Jump to content

Pledge per Win

Featured Replies

Back in the 70's and early 80's we used to have Gambling nights to raise money - who remembers Crown and Anchor? These nights also included some "special entertainments". Never did win the chook raffle.

 

i agree this funny credit in good morning let me know 10 years completed when team things losing or winning start complaining the way other day so anybody can pledge in the afternoon sad and happy

Your finest work, bal.

 

Back in the 70's and early 80's we used to have Gambling nights to raise money - who remembers Crown and Anchor? These nights also included some "special entertainments". Never did win the chook raffle.

Back in 1974 I went with a friend to an Oak Park FC gambling night Bbo.

Now we have to remember this was before Casinos and Pokies in Vic.

He close the Crown and Anchor.

Wiped them out.

Shortly after this feat we decided that discretion might be the better part of valour and left.

Never forget it.


Back in 1974 I went with a friend to an Oak Park FC gambling night Bbo.

Now we have to remember this was before Casinos and Pokies in Vic.

He close the Crown and Anchor.

Wiped them out.

Shortly after this feat we decided that discretion might be the better part of valour and left.

Never forget it.

Yes I remember doing similar to my cricket club just by betting $50 a time on crowns or anchors and cleaning up one night. Then I realised, with some advice from others, that this was a bit counter productive for the club. So coughed most of it back to keep the peace.

You do understand the scheme don't you ? Give away hard earned is predicated on there being change and that change is winning !

If we win 5 games for the year....The club wouldn't make much money from the scheme (5x30$) and the supporters will still be disappointed with the teams efforts, it's so hard to predict how many games we will win in 2014. For example, just say I have roughly 300$ to give to the club and I expect and pledge 10wins x 30$, if we win 15 games I'm giving 150$ which I can't afford, or if we win 2 games = 60$ then the club is missing out on money potentially. I know we can donate the money in other ways. It's a win win if the club plays well, but if we have another bad year....this fundraiser could be useless. There must be a better way to get people to give money to the club, especially considering our lack of wins in recent years, winning should be regular and something we expect and become used to, that's why people sign up for memberships. We have been starved of wins for years.

What about for donations (minimum say 100$) go in the draw for a signed Jack Trengove guernsey and a pair of his playing boots...?

Perhaps I represent the point of view of a person who has a tighter budget than others, on a Saturday night when we win I don't want to be thinking about my bank balance. I don't like the idea of it.

 

Perhaps I represent the point of view of a person who has a tighter budget than others, on a Saturday night when we win I don't want to be thinking about my bank balance. I don't like the idea of it.

Don't be apart of it.


If we win 5 games for the year....The club wouldn't make much money from the scheme (5x30$) and the supporters will still be disappointed with the teams efforts, it's so hard to predict how many games we will win in 2014. For example, just say I have roughly 300$ to give to the club and I expect and pledge 10wins x 30$, if we win 15 games I'm giving 150$ which I can't afford, or if we win 2 games = 60$ then the club is missing out on money potentially. I know we can donate the money in other ways. It's a win win if the club plays well, but if we have another bad year....this fundraiser could be useless. There must be a better way to get people to give money to the club, especially considering our lack of wins in recent years, winning should be regular and something we expect and become used to, that's why people sign up for memberships. We have been starved of wins for years.

What about for donations (minimum say 100$) go in the draw for a signed Jack Trengove guernsey and a pair of his playing boots...?

I've estimated how many wins we will get this year and I've pledged accordingly, if we win twice as many it will cost me a lot more but I doubt that will happen.

If it does I'll bear the consequences, but I'll be so happy I won't give a toss, we will be in the top 4 and playing finals.

Work out how much you can afford and halve it, if you want to sign up, that way if we win double the number of games you'll only be up for what you were originally going to contribute.

Who wanted Paul Roos as coach?

Who wanted a board overhaul?

Who wanted new coaching staff?

Well I guess pledge per win is one way to gain some cash, it's more interesting than tin rattling.

I like the idea, whilst I have limited funds and often try to support the club as much as possible, instead of the raffle tickets weekly I prefer this, and it takes a weight off the foundation heros, although I'm sure this year they will be spoken too haha!

I like the idea. I am one of those who on a yearly basis buy a media polo, jacket/jumper a new jumper when there are new sponsors and now my wardrobe is overflowing with years of awesome red and blue gear. This i see as another way to support. I am willing to part with some hard earned per win.

IN NO WAY will i ever wish the MFC to lose. If you cant afford to pledge then simply don’t. When we win i don’t see me paying $10/$20 for it a big issue. I am on a tight budget as most of us are but remember we only play once a week. Most of us get paid for doing some sort of work. I am sure some, as i have done, can put aside a small amount to go to the club to celebrate a good weekend when the red and blue bring home the goodies. I doubt anyone is willing to pledge more then they could afford per week. I hope we go through the season undefeated and i can look back and go that it was a awesome year.

I don’t understand how there is so much backlash over a scheme that was designed to help our club raise extra funds that they didn’t have before. I know that we as supporters have put our hands in our pockets over and over again and we haven’t seen the results on the field. Its simple, if you want to partake in the pledge per win scheme then do.. if you don’t then don’t. Its not a competition as to how much money you give etc it is just another way you can support the club if you can afford to.

I know that i wall have this criticized by those who have time to crawl through my post but honestly i don’t care. i have always supported the MFC and i always will. I put my money into the club through membership and buying supporter gear and i attend as many games as i can. I have seen the good years and i have seen the bad years. I know what it feels like to loose a GF and i know what it feels like to finish dead last. What i want is to know what it feels like to win a GF and if my small pledge this year can somehow help the boys get me there then i know it was worth it.

I don’t understand how there is so much backlash over a scheme that was designed to help our club raise extra funds that they didn’t have before.

The 'backlash' has been about 5 posters bemoaning the fact that we are fundraising from Members in yet another way.

That is the sum of it.

If they can't afford it, they won't be apart of it.

Personally, I would love to see a full court press on getting new members but I don't hate this pledge idea. I certainly like it better than the $200 raffle ticket that I have bought in the past few years and outright donations.


I'm all for it, would happily chip in $30 per win or something like that, couldn't offer any more as i am not really rolling in money but i think it's a great idea.

Personally, I would love to see a full court press on getting new members but I don't hate this pledge idea. I certainly like it better than the $200 raffle ticket that I have bought in the past few years and outright donations.

Boosting memberships is the big picture at the moment. I remind Demonlanders that the club runs a membership telemarketing campaign staffed by volunteers.

Boosting memberships is the big picture at the moment. I remind Demonlanders that the club runs a membership telemarketing campaign staffed by volunteers.

The club has to explore every avenue they can to raise money, they don't have the luxury of, say Collingwood, who have a list of sponsors waiting for a chance to give them money, or West Coast who have a waiting list of supporters wanting to become members.

Edited by RobbieF

It's just a fundraiser idea for those who can afford it and I think it's a good idea even though I can't afford to partake this year.

I've estimated how many wins we will get this year and I've pledged accordingly, if we win twice as many it will cost me a lot more but I doubt that will happen.

If it does I'll bear the consequences, but I'll be so happy I won't give a toss, we will be in the top 4 and playing finals.

Work out how much you can afford and halve it, if you want to sign up, that way if we win double the number of games you'll only be up for what you were originally going to contribute.

Robbie I have taken your advice and signed up. Your formula makes sense but if we win 26 games I ill be happy as Larry but I could be looking for new lodgings when the Misses finds out!

  • 1 month later...

WHAT A JOKE!

Worst idea to raise money for the club.

  • Author

i agree this funny credit in good morning let me know 10 years completed when team things losing or winning start complaining the way other day so anybody can pledge in the afternoon sad and happy

he's Angry

WHAT A JOKE!

Worst idea to raise money for the club.

I liked the idea at first.

Now though, whenever I see it promoted I just cringe.

Most recently at 3/4 time last week when the promo popped up on the MCG big screen's..... *facepalm*

 

WHAT A JOKE!

Worst idea to raise money for the club.

Really? It can't hurt.

We won't LOSE money by doing it.

All we can do is gain.

Really? It can't hurt.

We won't LOSE money by doing it.

All we can do is gain.

you're a great martyr machsy


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    When looking back at the disastrous end to the game, I find it a waste of time to concentrate on the final few moments when utter confusion reigned. Forget the 6-6-6 mess, the failure to mark the most dangerous man on the field, the inability to seal the game when opportunities presented themselves to Clayton Oliver, Harry Petty and Charlie Spargo, the vision of match winning players of recent weeks in Kozzy Pickett and Jake Melksham spending helpless minutes on the interchange bench and the powerlessness of seizing the opportunity to slow the tempo of the game down in those final moments.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sandringham

    The Casey Demons rebounded from a sluggish start to manufacture a decisive win against Sandringham in the final showdown, culminating a quarter century of intense rivalry between the fluctuating alignments of teams affiliated with AFL clubs Melbourne and St Kilda, as the Saints and the Zebras prepare to forge independent paths in 2026. After conceding three of the first four goals of the match, the Demons went on a goal kicking rampage instigated by the winning ruck combination of Tom Campbell with 26 hitouts, 26 disposals and 13 clearances and his apprentice Will Verrall who contributed 20 hitouts. This gave first use of the ball to the likes of Jack Billings, Bayley Laurie, Riley Bonner and Koltyn Tholstrup who was impressive early. By the first break they had added seven goals and took a strong grip on the game. The Demons were well served up forward early by Mitch Hardie and, as the game progressed, Harry Sharp proved a menace with a five goal performance. Emerging young forwards Matthew Jefferson and Luker Kentfield kicked two each but the former let himself down with some poor kicking for goal.
    Young draft talent Will Duursma showed the depth of his talent and looks well out of reach for Melbourne this year. Kalani White was used sparingly and had a brief but uneventful stint in the ruck.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: West Coast

    The Demons return to the scene of the crime on Saturday to face the wooden spooners the Eagles at the Docklands. Who comes in and who goes out? Like moving deck chairs on the Titanic.

      • Haha
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 76 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    This season cannot end soon enough. Disgraceful.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 469 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Captain Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year Award from Christian Petracca, Kozzy Pickett, Jake Bowey & Clayton Oliver. Your votes please; 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Sad
      • Clap
      • Like
    • 25 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and there are only 5 games to go. Can the Demons find some consistency and form as they stagger towards the finish line of another uninspiring season?

      • Haha
    • 566 replies