Jump to content

2010 Player Review - # 34 Stefan Martin

Featured Replies

Posted

Hampered by a hip complaint for much of the second half of the season, but struggled to impress when he was fit. Needs a permanent position on which to focus. Must improve in 2011 to prolong his AFL career - Luke Holmesby melbournefc

Games MFC 2010 2 Total 29 Goals MFC 2010 0 Total 6

Games CSFC 2010 4 Goals CSFC 2010 7

Games CSFC (res) 2010 2 Goals CSFC (res) 2010 3

 

Luke has summed it up well. Needs to step up in 2011 and provide an option. Very limited options for him. Forward/relief ruck is one.

Luke has summed it up well. Needs to step up in 2011 and provide an option. Very limited options for him. Forward/relief ruck is one.

The way things seem currently (prior to the drafts) Stef must have an impact forward or relief ruck as you suggest HT. I thought when we first saw him, he had some potential down back and his ventures forward, he looked lost.

Priority # 1 for Stef is get some aggression into your play and attack that ball.

Could do anything, could continue to do absolutely nothing. I like him and hopefully things turn.

 

Disappointing that he was injured or played injured for a great part of the season. Hope he's better next year.

He was really impressive when he first played. Big strong body- looked capable of anything. I couldn't believe how far backwards he went this year -lumbering and lost. I certainly hope he finds his way again as he could be the strong forward we need.


I dont think he'l ever make it as a forward. And to be fair he didn't really get much of chance at making a position he's as he was thrown around quiet a lot (when he wasnt injured).

I think he could be an ok defender, unfortunately not so confident about his disposal and decision making.

I dont think he'l ever make it as a forward. And to be fair he didn't really get much of chance at making a position he's as he was thrown around quiet a lot (when he wasnt injured).

I think he could be an ok defender, unfortunately not so confident about his disposal and decision making.

Agreed - he was chopped around a bit but if not up forward i don't see aplace for him. he won't fit in our best backline unless he gains a fair bit of pace

Quite a few seem to have written him off already.

I'm more than happy to persevere with him.

 

Quite a few seem to have written him off already.

I'm more than happy to persevere with him.

Me too, but I'd also like to see him given an opportunity to settle into a position. He plays more like a defender, but there's not much room for tall defenders at Melbourne at the present time.


I dont think he'l ever make it as a forward. And to be fair he didn't really get much of chance at making a position he's as he was thrown around quiet a lot (when he wasnt injured).

I think he could be an ok defender, unfortunately not so confident about his disposal and decision making.

I think he's worth preserving with, think he has more potential than Warnock who is 2 one dimensional.

Agreed - he was chopped around a bit but if not up forward i don't see aplace for him. he won't fit in our best backline unless he gains a fair bit of pace

He has good pace, probably his strenght.

Im not giving up on the kid at all.

I actually new a bit about him before he was drafted.

He barely played any footy mainly basketball, he played one good game at haileybury which drove the dees to take a punt on him. I definitely think he's worth persisting with i just dont really have any expectations.

Yep, good call.

Exactly what I want.

He should not be playing in the backline.


I went out to Visy in the preseason and thought Martin showed promise versus Essendon. He presented well and got his hands to the footy, but just kept dropping easy marks. Either he can take those marks, in which case he has some potential to be a player up front (along with a ruck relief role, I imagine), or you think he can't take a mark to save himself and therefore he'll never be any good anywhere.

Has some positive attributes but needs to find some confidence when he has the footy.

It's pretty clear what Stefan needs to do over the pre-season: work on becoming a ruck/forward.

He has little future as a backman. He's behind Frawley, Rivers, Garland and Warnock, and if we keep McNamara he'd have another contender.

I thought he was quite good against Brisbane in the ruck when he got his chance early this year. But he is just terrible as a forward.

If he can work at it, though, he could find himself in the 22 come Round 1.

Hmmm i think i agree with everybody else on this one. He needs to tell Bailey that he wants to play in the Ruck/Forward position that we need. If he can kick 1-2 goals a game and reieve Jamar, then he is halfway there. The kid can take a mark, needs to work on his goalkicking though.

"He needs to tell Bailey..."?!??

Are you serious?

Loved his low gather on the run under pressure ~45 out hff reflex banana inside opponent to robbo at the top of the goal square in 09.

  • 3 weeks later...

Not much to say here but this guy is the forgotten bigman of the club. 2 years ago talk around here was we'd unearthed a gem. Personally I rate him ahead of Newted and hope he can have a great preseason and come into 2011 strong, fit and keen to perform. He could well prove to be the back up that Jamar needs. Just a thought before we run off and recruit another project big man which personally I don't think the club will do. I'd say we're more likely to try and recruit a mature age ruckmen again next preseaon.

where do u think his best position is? back?, cause i personally think his rubbish in the forward half.

Stef played 1 or 2 decent games as a back flanker, Where are you pulling this second ruck stuff from ??? Roost it the guy is a basketballer and BTW Newton believe it or not has shown WAY MORE !! Desperate to start to a thread much ??

 

He's a fair way back in the tall defender race, so forward/second ruck is probably his best opportunity to carve a career at Melbourne. Things can change, though.

Not much to say here but this guy is the forgotten bigman of the club. 2 years ago talk around here was we'd unearthed a gem. Personally I rate him ahead of Newted and hope he can have a great preseason and come into 2011 strong, fit and keen to perform. He could well prove to be the back up that Jamar needs. Just a thought before we run off and recruit another project big man which personally I don't think the club will do. I'd say we're more likely to try and recruit a mature age ruckmen again next preseaon.

I would agree- however may consider playing him as a back pocket- doing ruckwork in defence.I still believe we will get another experienced back up to Jamar as security.


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 127 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies