawks juggernaut piggyback him to success. Lazy so-and-so.

Hnmm very interesting if true. Given his Girlfriend has strong Geelong ties, I find this astounding given my inside info! Obviously the x Hawthorn factor had more pull than either his girlfriend or the Freo ship ahoy!

Interesting!

This could be very very bad for us............

I would have thought so if he was headed to Geelong where they are known for paying unders due to culture?

Hnmm very interesting if true. Given his Girlfriend has strong Geelong ties, I find this astounding given my inside info! Obviously the x Hawthorn factor had more pull than either his girlfriend or the Freo ship ahoy!

Interesting!

Ties to Geelong, or the Geelong Football Club?

I think, opposite to B59, Hawthorn has always been the club, and Geelong joined the party too late. In Geelong's smugness, they probably thought they just had to show up and would nab him.

Eat shlt kitties.