Must get a minimum 4 weeks for daring to execute a fair bump.

won't be looked at.

Must get a minimum 4 weeks for daring to execute a fair bump.

You talking about the umpire there pal? Killer bump, but shocking decision.

In the words of the immortal Stephen Quartermaine, "That was a shocking decision. That umpire should never officiate another game."

The umpires shouldn't have the authority to make the reports anymore everything gets looked at now they don't need to they just end up looking foolish

Joke of a report, he bumped the Carlscum players shoulder FFS. Will be instantly thrown out

Must get a minimum 4 weeks for daring to execute a fair bump.

You should've added a winking icon

Fair bump. Even the Carlton fans around me were laughing at it. Reported for daring to bruise a Blue.

After this round I appreciate how puerile the umpires are these days.

Wow! Almost as bad as the Waite / Chip free........

That was an abysmal decision.

And a real shame to discourage that sort of play, because we are absolutely crying out for it!!

Also, it really killed Tapscott's attack on the ball. He was best on ground for us until that point and faded badly. A real shame, he was smashing it (pardon the pun).

With our luck he will get weeks, because he MAY have contacted the players head.

and the holding the ball rule seems to be almost extinguished unless you get trapped under 15 players sitting on you

how doe the afl get away with changing the interpretation of the rules just for the sake of moving the ball at all costs and reducing ball ups

Nothing in it.

The issue will be thrown out at the MRP.

I am more interested in the Waite liverpool kiss on TMac.

Waite has a bad record and he did move to headbutt him. Should IMO.

and the holding the ball rule seems to be almost extinguished unless you get trapped under 15 players sitting on you

how doe the afl get away with changing the interpretation of the rules just for the sake of moving the ball at all costs and reducing ball ups

You're sounding very bitter and negative DC ( a burwood thing ?). Perhaps you should join myself, OD and Bangkok Demon in Thailand. Also I think wyl visits about that time.

Nothing in it.

The issue will be thrown out at the MRP.

I am more interested in the Waite liverpool kiss on TMac.

Waite has a bad record and he did move to headbutt him. Should IMO.

When was that? I didn't see it at the ground. I will look for it on the tape.

You're sounding very bitter and negative DC ( a burwood thing ?). Perhaps you should join myself, OD and Bangkok Demon in Thailand. Also I think wyl visits about that time.

and i think thaipantsman might be there too. he may be able to set you up with some nice local tranys?

Jack Grimes shoulder breaking tackle should get 6 weeks - if they are consistent.

An unlucky accident but they should've taken more care not to injure him.

When was that? I didn't see it at the ground. I will look for it on the tape.

First few minutes. When Strauss won after on the boundary I think

Great bump from Tapscott and he put Simpson on his back again in the next contest. Love him!

Anyone know what Walker did to him to give away that free and goal early on?

Nothing in it.

The issue will be thrown out at the MRP.

I am more interested in the Waite liverpool kiss on TMac.

Waite has a bad record and he did move to headbutt him. Should IMO.

I agree - should definitely be looked at.

Great bump from Tapscott and he put Simpson on his back again in the next contest. Love him!

Anyone know what Walker did to him to give away that free and goal early on?

Just gave him a little whack on the chin. A bit of a jumper punch; nothing more.

The umpire should be embarrassed - just wanting to assert authority when he clearly couldn't have seen head high contact. Report will be thrown out .... no case to answer.

Just gave him a little whack on the chin. A bit of a jumper punch; nothing more.

Ah okay, I was loving Tappy's little pat of encouragement on Walkers chest after he kicked the goal.

The umpire should be embarrassed - just wanting to assert authority when he clearly couldn't have seen head high contact. Report will be thrown out .... no case to answer.

Perhaps the umpire (or his employers) might consider an apology. Nah - would never happen.